This past week, the Internet exploded in justifiable rage at a Salon article titled “I’m a Pedophile, But Not a Monster” by Todd Nickerson. In the article, Nickerson claims to identify as a pedophile—though he also claims that he has never had sex with children—and argues that he deserves understanding for his sexual predilections.
Most everyone recognized Salon’s article for what it was: a leftist attempt to normalize child molestation in the same way they normalized open homosexuality, transsexuality and other sexual perversions.
Everyone, it seems, except National Review.
Long considered the standard bearer of cuckservatism, National Review has decided to stand athwart humanity yelling “FUCK YOU, DAD!” In a spectacularly tone-deaf article, token Limey Charles C.W. Cooke defended both Nickerson for writing the piece and Salon for publishing it. Even more ridiculously, Cooke invokes Christianity in his pedophile apologia. I must have missed that Beatitude in catechism class: “Blessed are the kiddie diddlers, for they shalt inherit the daycare centers.”
Given how absurd and suicidal it is for a “right-wing” publication to defend child molestation, Cooke’s piece serves as a stark reminder of how toxic National Review is to American conservatism. National Review and its founder, the mercifully deceased William Buckley, built their reputations on purging “undesirable” elements from the conservative movement to wide accolades from the left, transforming a political movement focused on preserving American culture into a clearinghouse for Zionists and corporate whores.
To this end, here are five people that National Review thinks are worse than pedophile Todd Nickerson…
1. John Derbyshire, conservative writer
John Derbyshire is a conservative columnist who wrote for National Review up until three years ago, when outrage exploded over an article he published at Taki’s Magazine (full disclosure: I have written for Takimag in the past and met Derbyshire at this year’s American Renaissance conference, but we have no connections beyond that) titled “The Talk: Nonblack Version.” In his column, Derbyshire made a number of rational arguments on how whites can cope with the very real threat of black-on-white crime in the U.S.
Derbyshire was subsequently targeted by social justice warriors, with Gawker dubbing his piece the “most racist article possible” and a bevy of left-wing publications calling for his termination from National Review. Editor Rich Lowry gave in to the lynch mob, announcing Derb’s firing via a blog post that was so spectacularly cowardly that Lowry refused to refer to Takimag by name, instead calling it a “webzine.” Derb’s termination from National Review also threatened to leave him destitute, as he was undergoing chemotherapy at the time.
2. Donald Trump, businessman and politician
Along with the rest of the cuckservative movement, National Review has joined the mob of nancyboys mewling for Donald Trump’s head. Most recently, Cuckmaster General Rich Lowry—the same guy who fired one of his own writers because of a left-wing lynch mob—had the audacity to go on Fox News and claim that Carly Fiorina had “cut off” Trump’s balls “with the precision of a surgeon” during the last GOP presidential debate. Lowry is so prissy that he can’t even spell out “balls” in a Tweet:
.@realDonaldTrump a deal for you, Donald: if you apologize to Carly for your boorish insult, I might stop noting how she cut your b**** off
— Rich Lowry (@RichLowry) September 24, 2015
Lowry’s flailing attempts at manliness are part of a concerted effort by cuckservatives to bring down Trump by claiming that Fiorina won the last presidential debate. Not only does it show how sad the anti-Trump conservatives have become—that their new standard bearer is a woman who lost the only other political race she competed in by a 10-point margin—it doesn’t even come close to reality.
Every poll released after the debate shows Trump maintaining a comfortable lead over the other candidates; while Fiorina did receive a bump, it came primarily at the expense of Ben Carson and other minor contenders.
3. Mark Steyn, writer and free speech activist
Mark Steyn is a Canadian author known for standing up for free speech in the face of leftist totalitarianism: he successfully defended himself from Canada’s nightmarish “human rights” tribunals when they tried to prosecute him for “Islamophobia,” and he was also the victim of a frivolous “defamation” lawsuit filed by global warming alarmist Michael Mann. Neither of these saved Steyn’s head from National Review’s chopping block when he made the mistake of siding with Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson two years ago, who was being targeted by radical leftists for his supposedly “anti-gay” remarks.
In a spectacularly screechy post, National Review managing editor Jason Lee Steorts furiously clutched his pearls in response to Steyn’s “derogatory language,” urging conservatives to show more “civility” in their arguments. Steyn was subsequently shoved out the door at National Review, leaving Steorts and his colleagues to keep writing scintillating pieces on why conservatives need to endorse gay marriage.
4. Ann Coulter, conservative author and spokesperson
Ann Coulter has managed to stay popular and relevant in our shifting media landscape by being unafraid to challenge societal taboos, including the taboos of the conservative movement. Most recently, Coulter drew fire after she criticized the excessive deference to Israel that Republican presidential candidates showed in the recent debate; half of the candidates responded to the question “What will America look like after you become president?” by mentioning Israel, a foreign country:
Good grief! Huckabee is running for PM of Israel.
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
Cruz, Huckabee Rubio all mentioned ISRAEL in their response to: “What will AMERICA look like after you are president.”
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
Christie also talks @ Israel in response to the question: What will AMERICA look like after you are president?
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
In their indefatigable fashion, National Review immediately began sharpening the knives in response to Coulter’s comments. David French shrieked that Coulter was “pander[ing]” to “white nationalists,” then after facing a backlash for his sanctimony, followed up with an article stating that calling people “cuckservative” is bad, mmmkay?
5. Donald Sterling, businessman and former NBA team owner
Donald Sterling is an entrepreneur and the former owner of the L.A. Clippers basketball team. Last year, Sterling was banned from the NBA for life, fined $2.5 million, and forced to sell the Clippers after a recording of a private conversation in which he made purportedly “racist” remarks was leaked to the media by his mistress, V. Stiviano.
https://twitter.com/ThaRightStuff/status/646454969512517632
Unsurprisingly, National Review lit their torches and joined in the stampede to crucify Sterling. In a cringeworthy “me-too” piece, Deroy Murdock declared that Sterling’s comments represented “real racism” and claimed that left-wing accusations of bigotry should meet the “Sterling Standard.” How’s that working out for you, bub?
Even the most cursory glance at National Review and William Buckley’s career shows that both have been a cancer on American conservatism for decades. No better evidence of this can be found in the fact that it is the left—the people who conservatives are supposed to fight—who praise National Review for its “civility” and “sanity.” The magazine’s most enduring achievement has been shaping conservatism into controlled opposition, rolling over to the left on every issue save for Israel and corporate tax cuts.
The continuing ascent of Donald Trump in the presidential race and the ongoing meltdown of movement conservatives and GOP cucksultants shows that National Review and other, similar outlets have lost their gatekeeping power. With the rise of the alternative right and neomasculinity, countless men and women are finding an outlet for their discontent with both Western society and the impotence of its so-called defenders.
National Review’s defense of pedophilia is just another data point showing their increasing irrelevance.
Read Next: Why Do Hollywood SJWs Still Defend This Admitted Pedophile?
Too many of these ‘publications’ are rolling over for one very simple reason – more readers (equals money). I’ve watched many who once supported conservative America (including the National Review) turn into “leftism light” because they see that the gravy train is leaving them behind.
It’s no wonder why so many feel as they though they are no longer represented. The once firm pillars that used to stand for causes have caved, again, for the bottom line (money) leaving people out and on their own.
But who is reading them nowadays? Magazine subscriptions are tanking, just like newspaper subscriptions. Major tanking. What do they hope to gain by alienating a huge base of people who find pedophilia repulsive? They lose a million readers but gain ten pedos on their roles? I don’t get it?
It’s all raw animal instinct. They don’t actually get it either.
actually this makes some sense. Those guys sitting in the library with a members only jacket and eye glasses that look like a prop from a tv show about serial killers might be the largest demo for magazine subscriptions…..Pandering to Pedophiles from magazines might be an unfortunate, though brilliant ploy.
I hear you. You’re thinking too logically (and you’re right…it doesn’t make any damn sense at all). I’m guessing they are betting the farm (because sales are tanking) and they have nothing left to lose…who the hell knows. In the end, you’re right…they will lose out.
The majority of MSM news watchers are over the age of 65.
The rise of twitter, you tube and facebook means that people are no longer having to get their information and news from the traditional media. They can go direct and watch full 30 minute interviews instead of carefully selected 12 second sound bites.
This is why in Europe and the US the established mainstream politicians are suddenly under pressure. The silent majority can now bypass the propagander machines that are the mainstream press and media.
Exactly. We’ve kind of hit a watershed moment here recently, where we now have alternative and reliable means to get information without having to go through the MSM’s filter. It’s also allowed us to network with each other across the US and across the globe. It’s also allowed us to more easily fact-check, and counter any misinformation that gets put out there.
It also lets us take the MSM and pundits to task directly by questioning their bullshit via social media. Trump has been very effective in this regard in playing the media game, as seen with his retaliation against Fox News and any other bird brain that makes the mistake of attacking him for no good reason.
And of course, the next time Trump goes to a debate, he won’t just to tell the audience “Ask Israel how their wall works.” He can say, “Look at Hungary, they’re building a wall RIGHT NOW and it WORKS.” The media can’t keep a lid on any of this any longer. They are now officially relegated to the dustbin of history.
Yeah right, because sooo many people use facebook and twitter for political purposes. Don´t fool yourself.
What´s the difference between traditional media brainwashing and social media brainwashing? It´s the same shit from other people.
Open your eyes, activate your brain and you neither need traditional media nor social media for the truth. Holy crap!
Amazing isn’t it?
The people who are supposed to be fighting for our liberties are instead defending the perverts and throwing their own under the bus.
You know who your enemies are not by what they say but by how they deal with their supposed allies.
Understanding that pedophilia is not a choice is my argument against gay marriage. Which is not actually true. Environmental factors cause this disgusting faggotry. Kill pedophiles.
You’re absolutely correct. It might be possible however that faggots are born with mental defects which make them susceptible to the degenerate environmental factors.
(Q) Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?
(A) None.
exactly.
further, are we just not recognizing that many pedos are homosexual?
Salon: Accept pedophilia
Salon: Accept homosexuality
Logical commenter: Many pedos are homos
Salon: You homophobic…
Oops, this is false. 98 percent of child molesters are heterosexual males, including those that molest boys.
That is a favorite lie from homosexuals. Thanks for outing youself.
What next? 100% of gay buttsex addicts are heterosexuals? They just do gay stuff but they’re straight, yeah? Gay guys are innocent of being gay? How in the hell can you classify a guy who sexually molests a boy as straight?
100% of faggot cocksuckers who suck cock are CIS-gendered heteronormatives.
Cut to the chase with your insane stats;
100% of bad people are straight white males.
Prove it, “Brian.”
Allright.. Color me stupid, but how does a man who has sexual interest in not-yet-grown men be a heterosexual?
Yes, you’re stupid.
1 molestation is like rape. It has nothing to do with sexual attraxtions. It’s about controlling a victim. Molesters aren’t looking for sexual orgasm. They want to inflict pain and control an innocent victim
2 prepubescent boys have feminine characterstics, not masculine: they have no facial hair, no body hair, no muscular development and high pitched voices. Why would a gay man be attracted to something feminine?
Who says I’m trying to be Brian? That’s not my name, retard. Do you think the hundreds of conservatives who use images of Obama are trying to be Obama?
You people are stupid. I admire Brian. He’s a friend of mine. I am hoping he will be the first gay president with a husband in the White House.
Here’s how, retard:
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pdf
Perpetrators of Sexual Assault
The majority of perpetrators of sexual violence are
men. Studies of sexual assault against children and
young adolescents report that more than 97% of perpetrators were male. Despite popular belief, most
male perpetrators identify themselves as heterosexual and often have consensual sexual relationships with women. One study notes that 98% of male perpetrators self-identify as heterosexual
Look it up yourself.
The state of Michigan are all homosexual? Really?
Here’s their report, read it for yourself:
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pdf
Perpetrators of Sexual Assault
The majority of perpetrators of sexual violence are
men. Studies of sexual assault against children and young adolescents report that more than 97% of perpetrators were male. Despite popular belief, most
male perpetrators identify themselves as heterosexual and often have consensual sexual relationships with women. One study notes that 98% of male perpetrators self-identify as heterosexual
You seem obsessed by the fact that I admire my friend Brian. Why?
Do you see me being obsessed with your conservative friends who pretend to be Obama?
You seem obsessed with Brian. Why do you lie?
Answer the question.
**********************
“Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
You did pretend to be him about a year ago.
LIAR!
LIAR
Nope
I have no intention of sitting here all day playing silly conservative moron games and posting comic strip images. I have educated the public on this site about the true dangers that heterosexual males are to children. I would hope that parents would stay alert and not let their young boys and girls be around heterosexual males unsupervised. The Boy Scouts is a known haven for pedophiles, and you are one of them.
Stop deflecting from those facts.
I’m going to the gym to get more buff for my husband.
You also falsely claimed I did not have four books published. I proved otherwise.
You’re a liar, a pedophile and a stupid moron who posts silly comic strip images in an attempt to get attention.
It won’t work on me. I’m an educated college professor and a liberal. I’m too smart for your silly games.
You conservatives are pathetic people. Truly…. You stick in groups because you fear being in the general public. You will soon be the minority and you know it. You cling to your guns, your bibles and your outdated social views. You will die soon, and it’s all good.
Buh bye!
A child’s risk of being molested by his or her relative’s heterosexual partner is 100 times greater than by someone who might be identified as a homosexual.”
Carole Jenny, MD, Head of the Division of Child Maltreatment at Brown University, within a 1994 Pediatrics article titled “Are Children at Risk for Sexual Abuse by Homosexuals?”
That’s what I was thinkin’. I lose track of his vacillations…
I demonstrated that you did not even have the most basic understanding of the demands put on an author in the publishing industry.
***************
Exactly how did you “prove” that you had published four books.
****************
By the way, you claimed to have published five books.
*****************
Do try to keep your lies straight. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/79e95c895ad0085315a1d4b010ba110077991f0c129e82990a85ff2fcbd05f64.jpg
Source please.
*********************
In a separate reply, please respond to, ” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
Too many homosexuals for that number to be true.
******************
We’ve already established that you cannot accurately represent the content of a scholarly article.
******************
By the way, ” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
We’re just getting started on you.
*************************
Your first step to being rid of us is to answer the question asked.
*************************
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
Now you are not even trying.
********************
Answer the question.
********************
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
I remember when you lied about being your “friend” Brian.
******************
Answer the question.
******************
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
The question asked was:
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
Here’s the question again, Shep: How many boys have you molested?
Here is a map of all the allegations of heterosexual men who molest boys dating back to 1957. I’m sure your “troop” is one of them:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
You pedophiles have always been allowed into the Boy Scouts. Therefore, your question is a moot one. Pedophiles needed no argument to infiltrate the Boy Scouts, since you have infested it since 1957:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Here’s your answer, Shep:
You pedophiles have always been openly allowed into the Boy Scouts since 1957. Here’s a map showing which troops have known pedophiles:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Pedophiles needed no arguments, you’ve always been allowed to serve as Boy Scout leaders, and have done so since 1957:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Pedophiles are allowed as Boy Scout leaders, and have been since 1957:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Heterosexual pedophiles have been serving as Boy Scout leaders since 1957:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Here’s your source:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
I proved you were a liar, that’s how.
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Shep, I’m narrowing in on you and your secrets. I have googled “Oklahoma Boy Scouts sex abuse scandal” and your name keeps appearing. You don’t really want me to post the facts about you, do you?
Just ask me….
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Did you also molest boys in Alaska? I can dig a little deeper and get to the facts of your secret life. It’s not a secret anymore, Shep. You cannot escape the facts. You will be caught.
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Dear Mr. “I Wipe Man-Shit Off My Penis”,
Have you heard of the terms ‘latent homosexuality?’ These guys are fags (like you) and they deny it to themselves up until their breaking point of sticking a tiny, limp boy cock in their mouth. Why would you listen to their self-identification anyway? They’re insane. How do serial killers self-identify? As Christian? Oooh, bad Christianity….There is no way some straight guy who whacks it to Kate Upton’s boobs also wants some tiny hairless balls in his mouth. NO WAY. You wouldn’t know about being straight anyway so that’s probably lost on you.
And no, I won’t ‘look it up myself’ because I can already tell that it’s just leftist homos trying to pin the worst sin on their enemies (cis-gendered heteronormatives.) Go back to your stink parties.
LATENT HOMOSEXUALITY. Look it up.
Nope, not even close. That still doesn’t take into account the fact that homosexual men are not attracted to femininity, and therefore would not be attracted to prepubescent boys, who are indistinguishable from females at that age.
I was born a proud homosexual, this is true. Calling me fag is really immature, don’t you think, breeder boy?
And, since eight times as many women have receptive anal sex as gay men, the chances of you having poo on your pee pee are double that of my chances. Wipe the blood off your lips and penis. At least my husband doesn’t bleed on my penis like your girlfriend does.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_sex
I want an explanation as to why you think any homosexual male would be attracted to a boy. I’ll wait.
Boys have the following physical characteristics, which are far more feminine than masculine:
smooth soft skin
hairless bodies
hairless faces
a penis incapable of an erection
a high pitched whining voice very similar to that of a woman (in fact, women are used in the show To Catch a Predator to pose as young boys to lure in prospective child molesters. Women and boys are interchangeable).
Use your brain. Boys exhibit exactly zero masculine characteristics, dumb breeder boy. Go drive your girlfriend to the abortion clinic, if she’s not already at the battered women’s shelter.
Heteronormative? You’re anything but normal mentally. Explain to me why 100 percent of mass shooters are heterosexual males. Explain why 98 percent of child molesters are heterosexual males. Explain why one in four women is physically abused by a heterosexual male and one in five is raped. Explain why 90 percent of violent criminals are heterosexual males. You people anything but normal. I was born gay, and I always knew I was normal, and going on a mass shooting will certainly not make me feel any more normal. You need help. You are mentally ill….
For one thing, 98% of males are heterosexual anyway, so there’s always that. But your claim that 98% of men who commit a homosexual act are heterosexual defies the very logic of the sentence. Homosexuals commit homosexual acts. It’s pretty simple. To redefine homosexuality just to appear innocent of pederasty is a cheap cop out. (Oops, I mentioned ‘cops.’ Don’t get excited.)
How about this?
100% of men who commit homosexual pedophilia are ‘homosexual pedophiles’. It seems that would hold up to logical scrutiny.
This freedom to ‘identify’ as something you’re not is the ultimate in leftist childish, sandbox caliber fantasy. Soon, ‘white males’ will be truly blamed for everything which is the jealousy-driven leftist utopia anyway. You can be a black female pedophile/murderer and just identify as a ‘straight white male’ if you want to.
“…is really immature, don’t you think, dumb breeder boy?”
Hilarious.
“I want an explanation as to why you think any homosexual male would be attracted to a boy. I’ll wait.”
….Because they’re homosexual?
All those nine year old boys working as body doubles for Kate Upton…okay
Please answer Shep’s question.
I’d rather be stupid than a dishonest sack of the end process of digestion.
1a. Molestetion is about sexual attraction. Pain and control enters areas of abuse and bullying.
1b. You are right, because most female rape victims are older women who hold power, like politicians, judges etc. Or?
2a. Gay pride parade has a lot of manly men dressed in masculine ways, right.
2.b.So I guess fucking a goat does not make one a zoophile, because sheep have so feminine meeh meehs?
Someone needed to say this.
Nicely put. He certainly can be an aggravating little bitch.
he disappeared? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/afc50fca262e7b240c398ba6b7dfc09411b03a8b156a3a8ffa6aef00ee92a063.jpg
He can’t argue with that. I would not be surprised if he pulled down his own comments.
*******************
My friends and I have been trying to lure this creep to ROK for years. We knew DJBJ would get the verbal beating he so richly deserved once he arrived.
He keeps careful track of his Vaseline. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1b6fbcf1cc162f4d98b56ace2edf8e6594dd884c6cfd94c01259ba40e0c2eca6.jpg
Ha ha Guess I should have typed that with my teef in.
He did, but Fool Killer has been interacting with him since then on another thread.
Halfway. He is also Snow Cipher.
Well, our government certainly does. Here is a pic of a former victimizer of at-risk, under-aged, drug-addicted, runaway boys who also happens to be a current postage stamp model. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/815d21903f99ee8e7cd4b1e3de522ad7848c7963f8b3d8dcea6b97ae739638b1.jpg
Thats amazing- I watched that movie, dont remember anything about that. I do remember Brolin playing a religious “nut” however…
That is what his own friends said about him.
****************
I guess it didn’t fit the script the film producers wanted for us to see.
Shep, your sick sexual fantasies are beyond repulsive.
Rescuing runaway gay youth from the street and giving them homes and access to education and health care is not and never was “victimizing” them. It is the sick delusion of your kind to think that gay men cannot rescue gay youth from the streets without sexually abusing them. You think that because given the chance you would abuse those kids yourselves. You falsely accuse from the darkness of your own hearts.
…
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d96687186052337a6189db1e0681f0a65095fa1027bdef01b55acc419d7d1d1e.png
The description I gave came directly from Harvey Milk’s friends.
****************
He provided them with drugs. Is that something you advocate as well?
****************
They were not all gay. Some traded homo sex for drugs. Do you advocate that as well?
****************
At least one committed suicide. You should look up what Harvey the Hero had to say to his parents.
****************
Harvey Milk was a sexual predator who thought his actions were excusable because of the “gay culture”.
****************
So are you.
I wondered where you had gone.
*********************
Everything I wrote was accurate. The description was taken directly from authors friendly to Harvey Milk.
So is your obsession with a certain Pennsylvania politician, “Brian.”
What’s wrong with that? He’s a great guy, and a good friend of mine.
Explain your obsession with Obama.
I have alerted the FBI to your child molestation. You’ll be hearing from them soon, Shep.
Milk was no child molester. The boys he had sex with were of the same age that girls can legally marry in most states. That’s a fact, Shep.
Why do you lie?
Milk never had sex with any prepubescent boy. If he had, he would have been arrested. He was never arrested. Why, Shep?
Nope, repeated attempt to educate conservative morons like you.
Here goes again:
Perpetrators of Sexual Assault
The majority of perpetrators of sexual violence are
men. Studies of sexual assault against children and
young adolescents report that more than 97% of perpetrators were male. Despite popular belief, most
male perpetrators identify themselves as heterosexual and often have consensual sexual relationships with women. One study notes that 98% of male perpetrators self-identify as heterosexual
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pdf
So it is OK to victimize at-risk, drug-addicted, runaway boys.
*****************
You and Snow Cipher ought to start a club.
******************
Maybe you plan is to simply join the Boy Scouts. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d728c4089f967d8a651dc500cce1b09eeb1ab9f94e7ca230b7b8b8889da00d51.gif
Sorry, Milk didn’t victimize anyone. Nice attempt. Fail.
Since I have no interest in boys sexually, I would logically have no interest in joining the Boy Scouts and going on “camping” trips. The question is, why did you join, Shep? Secret?
…to teach boys to avoid sick fucks like you. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/59e56766108f24d10360c33f65029bbecd2eb2c4b68ae9f136b87c30f70b1246.jpg
He didn’t give drugs to otherwise hetero boys in order to obtain sex?
*******************
You know you’re lying.
I wasn’t there, you weren’t there, so how the hell do know any of this?
Did any heterosexual man ever give drugs to a girl to obtain sex?
Oh, I forget, there’s such a thing as prostitutes. Never mind.
Your cartoons are increasingly pathetic.
I teach all children to avoid heterosexual males. Why?
Heterosexual males represent merely 48 percent of the population, but commit 98 percent of all child molestations.
That’s why.
“Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
*****************
This was the question.
******************
Answer it.
“”Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?””
*********************
This is the question you don’t want to answer.
“Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
*************************
Why don’t you answer the question.
Still wating for you to answer the question.
********************************
“Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
I answered that question three times, Shep.
I answered it three times, Shep
Quit changing the subject.
***************************
“Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
****************************
Answer the question.
Pedophiles are already in the Boy Scouts. You’re one of them.
Answered it, multiple times.
Not interested in your troll game.
“Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
*************************
Answer the question.
Your bogus citation does not answer the question.
*************************
“Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
Shepper, I’d like to thank you and your conservative friends for making my marriage possible. Without your hateful and ignorant bans, we would have never been able to marry so quickly in all 50 states.
Well done, morons!
Obama now?
***********************
Answer the original question.
************************
“Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
Answer my question first:
Why do you conservatives pretend to be Obama?
I answered your silly question multiple times now.
Since the majority of men who prey on young boys are heterosexual, it would appear that boys are safer with homosexual Scout leaders. The question is, why would anyone want to be involved in such a silly organization? What a waste of time.
If you want to put your penis in a boys anus, by definition you are not a heterosexual.
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
**************
You have not answered it.
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
*******************
Still waiting.
Source for that please.
********************
Meanwhile, answer this question.
********************
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
The question was not about in which states you could marry.
*******************
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
What about the boy who killed himself?
So we need a homosexual who patronized under aged prostitutes (your word) on a postage stamp because…
Hmmm…
*********
The question was…
*********
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
Still sticking with that lie?
*************
Anyway, the question was, ” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
I asked first.
*****************
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
Not yet.
******************
” Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
Pedophiles have always served as Boy Scout leaders, there were never any restrictions on them. The restrictions were on homosexuals, who are known to not be pedophiles. 98 percent of child molesters are heterosexual males:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
I answered you about ten times now:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Pedophiles already serve in the Boy Scouts, and have done so openly since 1957:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Answer:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Harvey Milk didn’t patronize prostitutes. You made that shit up.
You mean the homosexual boy that was taunted by heterosexual morons, like you, and thus killed himself?
Pedophiles already serve in the Boy Scouts. No argument needed:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Answer:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
No argument needed. It’s a hypothetical question which doesn’t require an answer. Pedophiles have always served as Boy Scout leaders:
http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/10/terrifying-map-boy-scout-sexual-abuse-allegations/58202/
Answered this. See above
Wrong. 98 percent of men who put their penis into a boy by force are heterosexual. By definition.
“Infiltrate” is so pejorative a term in your question as to render the question too offensive to discuss. It only serves to indict you for the rotten bigot that you are.
I’m not going to get into the sorted details of Harvey Milk, not being a fan of that individual myself. I will venture to say, however, that fanatics like you always overstate your case against the targets of your loathing. So, my guess is that only about 25% of your accusations against Milk are even partially true and the rest is just gossip, unfounded speculation, and bald-faced lies, because that’s what people like you do. However, since you seem bent on slandering gays everywhere in the name of Harvey Milk, I probably should actually read up on the guy from an untainted source. (That would most definitely not be you and your holy roller fanatics club.)
That’s what self-hating, in-the-closet Evangelicals do. They project perverse sexual fantasies onto other people because they have no venue for sexual experiences they can live with. They have to try to make everyone else into someone to hate to justify their self-hatred.
Thanks for clarifying. I never paid much attention to Milk. I guess I owe it to myself to find out more about him. If the Evangelicals hate him enough to slander him, he probably was a pretty good guy.
Nice banner. Thanks for posting it. It’s sure a nice variation on the traditional American Flag. Obviously, no one but haters like you have a problem with it being waved in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.
That’s sadly how that usually goes. When I taught in Utah 20+ years ago, one of my students put a gun in his mouth and pulled the trigger. He could not reconcile being gay and Mormon. 33 years in the classroom, and the only suicide I ever had to deal with among my students was a gay Mormon teen who felt tortured by just living.
Mormons and holy rollers are like sick peas in a pod on that one, aren’t they? They emotionally torture gay boys into killing themselves and then blame everyone else.
Notice that gay predators are just 2% of total reported predators, even lower than the general population. That’s why there are so many Josh Duggars out there getting closer to God by raping their own sisters.
Stop projecting, you Sodomite!
Sodomy is sick and perverted, whether the boys were under-age or not. Filthy Sodomite!
Provide proof that Shep is a pedophile, you whoremongering Sodomite! Oh wait, you have ZERO evidence! I rebuke you in the name of JESUS CHRIST!
He is a coward, Shep. Don’t waste your time with this low-life.
So straight, normal people are morons? I don’t support bullying, but Sodomites are disgusting people! You need JESUS!
So apparently, wanting boys to grow up normal, is torture? I dislike Mormons, but you are crazy.
Helping boys kill themselves is not normal. You miss the point because you are the nut.
I imagined it. So gross!
This tinker bell overnight posted four replies to a single comment of mine not even addressed to him but did not respond to two comments directly addressing his assertions. The “dude” is disturbed.
The word would be “sordid” and you should be fully acquainted with it judging by your deviant lifestyle.
So, what did they do? Tie him up and waterboard him? Shove bamboo slivers under his fingernails? Make him watch Welcome Back Kotter?
Oh yeah!
*****************
Several of us have had dealings with him prior to meeting you.
*****************
At least this time he didn’t get into his sicko views of women. He has a special hatred for our Infa.
100% of my very carefully chosen words were accurate, and said by friends of Harvey Milk.
******************
By the way, you are the very definition of a bigot for making your unfounded assumption that I am a “…holy roller…”.
You’re the bigot here.
****************
“…holy roller…”
I was slowly getting to respond to tinker bell’s other posts but honestly just a waste of time it would have been.
He offed his own sorry faggot ass, Tinkerbell. Religion had nothing to do with it.
Pederasts of a feather must stick together, eh Tinkerbell?
Ah, but he’s followed me to another site. This usually goes on for around 6 weeks, or until his meds are adjusted.
I saw that. Advise him to look up Mr G for some “coaching sessions” the predator boasted of holding with this population. I’m sure it’s hands on so it will occupy the tinker bell for sometime.
Keep your feathers to yourself, and all other unwanted Leprechaun parts, Darby O’Gill.
Still compensating for being less than a real man, Darby O’Gill, are we?
So, intolerance of bigotry is itself bigoted? Nice. No cigar. But very cute.
Word-smithing BS is what holy rollers do best. They have to. Their version of Christianity is garbage spun from pure BS. But even there, you are weak.
Yes, of course, I forgot. Mormons are actually civilized in their tortures of gay youth, compared with you holy rollers.
This “deviant” has been married to the same woman for 35 of his 60 years on the planet. Pretty wild stuff to have just one partner in all that time. We have 3 kids and 6 grandkids. I don’t smoke, gamble, do drugs, or visit holy roller churches. Wild stuff.
Don’t you GLBTSTFU supremacists ever get tired of being the worst, anti-American bigots there are? Where did I say I’m a Christian?
Just say “no” to your cultural Marxism manipulators. :o)
You must be closet gay to keep accusing others of it. Either that or you’re just stupid.
Clichéd much?
So, I guess I guessed correctly. Avoidance rather than denial.
Yeah. Ya’ got me!
…and away he went.
**********************
Impressive.
Don’t want to “get you.” Good thing I kept my receipt so that you can go back to the store.
Look up what Randy Shiltz, Milk’s friend, wrote about him.
******************
Shiltz used every adjective I did to describe Milk’s victims, and even described Milk’s depredations as “unfortunate”.
******************
Several other friends of Milk offered similar descriptions of his sick behavior, but Shiltz used each of the words I used.
No, you bigot, it is not that I am a “holy roller”, I am not even a Christian.
*********************
Twice now your bigotry has compelled you to put me into a category where I don’t belong, where you have no reason to believe I belong, simply so you can dismiss me.
**********************
You display a great economy of thought, which is to say that you don’t spend much time thinking. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e37d9f536b78260db15f48f48d60b24ba8efcef7d9a9775da17618b07699591b.jpg
If that’s you, at least you are a good-looking bigot.
When I have the time to look up Milk, I’ll find my own sources, thank you.
Nice. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
100% of my descriptors for Milky the Molester can be found in the writings of his friend and well known homosexual journalist Randy Shiltz.
*******************
No need for an untainted source. Shiltz loved the guy and still documented his rapacious behavior. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
…and yet you take no offense at DG “the liar” JC’s assertion that 100% of BSA molesters were heterosexuals…
*****************
What is wrong with you? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
Rescuing runaways?
Maybe in the same way pimps rescue/exploit runaway girls of the same age.
**********************
Giving them homes?
He turned them into prostitutes, paid with drugs and demanded sex as a form of rent.
**********************
Access to education?
WTF? Is this part of some sick fantasy on your part about paying some boys tuition? Milk didn’t even do that much.
**********************
Health care?
Did he take them to the free clinic to clear up any infections they had prior to him victimizing them? What he hell are you talking about?
***********************
Not all of those youth were gay. He is documented to have coerced otherwise heterosexual boys to engage in homo sex for drugs and a place to stay.
***********************
I volunteer about 1600 hours per year to work with kids. I’ve been putting in this many hours for at least 8 years. It would never in a million years occur to me to make sexual demands on a person of any age in my charge.
***********************
Milk on the other hand started from the idea that he would obtain sex from these youths, and then he set about doing whatever he needed to do to ensnare them.
***********************
And when he was done, he discarded them with no more thought than he would have given to throwing away a soiled tissue.
***********************
You are defending the indefensible.
************************
What is your motivation?
R A N D Y
S H I L T Z
**************
Milk’s friend.
**************
I know there is no way in Hell you’ll be reporting back here about what you find. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
1.) I’m not that good looking.
2.) You’re still not addressing your bigotry.
3.) You’ll never get over your bigotry until you admit you have a problem. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
Have you noticed how similar Snow Cipher’s writing style is to our favorite little werehomo?
How many boys did Harvey Milk provide the same sort of help to kill themselves?
*****************
Was it normal for boys to kill themselves after Milk discarded them?
You know, DJ “The Liar” JC also told me that he never paid much attention to Milk.
*******************
It is amazing how much you guys have in common.
Thankfully, no one has to account to a conspiracy nut, like you. You can go away now.
Wow! You are misrepresenting that same study in exactly the same manner DG “The Liar” CJ does.
*********************
Hmmmmmmmmmm…
*********************
I guess that two guys could have read it incorrectly in exactly the same manner, but our old buddy Occam probably has a more parsimonious explanation for what is going on here.
Go stalk someone else. You’ve passed the point of being boring.
you can go now. Bye
Yawn. Not interested in your self-injected nonsense. Bye.
For a hetero you sure seem to have a deep understanding of homo fantasy life…
***********************
We all know this one werehomo who has a similar understanding of homo fantasy life as well.
************************
Hmmmmm….
You really can go away. Bye.
This sure sounds like a homo fantasy version of what actually happened.
**********************
Are you sure you’re hetero?
**********************
DG “The Liar” CJ, izzis you?
You know, DG “The Liar” CJ is very fond of using that unusual word, “holy roller”.
******************
Hmmmmmmm….
Wow. DG “The Liar” CJ uses an identical method when he is attempting do dismiss people.
*******************
What a coincidence!
*******************
Hmmmmm…
What straight man calls his wife a “partner”?
******************
DG “The Liar” JC, why do you lie?
Wow.
*********************
GD “The Liar” CJ is quite fond of that same, rarely used, term “pejorative”.
*********************
What a coincidence!
*********************
Hmmm….
Here we are back to DG “The Liar’s” CJ’s form of dismissal.
******************
Oh come on now. Just admit you use your phone for your DGCJ ID and your home computer for your Snow Cipher ID.
You really can’t respond to my points.
*********************
You’re busted. We know it is you DGCJ.
*********************
Your compulsion to reply even when you don’t have anything to add is yet another tell.
*********************
Give it up.
Truth hurts too much? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
Not interested in the easily obtainable truth is more like it. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
Sooo…
***************
It is easier for you to attempt to dismiss me than it is to deal honestly with your bigotry, DG? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
Truth hurts, don’t it? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
How many boys were driven to suicide by the well documented pederast Harvey Milk?
It is so clear because it is written by your own hand. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
If you use the term “stalk” one more time I’ll start flagging your posts stupid. This is uncalled for since you are the one berating others here while “engaging” them. Get it?
That’s a sad thing to consider.
Hi Shep. Snow Cipher has an interesting posting history:
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/guyswithiphones/httpguyswithiphonescom201510367441/#comment-2285091758
Don’t forget that you are also a closet homosexual:
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/guyswithiphones/httpguyswithiphonescom201510367441/#comment-2285091758
Do you keep count of how many “praising” posts you make on that blog’s thread(s). Your “wife” must be proud.
Who the hell is calling Shep a pedophile???
In the words of Bonquiqui, “I will cut you!” What douchebag is saying this?? I will take a chunk out of that ass, that will never heal! grrrr
Some guy that got banned.
Is there anything more pathetic than a homosexual who pretends to be straight in order to sell the flawed homosexual agenda to straight people?
**********************
Hey Snow! Remember posting this a couple of days ago?
**********************
**********************
Just a little background for the folks: He posted this on a site where homos post pictures of their genitalia for review by other homos.
***********************
Posting histories can be a real bear, can’t they sweet pea!
So DG “The Liar” CJ…
******************
Did you forget you were using your “straight” person (Snow Cipher) when you posted the following on the gay selfie site?
******************
********************
For those of you who won’t go to the site, it features pics of men taking nude selfies.
********************
It looks as if Jubal’s analysis of your deeply disturbed psyche was completely accurate.
Well thank you for sharing Thomas. That identity is so completely debunked that it might as well commit troll sepuku.
********************
I’ll be sure you reuse the blockquotes from both sites everytime I encounter this corksoaker.
DG “The Liar” CJ.
******************
You’ve been around long enough to have seen him before. His threads always degenerate into the idea that it is OK for homosexual Scoutmasters to have sex with 15 year old Scouts if no age of consent laws are broken.
*******************
He has been using an alternative identity, “Snow Cypher” to post here.
******************
Snow Cypher claims to be a heterosexual family man. Check my previous 4 or 5 posts. Thomas caught him posting on a homosexual selfie site. He was describing how much he liked some guy’s nude pic.
******************
Shauna, is there anything more pathetic than a homosexual who pretends to be straight in order to improve his standing with heterosexuals so that the homofascist agenda can be advanced?
******************
Sick and pathetic.
Hi Elven,
Thank you for replying. I was reading the Disqus Digest and saw the comment. I am happy to know this weirdo is banned. Sooo, as I came busting in like Yosemite Sam, I’ll happy dance, and shuffle out like James Brown! 😉
God speed!
Whoa, Just saw this, just got back from DC…Know I got your 6!
Shep, please copy the statement, where this freak said it was ok to have sex with under aged kids. I’ll make sure he ROTS in prison or is investigated for sure. I just called someone to start checking the profile. My guess he probably has kiddy porn on his computer. GRR, If it were up to me he would be a dead pedophile. The law will handle it.
Shep, as a side note. Your highly educated and trying to reason with someone who is sick. You can’t help this person. On occasion, I let someone get under my skin and piss me off, (Dutch person), but then realize, these people have Mommy or Daddy issues and/or some mental illness and no matter what you do or say, you can’t help them or reason with them. It’s a waste of time. There are lots of disturbed people on here Shep, but some really good ones too, like this gang! 😉 It’s what keeps me coming back. Let Infa know I have her 6 too! Get me that info Shep, post it and I’ll copy it and send it to proper authorities. Pedophiles make me sick.
Will find it and let you know. He didn’t explicitly say it, but he certainly got there and beyond with his implications.
**********************
He’s not under my skin. I hope I did not give you that impression. I am just not interested in letting his propaganda stand. Our friends have of course engaged in countering his propaganda as well.
Follow this post back.
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/21stcenturywire/8216do_you_realise_what_you8217ve_done8217_8211_putin_pulverizes_western_actions_in_syria_at_unga/#comment-2285142561
You will clearly see where DG “The Liar” CJ and Snow “Homosexual Fantasy” Cypher (they are the same person) implied that it would be fine for Scoutmasters to have sex with Scouts so long as no age-of-consent laws were broken.
********************
Click on my posts for yesterday and today. Follow the threads back up for 10 or so posts. This effer is really effin’ sick. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6fbbab1fde39b442b9ea5b50ebd327054d8fa3a8144b35a6e965ffc0cc95d705.jpg
Thank you!
Hiya Shep….
Wanted to touch base, before I turn in. My panties are in a wad now..stuff like this simply pisses me off. ANYWAY, just forwarded all the info and will wait to see what direction they want to go. so, this troll, claims to be married with a female wife and children, and he is making the statement that it’s ok for him to have sex with underage babies. ????
Shep, a bit exhausted, so I just want to clarify, this is his position.
********************************************
My boyfriend is making a surprise visit to me this week. My peeps, shifted my work around to spend time with him, as the Holidays get crazy for both of us. We both travel quite a bit. This was a wonderful surprise. ANYWAY, I WILL, make sure your updated, it just might be a few days. LOL… Shep, don’t let this loser get under your skin. They get off on this stuff, it makes them happy to upset normal people, who live decent life’s, and have happy families. These people are sick, and YOU sir, are decent, normal, happy, good to your family and just awesome! For now? point and laugh at the pathetic, sick, empty, disgusting, sludge, they spew. YOUR so FAR above it. nighty night
Yes, to your question, so long as no age of consent laws are broken.
******************
This troll claims to be married for decades with children and grandchildren, and then the very next day he is on a homo selfie site complementing some guy on his nude pic.
******************
Just so you know, this troll is the same person as DGJC. He is not under my skin.
******************
He hasn’t posted for a couple of days, so he is probably in jail. When he gets out we can expect one of his spectacular grand-mal-hissy-fits (hat tip Infa).
******************
With DGCJ/Snow Cypher, the conversation A L W A Y S degenerates to it being acceptable for a Scoutmaster to have sex with the boys, so long as the boys are over the age of consent in that jurisdiction.
*******************
What a sick duck.
I have witnessed a miracle of God! Would you like to hear about it?
Sure
Hi Shep, just popping in to let you know I haven’t heard back from my friend. I usually hear back right away. Chances are they are rooting around in his computer. I’ll let you know if I hear back.
Thanks!
To put a long story short, I have a guardian angel. He is huge, and stands at 8 feet tall. He has long, beautiful blond hair that looks like gold. He is very handsome, and has European/Caucasian facial features. He has very bright skin, that glows with white light. He wears a long white robe that comes down to his calves. The sleeves of his robe reach down to his wrists. On his feet, he wears a pair of tan leather sandals.
On his back, he has wings made of white fire, that glow golden at the edges. Most of the time, in his hands he would hold a flaming sword. It looks like a European longsword, but the blade is covered in orange fire. Other times, when he would sing to me, he would play a large silver harp.
The kid played by Emil Hirsch was underage, a teen “rent boy” – easy to miss, since the film lionized Milk and certainly didn’t condemn his attraction to underage runaway addicts. The film made it seem like the kid was just a sassy gay younger brother
About 80% !
Nope 98 percent of child molesters are heterosexual males and 70 percent of victims are girls, moron!
Actual research shows the opposite is true:
I’ve always known that the Boys Scouts was a haven for heterosexual men who molest boys. Who needs NAMBLA when you can join the Boy Scouts of America and go on “camping” trips with boys?
http://www.wcvb.com/news/rabbi-boy-scout-leader-among-70-arrested-in-new-york-porn-case/26093070
http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2014/06/former_teacher_boy_scout_leade.html
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2014/06/13/former-phoenix-boy-scout-leader-arrested-abrk/10460051/
http://www.nbc29.com/story/20208948/former-boy-scout-troop-leader-arrested-on-forcible-sodomy-charge
http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/crime-law/cub-scout-troop-leader-arrested-sex-crime-charges/nfRhR/
http://www.lex18.com/news/former-boy-scout-speaks-out-about-twins-arrested-for-child-porn/
http://www.wdsu.com/news/local-news/new-orleans/sheriff-former-boy-scout-leader-teacher-accused-of-child-porn-sexual-battery-rape-involving-children/26696954
And the irony is that homosexuals have never been allowed to serve as leaders in the Boy Scouts, and 100 percent of these molesters were heterosexual males. One story involves a heterosexual man and his girlfriend who molested boys together! Oh the depravity!
Wrong!!
Child molesters can be divided into two types: “fixated” and
“regressed.” The fixated offender is attracted primarily to children and has
little or no interest in adult relationships; such a person is known in clinical
terms as a “pedophile.” The regressed offender is interested in and capable of
adult sexual relationships; however, this person may on occasion regress to
sexual encounters with children, often as a result of difficulties and
frustration in his adult relationships
In general, fixated child molesters are drawn to children sexually in that they
identify with the child and appear in some ways to want to remain children
themselves. It is for this reason that the trend for fixated offenders is to
target boys as victims. . . . They see the boy as a projected representation of
themselves. They feel themselves to be more child than adult and therefore find
themselves more comfortable (especially sexually) in the company of children.
The second type of offender, the regressed offender, is predominantly
heterosexual. However, he may temporarily turn to boys or girls as a result of
complications in his adult relations. Although regressed offenders are more
likely to choose girls than boys as victims what attracts the regressed male
offender to boys are the feminine characteristics of pre‑ pubescents.
Researchers found no cases of boy molestation in which the offender had an
adult homosexual orientation.
These same individuals are uninterested in adult homosexual
relationships. In fact, they frequently express a strong sexual aversion to
adult males, reporting that what they find attractive about the immature boy
are his feminine features and the absence of secondary sexual characteristics
such as body hair and muscles.”
The majority of perpetrators of sexual violence are men. Studies of sexual assault against children and young adolescents report that more than 97% of perpetrators were male. Despite popular belief, most male perpetrators identify themselves as heterosexual and often have consensual sexual relationships with women. One study notes that 98% of male perpetrators self-identify as heterosexual. Source: Male Survivors of Sexual Violence, state of Michigan
Yupp… I believe you ?? You must be a caring, concerned tolerant person …………..
Thank you! I appreciate your support. There are so many ignorant conservatives on this site, it’s nice to know there is one that isn’t. They simply ignore the facts. The fact remains that most men who molest boys are in fact heterosexual:
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pdf
Perpetrators of Sexual Assault
The majority of perpetrators of sexual violence are
men. Studies of sexual assault against children and
young adolescents report that more than 97% of perpetrators were male. Despite popular belief, most
male perpetrators identify themselves as heterosexual and often have consensual sexual relationships with women. One study notes that 98% of male perpetrators self-identify as heterosexual
Wowww… The research showing 2% of male population as homosexual is flawed.. It must be the opposite ?? 2% are heterosexual & 98 % are repressed homosexuals ??
I say wowww…
Wow, you’re stupid. Did I say wow?
Research showing that the gay population is two percent absolutely is flawed. The gay population is not less than eight percent. This study says it’s closer to 20 percent:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/what-percent-of-the-population-is-gay-more-than-you-think-5012467/
That isn’t relevant to the fact that 48 percent of the population consists of heterosexual males, who commit 98 percent of all child molestations. In other words, the 51 percent of the population that is either homosexual male or all females combined commits less than two percent of all child molestations. Wow, indeed!
There are indeed repressed homosexuals. I highly doubt that this study showing the gay population as twenty percent is accurate. I think the gay population is probably around eight percent, since eight percent of all male sheep are exclusively homosexual. That makes the most sense.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/what-percent-of-the-population-is-gay-more-than-you-think-5012467/
So I was exaggerating ?? 20% only of fudge packers ?? But 98 % of fudge packing with little boys ?? Humm…You got me there….
There are lies… there are damn lies.. & then there are statistics… LOL !
Remember VERITAS VINCIT !
Oops, eight times as many women have receptive anal sex as gay men:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_sex
I think you should look in the mirror when you use the pejorative “fudgepacker.”
Your last comments are so stupid as to hardly be worthy of comment. You heterosexual males really are cognitively challenged, aren’t you? It’s true what they say in the gay community. I thought it was a gay urban legend.
At least my husband doesn’t drip blood on my penis, right Mr Bloodsucker?
98 percent of humans who molest little boys are heterosexual males. It’s not my opinion, that’s what research shows, and this government document:
http://michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pdf
You should ask your fellow heterosexual Jerry Sandusky why he molested little boys. I happen to know why. Do you? Child molestation has nothing to do with sex. The goal isn’t an orgasm. Child molesters, like the heterosexual Jerry Sandusky, get their thrills by dominating and exerting power over a victim. It’s about control, and has absolutely nothing to do with sex. Jerry Sandusky is attracted to women. Why did he molest boys? He had access to girls in the locker room at his school where he was a sports coach. He did not have access to girls. Most child molesters molest both genders, and don’t seem to have a preference. Pedophiles, on the other hand, prefer girls to boys 11 to 1, when they have a preference. Most of them don’t have a preference. Both genders are the same to them. Why? Because prepubescent boys and girls are identical in every physical way and behaviorally as well.
O.K. I’m not going to use anymore the words “fudge packers” I’ll use just the one of the normal word..Sodomist & poofter !
Oy Vey light up …
I think you wounded his inner child with that comment.
********************
I’m sure he is comforting himself with cupcakes as we speak.
cupcakes or twinks………i mean twinkies
Third degree burn, through and through.
;-D
The facts do not agree with that at all. In fact, most men who molest boys are heterosexual and 70 percent of victims are girls:
Child molesters can be divided into two types: “fixated” and
“regressed.” The fixated offender is attracted primarily to children and has
little or no interest in adult relationships; such a person is known in clinical
terms as a “pedophile.” The regressed offender is interested in and capable of
adult sexual relationships; however, this person may on occasion regress to
sexual encounters with children, often as a result of difficulties and
frustration in his adult relationships
In general, fixated child molesters are drawn to children sexually in that they
identify with the child and appear in some ways to want to remain children
themselves. It is for this reason that the trend for fixated offenders is to
target boys as victims. . . . They see the boy as a projected representation of
themselves. They feel themselves to be more child than adult and therefore find
themselves more comfortable (especially sexually) in the company of children.
The second type of offender, the regressed offender, is predominantly
heterosexual. However, he may temporarily turn to boys or girls as a result of
complications in his adult relations. Although regressed offenders are more
likely to choose girls than boys as victims what attracts the regressed male
offender to boys are the feminine characteristics of pre‑ pubescents.
Researchers found no cases of boy molestation in which the offender had an
adult homosexual orientation.
These same individuals are uninterested in adult homosexual
relationships. In fact, they frequently express a strong sexual aversion to
adult males, reporting that what they find attractive about the immature boy
are his feminine features and the absence of secondary sexual characteristics
such as body hair and muscles.”
The majority of perpetrators of sexual violence are men. Studies of sexual assault against children and young adolescents report that more than 97% of perpetrators were male. Despite popular belief, most male perpetrators identify themselves as heterosexual and often have consensual sexual relationships with women. One study notes that 98% of male perpetrators self-identify as heterosexual. Source: Male Survivors of Sexual Violence, state of Michigan
“In fact, most men who molest boys are heterosexual and 70 percent of victims are girls:”
**********************
I would expect better English from a published author like yourself.
***********************
Or have you dropped that lie too? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/38c8d7bf9e018869dd37f3dabcb13a2c85b96dc6a6801e39ef3ba520b265a029.jpg
I love it when trolls are uapologetically math challenged.
You:
“The facts do not agree with that at all. In fact, most men who molest boys are heterosexual and 70 percent of victims are girls:”
If you gave real statistics, I’d have a better critique. But let’s just go with what you have provided and acknowledge that there are some assumptions in it.
If true, it shows what an astounding grasp of the obvious you have there skippy. Most of the people in a room will be responsible for most of what happens in it. Pointing to the majority of offenders in defense of the minority can be very stupid (and deceitfully confusing) thing to do.
So, 5% (generous) of the population are responsible for 30% of the offenses? Personally, I’d put that 5% on predator watch. It is the only sane and sensible thing to do.
Skippy, 98 percent of men who molest boys are heterosexual. Reading isn’t your strong suit, is it? The chances that a boy’s molester is a homosexual are two percent. It’s as if you’ve never heard of Jerry Sandusky.
Get a clue
What’s wrong with this English?
“In fact, most men who molest boys are heterosexual and 70 percent of victims are girls:”
Answer: Absolutely nothing.
The guy said that 80 percent of child molesters are homosexuals. That statement is quite simple to invalidate. Here was my response:
“In fact, most men who molest boys are heterosexual and 70 percent of victims are girls:”
Poor Shep. Outclassed yet again. All he can do is write in his antiquated old lady style, and get his friends to upvote his inane and vapid responses to my educational materials. Shep, if you could actually produce some evidence that gay men molest children, perhaps I’d respect you. Until then, you lost this debate soundly. I have tons of materials I can post here that prove that heterosexual men are more likely to molest a boy. I’ll start now:
Heterosexual men are more likely to molest boys than homosexual men, and
here’s why:
Child molestation and child abuse refer to “actions” without implying any
particular psychological makeup or motive. In other words, not all incidents
of
child abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles. Rather a
pedophile doesn’t experience
sexual desire for adults of either gender. They
usually don’t identify as
homosexual-the majority identify as heterosexual,
even those who abuse children
of the same gender. They are sexually aroused
by youth, not by gender. In contrast, child molesters often exert power and
control over children in an
effort to dominate them. They do experience
sexual desire for adults, but
molest children episodically, for reasons
apart from sexual desire, much as a
rapist enjoys power, violence and
controlling their humiliated victims. For
pedophiles the gender of the child
is immaterial. Accessibility is more the
factor in who a pedophile abuses.
Males often are given easier access to male
children. In trying to make
sense of an adult male’s sexually abusing a male child, many of us mislabel it
as an act of homosexuality, which it isn’t. To call child
molestation of a
boy by a man “homosexual” or of a girl by a man “heterosexual”
is to
misunderstand pedophilia. No true pedophile is attracted to adults, so
neither homosexuality nor heterosexuality applies. When men molest little
girls we call him a “pedophile” not a heterosexual. Of course, when a man
molests little boys people say outright he is a “homosexual.” It is because of
our society’s aversion to homosexuality,but it is wrong. In reality, abuse of
boys by gay pedophiles is extremely rare, and the abuse of girls by lesbians
rarer still.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-kort-phd/homosexuality-and-pedophi_b_1932622.html
Source: Homosexuality and Pedophilia, a false
link
I read fine, it helps me understand when someone is perverting a dialog through the unjustifiable re-definition of plain words. Your number is only true if you get to define “homosexual” sociologically or politically rather than literally. These men had homosexual sex with their victims and you wish to cull them out from other homosexuals because of their “Self identification”? A self-excusing and self-justifying self-awareness of a predator? You really think that people who only prey on children through homosexual sex are by some strange reasoning Hetero-sexual? That is absurd.
Sorry skippy. If straight males have to take responsibility for the little girl molesters in their ranks then the male homosexual classification owns the little boy molesters. All of your academic sophistry of explaining why men who really prefer girls but exclusively molest boys are really “heterosexual” is just bullshit. And self-serving bullshit at that. It does not pass the smell test.
The pathology you describe could equally explain the opposite case if you apply critical reasoning to their “Self-Identification” They could well be deceiving themselves or willfully deceiving everybody else. No, you wish to take their testimony at face-value because it serves your interest.
Mistake number one: having sex with a child is neither a homosexual nor heterosexual act. I did not write what is below. An expert did. Educate yourself:
Heterosexual men are more likely to molest boys than homosexual men, and
here’s why:
Child molestation and child abuse refer to “actions” without implying any
particular psychological makeup or motive. In other words, not all incidents
of
child abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles. Rather a
pedophile doesn’t experience
sexual desire for adults of either gender. They
usually don’t identify as
homosexual-the majority identify as heterosexual,
even those who abuse children
of the same gender. They are sexually aroused
by youth, not by gender. In contrast, child molesters often exert power and
control over children in an
effort to dominate them. They do experience
sexual desire for adults, but
molest children episodically, for reasons
apart from sexual desire, much as a
rapist enjoys power, violence and
controlling their humiliated victims. For
pedophiles the gender of the child
is immaterial. Accessibility is more the
factor in who a pedophile abuses.
Males often are given easier access to male
children. In trying to make
sense of an adult male’s sexually abusing a male child, many of us mislabel it
as an act of homosexuality, which it isn’t. To call child
molestation of a
boy by a man “homosexual” or of a girl by a man “heterosexual”
is to
misunderstand pedophilia. No true pedophile is attracted to adults, so
neither homosexuality nor heterosexuality applies. When men molest little
girls we call him a “pedophile” not a heterosexual. Of course, when a man
molests little boys people say outright he is a “homosexual.” It is because of
our society’s aversion to homosexuality,but it is wrong. In reality, abuse of
boys by gay pedophiles is extremely rare, and the abuse of girls by lesbians
rarer still.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-kort-phd/homosexuality-and-pedophi_b_1932622.html
Source: Homosexuality and Pedophilia, a false
link
Sorry that research shows you are wrong, and I am right. Gay men are not attracted to femininity. We are attracted to masculinity. Boys are more feminine than masculine. They have no body characteristics a homosexual man would find appealing. Use your brain. This is simple stuff. Why do heterosexual men in Afghanistan dress up small boys to look like women, if they don’t consider them feminine?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/dancingboys/
Ah, an appeal to authority. Tell me, If I have already determined that you are a bullshitter, then why would I not think you would quote other bullshitters? I would suspect you would stick to those on your bench.
Fine, quote from someone who states otherwise. Post a quote from a respected clinician which proves that men who molest boys are exclusively homosexual.
I’ll wait….
Nothing you have posted here has been anything except your opinion on this matter. Your opinion means absolutely nothing to me. I don’t post my opinion, I post what real scientists have to say on this issue. That’s why I’m a professor and you’re not.
Only makes sense when you get to cherry pick the definition of Homosexuality. What you have just laid out is a tautology.
Authority means: they know something.
Post something from an authority on the issue of child molestation. Otherwise, you haven’t got anything. You’re a typical low information conservative.
Nope, I have laid out the facts;
Homosexual men are not attracted to young boys. When heterosexual men project your obsession with teen girls onto gay men it does not work. We are not attracted to young boys and never will be. Stop projecting.
I’ve never met a gay man who was attracted to teen boys. Not one. We are attracted to masculinity. If you have ever been to a gay bar you will see what I mean. You will see more beards and mustaches than shaved faces. Why? We equate facial hair with masculinity. We are attracted to masculinity. We are not attracted to young boys. It’s quite simple.
In any case, molestation isn’t about attraction. Just like rape, it’s about control of a victim. Men who molest boys are not looking for an orgasm. They want to control someone. This is well documented and well studied.
You select what you chose to post or not. It is the expression of your opinion by selection, not by an uninterested authority. The certifications of those you cite says nothing about your reason for citing them. You can’t hide behind them. Do you plan to double post every comment of mine? Do you have no self control?
I’m waiting for you to post something which debunks or contradicts what I’ve posted.
So far: crickets.
Your opinion is meaningless to me. Got it?
All you’ve done is attack me, and you’ve been incapable of addressing the scientific evidence I’ve posted that proves that heterosexual men are more likely to molest boys than homosexual men.
Noted.
I make one last appeal to authority.
Please post evidence that gay men are more likely to molest a boy than a heterosexual man.
I’m waiting….
Did you notice that not one of you conservative anti-gays has been able to produce any evidence which disputes my claims? Why is that? Because you won’t find anything, unless you scour the anti-gay junk science that is spewed by Family Research Council, and other such hate groups. Those have nothing to do with actual science. They are meant ti discredit gay people and have zero science behind them.
Once again, please provide any evidence which discredits anything I’ve posted.
Meanwhile, here it is again:
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pdf
“I’ve never met a gay man who was attracted to teen boys” By your cherry picked definition of Gay. Truly, do you not see your own bias in this? And since you have decided to start triple posting comments of mine, you get ignored for the troll you are and I return you to the tender mercies of the folks of ROK. Have a really nice time. I pretty much said my piece.
You should just feel lucky that I haven’t started posting all the stats about the heterosexual lifestyle.
I could start with the fact that one in four women is abused and one in five is raped.
Shall I continue?
Truly you don’t see your own stupidity here? Jesus. First off, you’ve yet to produce ANY evidence that gay men are more likely to molest a boy. Secondly, you have yet to produce any evidence that a heterosexual man could not molest a boy. This seems to be your contention.
Produce evidence. Stop blowing your opinion out your ass. It’s meaningless to me.
Trolls disrupt intelligent debate in an attempt to divert from the topic at hand.
I’m an educator, not a troll. I have provided evidence that the Boy Scouts was full of heterosexual men who preyed on young boys. These men were not closeted homosexuals, they were not attracted to men, yet they molested young boys.
Prove otherwise.
You cannot.
Got it.
That’s why you attacked me instead of my message.
You don’t even know what a troll is
Noted.
I did not disrupt debate in an attempt to divert away from the topic at hand. My posts were germane to this article and to the discussion at hand. I’ve educated everyone on this thread that the majority of men who molest boys are heterosexual. Now you know.
Message:
Parents: keep your children away from heterosexual men. They are the true danger to your kids, not gay men.
When will one of you turd brains present any evidence which contradicts my facts?
Waiting…..
Like most conservative sites, I fully expect to be kicked off this site. Conservatives hate education and fear science. College professors, like me, are their mortal enemies. They thrive on low information voters who are uneducated. This thread is infested with them, with Shep being their leader.
Definition of gay:
A man or woman who is attracted to adults of the same sex. This is a biological characteristic, and not a choice.
Gay men are attracted to masculinity.
Gay women are attracted to femininity.
Boys are more feminine than masculine.
Therefore, gay men are highly unlikely to molest a boy or have any sexual interest in a boy.
Simple logic proves my point. No scientific evidence required.
Ha ha Alright, enough with the comedy trolling! :o)
These men were closeted homosexuals, they were not attracted to men, yet they molested young males. They were attracted to young MALES, compulsively. See how dumb that is when I imitate you?
I’ve never met a straight man who was attracted to teen boys. Not one. We are attracted to femininity. If you have ever been to a straight bar you will see what I mean. See how dumb that is when I imitate you?
You truly do not see what senseless drivel your reasoning is, do you? We don’t see them in either place because they are acting, blending in. I’ve probably seen many without knowing it in my haunts as I suspect you have as well in yours. Not seeing the not visible is not remarkable.
Yes, you seem dumb. Well done.
Men who molest boys are not homosexual. 98 percent of the time they are heterosexual. The rest of the two percent of victims are either molested by gay men or women.
Do
You
Understand?
I’ve been to straight bars. All I hear is conversations about beers, babes and “ball.”
It’s rather tedious.
I’m waiting for some scientific evidence that men who are attracted to men would molest a boy.
Waiting…..
I don’t troll, Cletus.
Why are you still pretending to be a black man?
I will never understand you people.
I understand your desperate need to repeat it over and over again. It does not make you right.
You still haven’t grasped that molestation has nothing to do with sex, nor sexual attractions. Just like rape, it is a crime of control and power over a victim.
When will you grasp this?
A pedophile is an adult who is not attracted to other adults. They are exclusively attracted to children. Most pedophiles have no preference for gender. When there is a preference, they prefer girls to boys 11 to 1.
Still waiting for you to respond with a link to some scientific study proving that only gay men would molest a boy.
Waiting….
Oh I grasp it just fine and do not dispute it. You are trying to bury me in trivia. I completely agree that children that are molested by the opposite sex are heterosexually molested and that the ones molested by the same sex are homo-sexually molested. Both are a crime of control and power. You are asserting that Homosexuals are disproportionately absent from the sample. It is obvious to me that you have dicked with the sample to cherry-pick classifications. Because it makes you look superior. Not buying it, especially from an ideological troll.
I understand your desperate need to attack me personally in an attempt to divert away from the fact that you cannot dispute any of the scientific evidence I’ve posted here which has proven that most men who molest boys are heterosexual. I feel sorry for you, actually. Instead of going on the personal attack, how about posing some scientific evidence which disproves anything I’ve posted here?
You cannot.
Can you?
Dare you.
http://www.thecentersd.org/programs/behavioral-health-services/warning-signs.html
Look at myth numbers 1 and 3.
**************
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/lgbt/news/2011/06/14/9850/domestic-violence-in-the-lgbt-community/
Look where it states that rates are similar: http://www.rohrbaughassociates.net/pdfs/same_sex.pdf
***************
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/a-same-sex-domestic-violence-epidemic-is-silent/281131/
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
You do realize “professor” that 1 in 4 same sex partners are abused in intimate relationships? Exactly equal to your estimate of heterosexual relationships. Coincidence? It’s telling you’re not addressing that.
Shep, I’m sorry I exposed your Boy Scouts of America group as a known group of heterosexual males who prey on young boys. Will you forgive me?
Shall I post more stories about how you heterosexual scout leaders molested boys? I have tons of them. Just ask….
“Like most conservative sites, I fully expect to be kicked off this site.”
Not until you have lost your entertainment value.
The folks here have an inordinate tolerance for the clinically bizarre. If it was my site you’d have been banned long ago for your methods of trolling and ad hominems.
You cling to one “study” about faces that had not been replicated since it was published. Anecdotes don’t count.
Boys in general are masculine. There are no studies to suggest your assertion. Boys will always be boys.
Your cause – effect is junk.
If we reject your self serving definition of Gay, your own post provides the evidence. By a literal definition of male homosexual that does not artificially cull out the sick ones for specious reasons, they are 6 times more likely to molest children in general and 100% more likely to molest boys.
You have stories about homosexuals who lied about their sexuality. Heterosexual men don’t enjoy sex with post adolescent males.
******************
Why do you lie?
Repeatedly citing the same incorrect and discredited material does not support your point.
****************
It only points out how invested you are in your lie. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/22d5506b552a614efff51e9139c1c90d90c4e0e12ef7858d4b4a5961d0d25695.jpg
Just to refresh you, the question was,
*****************
“(Q) Which of the arguments used by the homosexuals to infiltrate the Boy Scouts would not apply equally for the pedophiles?”
******************
You’ve written about 30 replies, and you still haven’t answered the question.
******************
Why is it so important that you lie?
******************
Does it give you a boner to tell lies in support of the homosexual agenda? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9b0a7369a3b519357c5f660c93ad8587a5cec0a01a2096e84d286dccb8e330bb.jpg
Your question makes no sense. I’ll answer it this way:
why would heterosexual males want to be involved in the Boy Scouts?
The answer to your question lies therein.
Try to discredit my material.
++++++++++++++++
Dare you
Your cartoons are stale and silly.
This represents your party well.
…and homosexuals molest at a background rate approximately 30 times greater than the population at large.
No, this is false. First off, 98 percent of molesters are heterosexual males, who represent 48 percent of the population. Most men who molest boys are heterosexual, and 70 percent of victims of molestation are girls. Facts aren’t your strong suit, Shepper.
Don’t let a fact hit you in the face:
98 percent of men who molest boys are in fact heterosexual and not attracted to adult males:
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pd
Maybe I’m Black?
Probably not. You’re too dumb to be black. You’re a white conservative heterosexual male bigot over the age of 65. You wear stretch pants and live on a desolate plot of land in nowheresville
“Most pedophiles have no preference for gender. When there is a preference, they prefer girls to boys 11 to 1.”
You just contradicted yourself and your “science” professor!
Nice work here Paul. You can always be counted on to ignore the smokescreens and to torpedo the actual target.
******************
Forgive me for the GIF. It is so apropo that no reasonable person could resist the desire to post it.
Glad to see you got in on this. I was a bit too busy to deliver the treatment he deserved.
You know he actually claims to be a music perfesser.
It has been a year I think.
And, you can’t scare off a prey that has already been skinned and gutted 🙂 Hat-tip back acha.
I don’t really look for trolls to poke but sometimes you have to brush them back from the plate with a fast-ball high & tight. If that doesn’t work, one in the ear is called for.
Don’t worry. He’s followed me to another site. He’ll keep this up with me until his meds are re-adjusted. It usually takes about 6 weeks.
I so wish I was privvy to this conversation you had with “Guest”. Lol. The fact that he erased every comment of his is revealing. He knows he is a twisted fuсk.
Truth is no obstacle to an unethical person with an agenda.
This guy was a sock of DGCJ (AKA Deeg, DG). Deeg is a notorious defender of pedophiles.
***
DG’s is a music professor at a Catholic University in California.
***
His real world identity is known to many of my brother and sister Disquans.
***
Last year he changed his ID. He had been pretending to be a homosexual politician from Boston named Brian Simms. He even went so far as to use the poor guys press picture as his avatar. He suckered a notorious Third Wave Feminists troll named Expect Resistance (dERp) into believing he was Simms. Part of his hatred of women apparently includes a desire to gain their trust and then to betray them using the most vulgar language imaginable. This pattern has repeated itself many times. In spite of our differences, I tried to warn dERp about his game. She blew me off and he completed his fixed action pattern for abusing heterosexual women.
***
Recently he had changed his avatar pic to a Siamese cat with blue eyes and was using the disqus handle No2Guns. I have screen shots documenting his spirited defense of pedophiles (Strangely enough he only defends homosexual pedophiles). He tired of me confronting him images of his own comments, so he took his profile private.
***
I would also have enjoyed your participation in this conversation.
Here is the conversation that convinced DGCJ to end his Snow (an allegedly straight guy) Cypher ID.
***
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/guyswithiphones/httpguyswithiphonescom201510367441/#comment-2285091758
***
This is the same guy I was talking to here, who was pretending to be a married heterosexual, posting on a gay site about how much he liked some guy’s penis picture.
Thank you for taking the time to fill me in on that back and forth Shep! I thought it was brilliant: witty and concise. I honestly thought you would tire of throttling this twisted reprobate but you stayed at the helm and drowned him in the shallows. If you dig deep enough in my archived comments, you will find me in a similiar conversation with some sick fuck who was defending the prosecution of the 2 US soldiers who beat up an Afghan policeman for raping a young child. He didn’t want to come right out and defend the rape of children but after exhaustive reasoning on my part, I came to the conclusion that he was doing exactly that. I wish you were there for that one. Anyhow, thank you again. I look forward to reading your stuff: you are quite entertaining.
Tommy
I’ll look soon. I’ve got a Boy Scout training to go to this weekend. With a little luck I’ll have enough free time outside of that to look at your history.
***
Thank you for carrying the good fight to the bad guys. There are not enough people like you in the world.
I look forward to kneecapping sniveling apologists for evil with you soon.
Thank you for the kind words Shep. Not that long ago I thought our kind was a dying breed. It feels great to be back in the fight and on the offensive!
Perfect.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/645d7846a99698e14d97c1e769e602c7461d781d46b011e5829d0ca19a50e4b6.png
You should be recognizing that many evangelical youth pastors are the real pedophiles among us, not openly gay boy scout leaders.
You should be recognizing that many homosexual predators are liars.
Looked in a mirror lately, liar?
Are you going to tear up and shed a few crocodile tears for us? Is that part of the gypsy wagon faith-healing show you fake “Christians” like to put on? I would not want any teenage boys wandering loose while you’re out peddling a miracle in my town.
Wow.
**********************
You know, DG “The Liar” CJ has that E X A C T same hatred for “evangelical youth pastors”.
**********************
What a coincidence!
Wow. I didn’t know a hetero could ever write a paragraph like this one.
********************
DG “The Liar” JC, izzat you?
*********************
The writing sure reads as if it is coming from a homosexual perspective.
And many pedos are heterosexual as well
99.9% of the victims of sexual abuse by priests were young boys…the reality is, these priests were gay men…full on faggots, disguised as priests…the Left and Big Gay gave them a pass…because they are one and the same.
Well, by far most pedophiles are heterosexual. There’s probably about the same percentage of pedophiles among homosexuals as heterosexuals. The ones that puzzle me are the normally heterosexual guys (who like adult women) who have a pedophilic attraction to young boys, so they are ostensibly “heterosexual,” but have a fixation for some reason on young people of their same sex.
Homos have a disproportionate number of paedophiles. Naturally the research on this is not repeated often enough.
I stopped supporting gay rights when the Boy Scouts caved into the pressure.
Straight man cant be a girl scout leader even if his daughter is a member- why? Better safe than sorry. Why doesnt “better safe than sorry” apply to boys?
Give an inch, take a mile(or two). happens every time.
That’s exactly correct. Boys should always be in the company of Real men, even if (especially if) a boy believe himself to be gay. Also, it not just straight men who can’t be Girl scout leaders, but any man at all– whether he’s straight, homo, or undecided.
What is “undecided”? I think that was a box i checked when I first registered to vote..
I was trying to be polite to the so-called “bisexuals” even though I know that bisexuality does not actually exist– it’s just a stop on the train to Homo-ville.
Its funny, when I was younger, I remember women, only women, arguing we are all bisexual…
Oops!
There are two types of child molesters: fixated and regressive. The fixated child molester cannot be considered homosexual or heterosexual because “he often finds adults of either sex repulsive” and often molests children of both sexes. Regressive child molesters are generally attracted to other adults, but may “regress” to focusing on children when confronted with stressful situations. Researchers have found no regressed molesters who were exclusively homosexual in their adult relationships.
Child molesters can be divided into two types: “fixated” and
“regressed.” The fixated offender is attracted primarily to children and has
little or no interest in adult relationships; such a person is known in clinical
terms as a “pedophile.” The regressed offender is interested in and capable of
adult sexual relationships; however, this person may on occasion regress to
sexual encounters with children, often as a result of difficulties and
frustration in his adult relationships
In general, fixated child molesters are drawn to children sexually in that they
identify with the child and appear in some ways to want to remain children
themselves. It is for this reason that the trend for fixated offenders is to
target boys as victims. . . . They see the boy as a projected representation of
themselves. They feel themselves to be more child than adult and therefore find
themselves more comfortable (especially sexually) in the company of children.
The second type of offender, the regressed offender, is predominantly
heterosexual. However, he may temporarily turn to boys or girls as a result of
complications in his adult relations. Although regressed offenders are more
likely to choose girls than boys as victims what attracts the regressed male
offender to boys are the feminine characteristics of pre‑ pubescents.
Researchers found no cases of boy molestation in which the offender had an
adult homosexual orientation.
These same individuals are uninterested in adult homosexual
relationships. In fact, they frequently express a strong sexual aversion to
adult males, reporting that what they find attractive about the immature boy
are his feminine features and the absence of secondary sexual characteristics
such as body hair and muscles.”
The majority of perpetrators of sexual violence are men. Studies of sexual assault against children and young adolescents report that more than 97% of perpetrators were male. Despite popular belief, most male perpetrators identify themselves as heterosexual and often have consensual sexual relationships with women. One study notes that 98% of male perpetrators self-identify as heterosexual. Source: Male Survivors of Sexual Violence, state of Michigan
Bisexuality absolutely exists and has been confirmed as a distinct sexual orientation by University of Chicago in an extensive study.
Women really can’t do much sexually. They are limited by their anatomy. Two men have two sticks and two holes. Two females have four holes. What can you do with that? Women aren’t attracted to body parts the way we men are. I happen to prefer penis over hole. No offense….
“…identify themselves…” = “…lie about their homosexuality…”
*******************
Why do you lie? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a84b33936bd8a241f74c7fefbf82be24777a09111e7e4cf9e7df8bd4d96e1b64.gif
“Researchers have found no regressed molesters who were exclusively homosexual in their adult relationships.”
****************
Source please.
So a fixated child molester who focuses on boys cannot be considered a homosexual.
********************
How fucking convenient.
********************
Why do you lie? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/580361df59db2f052933bb50c176a490ff9ebf1f91ac073b9e7f02311c866e41.jpg
No, research shows that there have been no cases of a fixated molester who were homosexual.
Reading isn’t your strong suit, is it?
Stick to something you’re good at, Shep: Molesting children.
I provided it the first time, Shepper.
Nope, it is illogical that a gay man would be attracted to a boy. Why?
Boys exhibit these feminine characteristics:
Smooth soft skin
No facial hair
No body hair
High pitched feminine voices
A penis incapable of an erection
Why would any gay man be attracted to someone who looks like a woman? It is illogical. The show To Catch a Predator has had many men caught who were married to women and looking for boys for sex. The show uses actual women’s voices to lure men into thinking they are meeting up with a boy. Watch it, and tell me I’m wrong.
Poor Shep, lost again:
Heterosexual men are more likely to molest boys than homosexual men, and
here’s why:
Child molestation and child abuse refer to “actions” without implying any
particular psychological makeup or motive. In other words, not all incidents
of
child abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles. Rather a
pedophile doesn’t experience
sexual desire for adults of either gender. They
usually don’t identify as
homosexual-the majority identify as heterosexual,
even those who abuse children
of the same gender. They are sexually aroused
by youth, not by gender. In contrast, child molesters often exert power and
control over children in an
effort to dominate them. They do experience
sexual desire for adults, but
molest children episodically, for reasons
apart from sexual desire, much as a
rapist enjoys power, violence and
controlling their humiliated victims. For
pedophiles the gender of the child
is immaterial. Accessibility is more the
factor in who a pedophile abuses.
Males often are given easier access to male
children. In trying to make
sense of an adult male’s sexually abusing a male child, many of us mislabel it
as an act of homosexuality, which it isn’t. To call child
molestation of a
boy by a man “homosexual” or of a girl by a man “heterosexual”
is to
misunderstand pedophilia. No true pedophile is attracted to adults, so
neither homosexuality nor heterosexuality applies. When men molest little
girls we call him a “pedophile” not a heterosexual. Of course, when a man
molests little boys people say outright he is a “homosexual.” It is because of
our society’s aversion to homosexuality,but it is wrong. In reality, abuse of
boys by gay pedophiles is extremely rare, and the abuse of girls by lesbians
rarer still.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-kort-phd/homosexuality-and-pedophi_b_1932622.html
Source: Homosexuality and Pedophilia, a false
link
Shep, post something that debunks that statement.
I’ll wait….
Quick reminder about the “activities” of the group YOU belong to:
I’ve always known that the Boys Scouts was a haven for heterosexual men who
molest boys. Who needs NAMBLA when you can join the Boy Scouts of America and
go on “camping” trips with boys?
http://www.wcvb.com/news/rabbi-boy-scout-leader-among-70-arrested-in-new-york-porn-case/26093070
http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2014/06/former_teacher_boy_scout_leade.html
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2014/06/13/former-phoenix-boy-scout-leader-arrested-abrk/10460051/
http://www.nbc29.com/story/20208948/former-boy-scout-troop-leader-arrested-on-forcible-sodomy-charge
http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/crime-law/cub-scout-troop-leader-arrested-sex-crime-charges/nfRhR/
http://www.lex18.com/news/former-boy-scout-speaks-out-about-twins-arrested-for-child-porn/
http://www.wdsu.com/news/local-news/new-orleans/sheriff-former-boy-scout-leader-teacher-accused-of-child-porn-sexual-battery-rape-involving-children/26696954
And the irony is that homosexuals have never been allowed to serve as
leaders in the Boy Scouts, and 100 percent of these molesters were heterosexual
males. One story involves a heterosexual man and his girlfriend who molested
boys together! Oh the depravity!
Reposting links which didn’t support your assertions the first time, doesn’t make them true.
*******************
You are not even a skilled liar.
*******************
Why do you lie?
It is called logic.
****************
I’m not surprised you didn’t catch it. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1dd10867e0be565cff5300dc1faf46d9c135437cf659ed1706912c678b97f768.jpg
It is not a “pedophile” when the boy is post adolescent.
*****************
That is called homosexuality.
*****************
Why do you lie?
On opinion piece in the Huffington Post is hardly a legitimate source.
***************
You have a long history of using illegitimate sources.
***************
Why do you lie?
So if a 40 year old leader has sex with a 15 year old post adolescent boy, and that is the age of consent for that jurisidiction, that is pedophilia?
******************
Listen to yourself.
******************
Try to learn why you lie. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7aa238fb61e95415df3c46b762be44b30b8f8295cb24ff0bac8de0c192fb8276.jpg
Pedophilia is an attraction to prepubescent children, dummy. What does a 15 year old boy have to do with pedophilia? That’s the legal age of consent in most countries, and girls can marry at that age in most states, with parental consent.
Educate yourself, moron.
That piece was written by a respected scholar in this field.
I realize education scares conservatives. Not my issue.
Yes, when a boy is 15 it is no longer pedophilia, moron. That’s why Harvey Milk is not a pedophile, as you conservative idiots claim. In fact, every town has heterosexual males who’ve had sex with teens that were the same age as Harvey Milk’s partners.
Moron.
Retard alert. Posting comic strip images is your excuse for research?
Lord help us all.
My links absolutely supported my assertions:
The Boy Scouts have traditionally been infested by heterosexual males who prey on young boys sexually.
That’s a fact, Shep.
1.) Those all sound like twink characteristics to me.
2.) Who do twinks shave their bodies to impress? Heterosexual men?
3.) Even babies are capable of erections. Where did you get the idea that they weren’t?
Source please.
1 you don’t know what a twink is.
2 twinks don’t shave their body. No gay man would shave their body. That would be a crime against masculinity
3 no boys do not have erections. You sound like you’ve had experience with this, which is truly creepy
I provided it. Dumbass.
It broke my heart. I we considered going to Trail Life USA, but our boys wanted to Eagle.
Hi Shep – the weekend camping was a success and our Boy Scout is ecstatic because the troop also had the required handling of knives training. He is supposed to receive his certificate tonight at the weekly meeting. If so, I’m getting him this one for starters:
http://www.swissknifeshop.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/S/A/SACAMPER.jpg
I carry this one:
http://www.swissknifeshop.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/a/sa23913scx1000.jpg
Don’t tell DG Jazzy Jeff about Trail Life!! He’ll be wanting the kids to tickle his ivories!!
Wouldn’t that one be an “ebony”?
Given how goofy he is today, I wondered if the syphillis was getting him down. Necrosis, maybe?
Many boys see that Totin’ Chip as their first foray into the responsibilities of manhood.
******************
In our unit, it someone does something stupid with a knife, we cut a corner off in front of the entire unit. Once four corners are off, they have to re-certify, usually at the hands of the PL or SPL. Lots of derision is involved. The kid usually gets the message at that point. Same story for Fireman and Paul Bunyan chips.
*******************
When I was in the second grade we could bring our pocket knives to school if we had the Cub Scout equivalent. The teachers would check.
******************
When in the field, I carry the knife you are giving your son.
******************
Any boy would be lucky to have a Dad like you. I know you will be a strong influence on the other boys who don’t have good men in their lives.
Be sure to tell your boy that the proper way to pronounce that company is Vic-trin-ox. You want him to make the right impression on any old timers who might be watching. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/027eb194a8e2eba8579df212c7d979f20ab254cca1b5de71b96a8268178a9728.jpg
How many boys have you molested, Shep? Be honest
You were disappointed that you would lose your right to molest boys, Shep?
I’ve always known that the Boys Scouts was a haven for heterosexual men who molest boys. Who needs NAMBLA when you can join the Boy Scouts of America and go on “camping” trips with boys?
http://www.wcvb.com/news/rabbi-boy-scout-leader-among-70-arrested-in-new-york-porn-case/26093070
http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2014/06/former_teacher_boy_scout_leade.html
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2014/06/13/former-phoenix-boy-scout-leader-arrested-abrk/10460051/
http://www.nbc29.com/story/20208948/former-boy-scout-troop-leader-arrested-on-forcible-sodomy-charge
http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/crime-law/cub-scout-troop-leader-arrested-sex-crime-charges/nfRhR/
http://www.lex18.com/news/former-boy-scout-speaks-out-about-twins-arrested-for-child-porn/
http://www.wdsu.com/news/local-news/new-orleans/sheriff-former-boy-scout-leader-teacher-accused-of-child-porn-sexual-battery-rape-involving-children/26696954
And the irony is that homosexuals have never been allowed to serve as leaders in the Boy Scouts, and 100 percent of these molesters were heterosexual males. One story involves a heterosexual man and his girlfriend who molested boys together! Oh the depravity!
Shep, your first paragraphs sounds like something a pedophile would write. How fascinating!
Especially in light of these facts:
I’ve always known that the Boys Scouts was a haven for heterosexual men who molest boys. Who needs NAMBLA when you can join the Boy Scouts of America and go on “camping” trips with boys?
http://www.wcvb.com/news/rabbi-boy-scout-leader-among-70-arrested-in-new-york-porn-case/26093070
http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2014/06/former_teacher_boy_scout_leade.html
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2014/06/13/former-phoenix-boy-scout-leader-arrested-abrk/10460051/
http://www.nbc29.com/story/20208948/former-boy-scout-troop-leader-arrested-on-forcible-sodomy-charge
http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/crime-law/cub-scout-troop-leader-arrested-sex-crime-charges/nfRhR/
http://www.lex18.com/news/former-boy-scout-speaks-out-about-twins-arrested-for-child-porn/
http://www.wdsu.com/news/local-news/new-orleans/sheriff-former-boy-scout-leader-teacher-accused-of-child-porn-sexual-battery-rape-involving-children/26696954
And the irony is that homosexuals have never been allowed to serve as leaders in the Boy Scouts, and 100 percent of these molesters were heterosexual males. One story involves a heterosexual man and his girlfriend who molested boys together! Oh the depravity!
Look how I was able to educate the heterosexual morons on this page!! Thanks for leading me here. What a gold mine! I stumbled into a group of heterosexual men who molest boys, the FBI has been alerted
Still sourcing stories that don’t actually support your lies? I thought we had broken you of that.
********************
You were using these same stories a year ago. You were lying about their content then, as you are now.
*********************
Why do you lie?
Your sources do not support your premise.
********************
Why do you lie?
How many have you? Do you advocate Milk’s lifestyle of taking advantage of at-risk, runaway, drug-addicted often heterosexual youth?
Yawn.
******************
Two years later, and still at it. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5a667b6d0134df09fcae53129f4680ab8020b6067e3b7fa4de84b9c6620ae61b.jpg
But first, you’ll need to explain to the special agents why your obsession with a Pennsylvania state representative who shall remain nameless has led you to steal his identity for years, “Brian.”
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9c9ee823165df0a5955245a23097a3315d31d85e17e0b595aff5a34bd219f98c.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ead698d1cdb7433f06d98ebf896fc1bdbdd3175d18fe6f5de01294ff530cdef3.jpg careful the princess is in a gang.
I’m from the old school Shep but in today’s environment knives only on camping/hiking trips and at home. Nothing like that ever to school. In the Windy City you can’t even bring whiteout to class.
When I was a kid we played this game:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knife_game
omg.. did you do the blood brothers thing too? I remember that one.
Much fun it was!
First you need I explain why Obama has let so many conservative bigots steal his picture and pretend to be him on the internet
Well aren’t you a child molester who denies it….
That’s not Obama, you git. Say my name…
Thanks for proving my point, Batsin D. Belfry…
Poor Shep, still in denial about his molestation.
I’m not attracted to boys. I’m a homosexual.
Harvey Milk didn’t have sex with prepubescent boys. In fact, he had sex with boys that are of the same age that girls can legally marry in most states.
Stop spreading lies. Harvey Milk was no molester of children.
My source does support my premise:
Perpetrators of Sexual Assault
The majority of perpetrators of sexual violence are
men. Studies of sexual assault against children and
young adolescents report that more than 97% of perpetrators were male. Despite popular belief, most
male perpetrators identify themselves as heterosexual and often have consensual sexual relationships with women. One study notes that 98% of male perpetrators self-identify as heterosexual
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pdf
The FBI did a sting on NAMBLA. Much to their surprise, the majority of the men in NAMBLA are heterosexual and married to women. They expressed disgust at adult male homosexuality. One of them went onto Oprah and said that the thought of having sex with a man was disgusting, but he was attracted to women and little boys. His name is Todd Calvin. Google him.
I posted multiple times my sources, Shep. I noticed you have been unable or unwilling to post anything to debunk me. I win. You lose. Simple…
This story is about heterosexual men who molest boys in Afghanistan. It’s an ancient practice that continues to this day:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/dancingboys/
Post something that debunks my posts, and I’ll respect you more. Your ridiculous style of writing has been ridiculed before, and yet you continue it. Bad student….
Funny how all you conservative morons can do is post cartoons. Meanwhile, I’m here to educate you. You didn’t previously know that 98 percent of men who molest boys are heterosexual. Now you know:
Heterosexual men are more likely to molest boys than homosexual men, and
here’s why:
Child molestation and child abuse refer to “actions” without implying any particular psychological makeup or motive. In other words, not all incidents
of
child abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles. Rather a
pedophile doesn’t experience
sexual desire for adults of either gender. They
usually don’t identify as
homosexual-the majority identify as heterosexual,
even those who abuse children
of the same gender. They are sexually aroused
by youth, not by gender. In contrast, child molesters often exert power and
control over children in an
effort to dominate them. They do experience
sexual desire for adults, but
molest children episodically, for reasons
apart from sexual desire, much as a
rapist enjoys power, violence and
controlling their humiliated victims. For
pedophiles the gender of the child
is immaterial. Accessibility is more the
factor in who a pedophile abuses.
Males often are given easier access to male
children. In trying to make
sense of an adult male’s sexually abusing a male child, many of us mislabel it
as an act of homosexuality, which it isn’t. To call child
molestation of a
boy by a man “homosexual” or of a girl by a man “heterosexual”
is to
misunderstand pedophilia. No true pedophile is attracted to adults, so
neither homosexuality nor heterosexuality applies. When men molest little
girls we call him a “pedophile” not a heterosexual. Of course, when a man
molests little boys people say outright he is a “homosexual.” It is because of
our society’s aversion to homosexuality,but it is wrong. In reality, abuse of
boys by gay pedophiles is extremely rare, and the abuse of girls by lesbians
rarer still.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-kort-phd/homosexuality-and-pedophi_b_1932622.html
Source: Homosexuality and Pedophilia, a false
link
Still waiting for you to provide any source which actually supports your ridiculous statement.
…and it supports my assertion that sexuality is fluid, not fixed as you homofascist have maintained in order to advance your political agenda. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ec0dc1abb16ebee972a345c2187992f366e2e7efe244108101037e5d64015397.jpg
If you like sticking your penis into another individual of the same sex, you are not heterosexual.
*****************
How hard is that for you to understand? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f26eb4bb0c02bb09840cde904d5010ff807e2019c3914666817bf2557129951e.jpg
You’re so mature, eyes roll.
No, if a man sticks his penis into a boy, he is usually heterosexual. This has been proven by me. Prove otherwise, moron.
Hey! I remember a couple of years ago when you cited this document as a US government study!
*********************
You misrepresented the findings then too!
*********************
I would think you would have found some new material to lie about by now. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ed266dcba21dc395c0fa4210549a4421f0c774217230d9a60d101b1660f27495.jpg
*********************
Anything for the cause, right?
That supports no such assertion. It supports the notion that most men who molest boys a heterosexual and not attracted to men.
I provided that multiple times.
So if Harvey was banging 15 year old boys on a camp out in CA, you would be fine with that.
****************
You are one sick fuck.
****************
…and a habitual liar. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c0b1a26418dac79d48f44b9835c5f281bd7a2fb3933e71d6e9f5ec8719236d3d.jpg
Seems pretty simple to me.
Quote and then provide the link.
*******************
You can’t because your links don’t support your assertion.
I will, retard. How slow are you?
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pdf
Perpetrators of Sexual Assault
The majority of perpetrators of sexual violence are
men. Studies of sexual assault against children and
young adolescents report that more than 97% of perpetrators were male. Despite popular belief, most
male perpetrators identify themselves as heterosexual and often have consensual sexual relationships with women. One study notes that 98% of male perpetrators self-identify as heterosexual
In cultures where a sex act is acceptable, more people will engage in that act.
*****************
Open your fuckin’ eyes.
15 is the age of consent in many countries and states. If the boys did it voluntarily, absolutely. The boys that you Scouts have sex with don’t do it voluntarily. They are forced to do it.
So how many boys have you stuck your penis in while you were proving this?
Can we force people who oppose guns on moral grounds to provide a gun license?
Same source, same validity. It’s still posted on their site:
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pdf
You post links, not sources. One day you’ll learn the difference. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/77dac9018e3199094119d12038a1cd19749c4303eb39db953bd98f2d1f6c05dd.jpg
Since nobody has yet been able to prove in a court of law that baking a cake is a religious act or ritual, nobody has been able to demonstrate that baking a cake for gays violates any religious beliefs.
Therefore, you have nothing.
Keep whining, it’s entertaining.
Ooops, these men are heterosexual and they stick their penis into a boy who is dressed as a woman, and dances for them provocatively:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_bazi
How many boys did you molest on your “camping” trip?
Be honest.
Cartoons in place of scientific evidence.
Classic conservativism, folks.
You wonder why you lost the culture war? Now you know.
Not interested in boys. I’m a homosexual male. I’m attracted to men.
Yes, and that’s why the Boy Scouts have been traditionally a haven for heterosexual men who have sex with boys. Such pederasty is ubiquitous and well documented since Ancient Greece.
My links support my assertion and debunk your nonsense. Most men who molest boys are heterosexual.
Does selling a gun to a murderer mean you’ve participated in the murder?
I knew you were a fake. I’ll bet you are one of those effeminate homosexuals desperate for attention from heterosexual men. No such luck here.
Nope, not interested in your affection and not effeminate. In fact, I’m on the way to the gym, while you talk about camping trips with boys.
Who’s the sicko here? Not me
The idea of going on camping trips with boys absolutely turns my stomach.
You’re a sick person.
You do realize that the Boy Scouts is a known haven for heterosexual men who prey on young boys, correct?
I bet you and Jerry Sandusky are best chums.
“Straight man cant be a girl scout leader even if his daughter is a member”
Is this true? For real? If so its a case for Fathers Rights Activists.
Oops, you seem ignorant of the fact that 98 percent of men who molest boys are heterosexual and usually married to women. Boy Scouts are safer with gay leaders than straight leaders. Less molestation….
Still you lie.
*****************
This was discredited a year ago, and you never stopped posting it.
Nope, not discredited at all, and it is still on their website:
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/datingviolence/DHS-DatingViolence-MaleSurvivors_198439_7.pdf
The majority of perpetrators of sexual violence are men. Studies of sexual assault against children and young adolescents report that more than 97% of perpetrators were male. Despite popular belief, most male perpetrators identify themselves as heterosexual and often have consensual sexual relationships with women. One study notes that 98% of male perpetrators self-identify as heterosexual.
You and Jerry Sandusky have a lot in common, Shep.
Remember when you pretended the NGO portion of this was an official US Government documen?
*******************
Why do you lie?
What’s a documen?
There are two types of child molesters: fixated and regressive. The fixated child molester cannot be considered homosexual or heterosexual because “he often finds adults of either sex repulsive” and often molests children of both sexes. Regressive child molesters are generally attracted to other adults, but may “regress” to focusing on children when confronted with stressful situations. Researchers have found no regressed molesters who were exclusively homosexual in their adult relationships.
Cut–>paste–>lie.
****************
You could at least change your talking points every couple of years or so.
Look at the edit on my post. It supplies a link that you should look at.
Hi Sarge. I am not quite sure I see how to apply that link.
Just open and read, It will give you insight to the thinkings of your troll.
This troll: https://disqus.com/home/discussion/returnofkings/5_people_that_national_review_hates_more_than_admitted_pedophile_todd_nickerson/#comment-2280126634
Cut and paste equals facts.
I noticed you posted nothing to contradict my facts. Why is that, Shepper?
Cut and paste, in your case, equals links to unrelated stories.
******************
Your hope is that no one will actually follow your links.
My story is quite related. Do you want those dozens of stories about heterosexual Scout masters who molested boys?
I’ll provide them, if asked.
Thanks Sarge!
***************
Many of us have had dealing with this one before.
***************
His hatred of women gives new meaning to the word “profane”.
I’ve always known that the Boys Scouts was a haven for heterosexual men who molest boys. Who needs NAMBLA when you can join the Boy Scouts of America and go on “camping” trips with boys?
http://www.wcvb.com/news/rabbi-boy-scout-leader-among-70-arrested-in-new-york-porn-case/26093070
http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2014/06/former_teacher_boy_scout_leade.html
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2014/06/13/former-phoenix-boy-scout-leader-arrested-abrk/10460051/
http://www.nbc29.com/story/20208948/former-boy-scout-troop-leader-arrested-on-forcible-sodomy-charge
http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/crime-law/cub-scout-troop-leader-arrested-sex-crime-charges/nfRhR/
http://www.lex18.com/news/former-boy-scout-speaks-out-about-twins-arrested-for-child-porn/
http://www.wdsu.com/news/local-news/new-orleans/sheriff-former-boy-scout-leader-teacher-accused-of-child-porn-sexual-battery-rape-involving-children/26696954
And the irony is that homosexuals have never been allowed to serve as leaders in the Boy Scouts, and 100 percent of these molesters were heterosexual males. One story involves a heterosexual man and his girlfriend who molested boys together! Oh the depravity!
Your question itself is the perversion. Openly serving and observing the standards of Boy Scouts as a leader is NOT an invasion or “infiltration,” as you would label their very up front and honest efforts. You are an idiot. My family has a good half century of scout leadership spread around the guys among us. We have all known closeted gay scout leaders who upheld all of the standards of scouting. The gay scout leaders were already there because they grew up in scouting as gay youth and then gay scout leaders. BSA is simply letting them serve openly and without shame. The pedophiles in scouting almost always turn out to be youth pastors from this church or that one, not gay scouts who went on to become gay scout leaders. Evangelical youth pastors produce more convicted pedophiles than any other institutional group. You know it’s true.
How could you write so much and say absolutely nothing?
Good question. And one you should really answer for yourself, blatherskite.
Funny. It seems like just last month you were claiming it was the Catholics.
*******************
Why do you lie?
Funny how that is not even close to being true. Nuts like you do love to invent “facts” from where the sun doesn’t shine, don’t you?
Source please for your lie about pedophiles in the BSA almost always being youth pastors.
******************
Why do you lie? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
More lame attempts to keep you lame arguments going?
Source please. If you cannot produce one, consider your lie refuted.
************************
DGJC, why do you lie?
Source please. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ff0392594d1b2bb87d50bcf07378eaf0af2e842232343db8a1515cdc1284610.jpg
Mind == blown.
That tells me you have an open mind and do not, as a matter of course, integrate propaganda into your thinking.
******************
You have a discriminating mind, and that is a compliment. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/41ab4fcf821e15cf3410cd0090b25890fcd49ab5f29f3ce82c128e1452858a59.jpg
Fun read, Matt. Well done.
Well written. The alt-right is going to continue to grow, because we’re saying the things people want to hear. And we have enough people that want to hear to be profitable and stay in business.
It will grow.
Or..
the “in your face we are going to homo/trans your kids while letting in hordes of illegals to outvote you and there’s nothing you can do about it” will simply result in heads getting bashed in the street, brown uniforms, etc.
And I won’t be doing a damned thing to stop it. After all, as I’m told, I’m all wrong when I speak out against the current bullshit. So I guess I’ll have to take a backseat to the reaction to the current bullshit and wave at the illegals as they get forcibly deported, and wave at the leftoids as they get rounded the fuck up.
Oops, sexual orientation isn’t formed that way and no gay person believes you can make another person gay. It doesn’t work like that. That won’t prevent heterosexual morons from trying to make gays ex-gay. And I’ve been hit on by more women than most straight men and it’s usually after they find out I’m gay. They’re weird that way. They don’t care if you sleep with many men, but want to be the only woman you sleep with. Messed up….
Really? Ann Coulter? Isn’t this the kind of strong independent nagging woman ROK whines about? A real conservative woman should stay in the house. Also, let’s combat pedophilia by first purging it out of your beloved religious institutions.
That doesn’t change the fact that Coulter tells it like it is and raises a lot of facts and issues others are not willing to address.
Doesn’t mean we have to marry her.
We don’t have to. And frankly, who would marry her? Any man who does is liable to commit suicide.
I’d throw a few in her.
I suppose I would too. I would keep bear mace handy just in case. As for Nancy Grace, I would hit that, in the face, with a hammer, until it fucking DIES!!
She chose a career over having children and has stuck with it. At least she’s consistent and not trying to “Have It All!(tm)”. And many times she makes some pretty solid points that others are afraid to say in public. Not always, sometimes she really pops off a doozy that makes one cringe, but otherwise, she’s fairly solid on a fair amount of issues.
Yep.
I think in the sphere generally we are not trying to get women to marry young and have kids, or trying to tell them how to live.
All we want, I think, is for women to accept the consequences of their choices in life. Want to be the party girl while young and suck cock by the bag? Fine. Just remember that when you won’t give a man your best years, no man is obligated to be there for you for your worst.
I’m in the same boat. I am not opposed per se to women having equal rights. They just haven’t really adjusted well to that freedom. They seem to equate freedom of choice with I do whatever the fuck I want and you can’t tell me what to do.
I’ll give you that point. She’s still despicable, but at least she’s consistent.
I attended a left coast law school with a hundred screaming harpies who I would never date. And the competent lawyers I ran into after graduation tended (but not exclusively) to be masculine in various ways. They made great second tier friends because they were reliable but you could not discuss a lot of “guy shit” with them.
Yea Ann Coulter is a shrill and annoying cunt. shes a prototype cat lady if I’ve ever seen one.
There is no bigger cuckservative mangina faggot than Rich Lowry. He really is a scumbag.
Salon writes, accept pedophilia, etc etc..
Awake man says, allright, see, pedophilia is rampant (and even accepted by some) in countries of the religion of peace.
Salon goes Wow just wow, you’re such a raciss…
Forgetting that 1. they just endorsed their own child bugger, 2. religion is not race, 3. whatever the awakened man said is true.
The true colors are flying, let them fly a little more, so that the unawakened men with children and daughters are forced to open their eyes, not all, but most, will.
Great article Matt. I’d like to further reiterate if you are a fag, transgender freakazoid, or a pedophile, you’re abnormal. No ifs ands or buts about it. You just are. It amazes me these so called “people” are revered in the West which is all the more reason our civilization is heading for the toilet. Or maybe it’s already in the toilet and I haven’t noticed. I like the Derb, Steyn, and Coulter–particularly Coulter. Any woman who says women should not have the right to vote is okay in my book. Besides, who cares what National Review thinks anyway? They’re only good for lining bird cages.
Oops, being gay is quite normal. Minority status doesn’t equate with abnormal, stupid moron.
Of course we gay people are admited and for good reason. We are at the very top regarding education and income. You wouldn’t have a computer without the gay man who created computer science. Gay men have superior cognitive functions, soatial memory and verbal skills. Gay men have larger brains and we’re generally better looking and in better physical shape. That’s why women hit on us all the time.
Basically it’s a “racism is worse than pedophilia if you’re white” argument. Dismissible, though it continues to shock me how many people pretty much fall for it.
Hey Matt – I think you meant to state “Five People That Mr Cooke HATES More Than Admitted Pedophile Todd Nickerson.” 😉
IMO this endorsement of Salon’s disgusting defense of child predators is solely owned by Cooke. No self – respecting conservative and a decent human would ever praise this garbage penned by Cooke.
If NR published it and continue to employ the guy, NR can be painted as supporting it.
National Review has been a joke for years.
Now would be the perfect time to counter with a “I’m a straight white male, but not a monster” article on Salon.
T H A T
W O U L D
B E
E P I C !
Epic
I would suggest ”I’m a racist sexist shitlord, but not a monster”
The attacks on National Review’s purges are excellent (and what about Joe Sobran?) but what point is being made about pedophiles, exactly? That Christian doctrine states Christians should NOT love child molesters? Did this:
“Given how absurd and suicidal it is for a “right-wing” publication to defend child molestation”
really happen? The National Review defends child molestation? Really?
Or is this sort of like… oh, I don’t know, certain Canadians saying Roosh wants to legalize rape?
Great article Matt…
I created a term that drives SJWs shitcrazy. . .well, moreso than normal: “biologically dysfunctional”. Basically, if you feel compelled to do things that have no possibility of furthering the human race, you are biologically dysfunctional. Anyone who exclusively pursues sex with the same sex or kids too young to breed meet that definition.
.
The obvious wiggle room is lost on them because they are so incensed that you do no accept the normalization of the behavior. Alternatively, they miss the point by citing heterosexuals who have oral sex. . .IDIOTS.
I’ll have to try that sometime.
And…term officially snagged.
I’m glad than more than just the people on this forum are starting to notice the homosexuality of america, people on my fb and in every day life have started to make statements about it. It’s also best to reassure these people because i notice if you dont say anything they will just apologize and go back to being a sheep. Hell I can’t even watch TV now without some lesbian or gay undertown themed sit com coming on now.
You’re absolutely correct, homosexuals should get back in the closet and stay there, and they should take their gay-themed T.V. shows with them.
The fun part of reading National Review Online is the comments. Just like there is a broadening gulf between the Republican establishment and Conservative voters – there is a pretty broad gulf between NRO writers and readers.
The authors are regularly skewered in the comments. The exception is Kevin Williamson.
If you stray too far from NRO orthodoxy in your comments, you’ll be banned as a”troll”, sure as sunup.
Williamson is getting it with both barrels these day over his Trump hysterics. I like his writing, he’s talented, but he’s the one that wrote “Witless ape rides escalator” about Trump. Williamson used to post on the Corner more, and interact more, but his presence there is noticeably reduced. All the writers there talk of how disappointed they are in the rank and file these days, and I’m sure Williamson is one of them.
Let’s start with fags: cocksuckers, fudgepackers or whatever. Fill your boots, but don’t get the gay gestapo to impose the normality of your ideas on others and force cities to give money to gay pride parades and get this shit into our public school curriculums. I hate to say it, but some of my best friends have been gay (and the fucker stabbed me in the back on a business deal, but don’t take that “backstabbing” too far).
.
Pedos I have absolutely no time for. There is what I think the technical term is “non-paraphilic ephebiphilia” which basically means that you think teenage girls are rather fuckable but they aren’t the only ones you would spear, given the chance. In other circles, that is called “being normal” although there are still certain social taboos about age.
.
This whole age thing gets old (pun intended) as I have so many comments about my personal experiences that are relevant but I don’t really want to hash through again.
The Brit guy with the scarf is such a hipster affectation. That guy is always on Bill Maher’s show as the “house cuckservative” which should tell you something…
I didn’t check out the author of the article, but by the 4th paragraph I knew it was you Mr. Forney. Your political commentary is amazing, and I hold you as a high standard on ethics in journalism. Keep ’em coming.
If Forney’s familiarity with NR is anything more than cursory you wouldn’t know it from this article. This could have just as easily been written by a student in SJW Journal-activism 101: Grab a few unrelated facts, then string them together and use them to indict the targeted group as a whole. Are all ROK fans on par with the alt-right slobs who berate David French for being a “cuck” who “betrayed his race” by adopting a kid from Africa?
As is the case with ROK, NR writers often disagree with each other and publish articles from various sides of a given position. Without even opening Google, I already know how revered Coulter is by many at NR; I know they’ve published articles in defense of Sterling’s invasion of privacy and others critical of the BS SJW lynch mob that followed; I know Steyn’s departure from NR was lamented by fellow writers – and also had a lot to do with his choice to pursue different legal representation in Mann’s suit where they are both defendants.
You are correct in describing NR’s round criticism of Trump, but keep in mind this “businessman” has a career replete with major failings including having a casino go under (????), is about as knowledgeable in world affairs as a Huffington Post reader, is very obviously making shit up as he goes along, was a bonafide liberal for about as much of his life as Hillary and Obama were against gay marriage, and was only rich in the first place because he got to play with daddy’s mountain of money. Sure, he gets a surge in broad polls from people who enjoy hearing someone speak without a PC filter, even if what is being said is incoherent. Trump is a rodeo clown who simply has zero chance of winning. Support for him is support for whoever the Dem nominee is. Didn’t you write here telling us all not to vote anyway?
And for God’s sake Forney, NR is “rolling over to the left on every issue save for Israel and corporate tax cuts”??? What about articles on the cult of global warming? The nonsense of black lives matter? Occupy Wall St? The truth about Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, and other sanctified criminals? The power vacuum that US action in the MIddle East has drilled, paving the road for the savages now running the joint? All the transgender bullshit? The cost of illegal immigration? The welfare state? Free speech? …and probably 1,000 others that practically mirror the sentiment expressed by ROK writers in general and by you specifically? Did you miss those?
Return of Kings could do well with a little more National Review and a little less Salon.
Another homecon whining about how people aren’t conservative enough? Must be a Matt Forney article.
Much of what we are seeing was described by Ayn Rand in an article titled “Conservatism: An Obituary”. Her critique is spot on and it was written over 50 years ago. I’m beginning to learn that the American conservative establishment cannot, in any way, shape, or form, lay claim to Reagan and Coolidge. The American conservative establishment is easily led by the nose by the progressives and liberals. These idiots continue to use Arthur Schlesinger’s rubric by which to rate presidents. That speaks volumes.
for Matt Forney, Ayn Rand is a “Zionist whore”. sorry…