Orally Raping A Man Won’t Get You Indicted In America

Texas, supposedly America’s most patriarchal state, doesn’t believe a woman should be indicted for orally raping a man while he was asleep. She is now a free woman after a grand jury “no billed” the case. Prosecutors had no choice but to dismiss the already weak (relative to the allegations) charges against her.

Megan Rae Davis, who additionally goes by Megan Hoelting and presumably “Walking Pussy Pass,” admitted that she broke into the home of her husband’s friend in the middle of night and wrapped her legs around him in bed. The alleged victim went further, asserting that he felt his penis being put in Davis’ mouth. Considering that Davis gripped her legs around the man, clearly a sexual act, Davis sexually assaulted him from the outset, even if we gave her the benefit of the doubt over the oral rape (which I won’t be doing). When the man came to, he found Davis astride him, only “dressed” in her panties.

Although The Huffington Post carried the original story of Davis’ arrest in October 2014, the situation has been largely or completely ignored by the bigger outlets, especially when the case was thrown out recently. After the feminist and mainstream media outrage which accompanied the thirty day sentence for (male) teacher rapist Stacey Rambold, he was re-sentenced to fifteen years, including five suspended.

It beggars belief, despite the admittedly very serious nature of Rambold’s crime, that Davis’ free ride in the justice system should be incongruently kept out of the major media spotlight. A victim is a victim. Unless you’re a man, I suppose.

But when a man is accused?

megan-davis-hoelting

Beneath every self-entitled new bride like Megan Rae Davis lies a meth addict-looking woman waiting to jump out from all the make-up.

Men are regularly tried and convicted with no evidence other than the testimony of the woman alleging rape or sexual assault. Many times both parties are agreed that the defendant or pre-trial accused was not trespassing when the alleged crime took place. Contrasting this, Megan Rae Davis has admitted that she illegally forced her way into the home of the man.

By itself, this is more concrete evidence or overall context than the majority of sexual assault cases leveled against male accused, yet Davis still gets her pussy pass. A girl’s gotta do what a girl’s gotta do, right? I guess that now includes sexually assaulting your husband’s friend when you get the “sexual munchies.”

Davis is also a living embodiment of criminal dysfunction. In the same month she sexually assaulted the man, she had three other encounters with police. Once again, the justice system enables such women to get away with obvious contraventions of the law. Any time spent “languishing” in the county lock-up is just the “pause button” before they’re released and can re-ingrain themselves back to their “normal” life of playing the gender card.

As the evidentiary standards for men accused of sexual crimes in both colleges and courts continue to be watered-down, women like Davis avoid even the specter of actual sexual assault charges. When finally confronted by the law over the break-in, the charges she faced included attempted sexual assault.

What threshold does a woman have to cross to be accused of a sexual assault, rather than its attempt? As you might have read in past weeks, women like braindead “comedienne” Farah Brook are excused for sexual assault and harassment by kissing while men are arrested and convicted for trying it.

Praise be to the Internet

I hope Megan Rae Davis is putting these REAL photos of herself on Tinder, along with the moniker “Texan Sexual Deviant Girl”.

The glory of our technological age is that we can make examples of these women. There are undoubtedly many people, in Davis’ own community to boot, who will make excuses for her, fail to reevaluate any good opinions they previously had of her, and all-round rationalize what she did (“it wasn’t really sexual assault anyway”).

Yet large swathes of others, both nearby and far away from her, will gossip about her, chide her actions, mock and exclude her. This is what we want. Although a far cry from true justice, the exposure of terrible, sociopathic human beings like Davis is creating waves.

Importantly, women like Davis are highly superficial, unintelligent and vacuous. Her booking photos, which make her look like a meth addict, are probably to her the worst things to come out of this case. It certainly isn’t the dignity, wellbeing, and rights of her victim, or the feelings of her cuckolded husband. To the internet, Davis’ actions have announced, “I’m a sexual deviant slut.” And now we know that, sans make-up, she looks like one, too.

Where art thou, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand?

“I’m not normally a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Senator Gillibrand.”

I will presume professional superheroes like New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand utilize a pre-1845 map of America which does not include Texas. Once they finally figure out that Texas is indeed a state within the Union, they’ll surely arrive on the scene in the interest of fairness to all sexual assault victims. Davis’ victim will be invited to the State of the Union address next year as Gillibrand’s guest and she’ll spend countless hours advocating on his and other men’s behalf.

Or not.

The massive let off for Megan Rae Davis underscores that all men within our special community must contribute to the outing, shaming, and misery of women who escape proper legal sanction via the gender card. Every time, era, and epoch has its builders and protectors of justice. We, my friends, are those men, wearing today’s clothes.

Read More: Why Black America Must Be Careful

207 thoughts on “Orally Raping A Man Won’t Get You Indicted In America”

  1. If I feel my dick in a mouth the first thing I’ll do is think “that better be a woman”. Second thought will be “That better be a pretty woman” and I’ll be reaching for my handgun while I find out.
    Texas just might be patriarchal on this matter. I think possibly the mentality is that women DO indeed lack self control and cannot be held any more accountable for it than we would send a toddler to jail for having a tantrum.
    The folly is in that we give these “children” all kinds of equal rights alongside the unequal consideration and consequences under the laws. I think this is known as “having your cake and eating it too”.

        1. Every time I hear that fat-girl anthem by Meghan Trainor in a public place I assholishly mock it out loud with “I’m all about that cake, about that cake, no salad!”

    1. ” I’ll be reaching for my handgun while I find out. ” You’re gonna make sure your dick is out of her mouth first right?

    2. I’d still shoot her since she probably is some hideous-looking girl wanting attention.

    3. ” I think possibly the mentality is that women DO indeed lack self
      control and cannot be held any more accountable for it than we would
      send a toddler to jail for having a tantrum.”
      It would appear logical to apply discipline to whomever may misbehave, however lightly or egregiously. Even children often receive some form of discipline. However, when women misbehave they are often allowed to continue their misbehavior without punishment. In my opinion, discipline/punishment is all the more necessary when an individual lacks self control. Doing otherwise only encourages poor behavior.

    4. “If I feel my dick in a mouth the first thing I’ll do is think “that better be a woman”. Second thought will be “That better be a pretty woman” and I’ll be reaching for my handgun while I find out. ”
      And if she is? Just let her continue. There, right there, you admitted you would hold back if she was hot. Implying you clearly want to be “raped” by the feminist definition.
      “Texas just might be patriarchal on this matter. I think possibly the mentality is that women DO indeed lack self control and cannot be held any more accountable for it than we would send a toddler to jail for having a tantrum.”
      The patriarchal thing to do would be to laugh in this man’s face and maybe give him a high five.
      “The folly is in that we give these “children” all kinds of equal rights alongside the unequal consideration and consequences under the laws. I think this is known as ‘having your cake and eating it too’.”
      Unrelated non-sequitur. Or are you worried now about 16 year old boys waking up to blowjobs?

      1. I don’t think you realize that this is not an overly serious website. So save the long soliloquy for the HuffandPuff Post.

    5. Interesting take on this DJ and I totally agree with you. I think it is fine to treat women as if they are children, not morally responsible for their actions because they don’t have the moral compass or intellect over emotion capacity to make decisions on their own. Texas has the right of this. If only the get the other side of the house in order where, while loosing all responsibility and culpability for their actions, they also give up the insane amount of power that the world has bestowed on them and then we can get back to things the way nature intended.

    6. If I feel my dick in a mouth the first thing I’ll do is think “that better be a woman”. Second thought will be “That better be a pretty woman”
      : This quote alone is worthy of Internet legend, and should be propagated far and wide.

    7. “If I feel my dick in a mouth the first thing I’ll do is think “that better be a woman”. Second thought will be “That better be a pretty woman” and I’ll be reaching for my handgun while I find out.” – dude. as a feminist gawker on this website, I have to say, that you totally just rocked out as a true oppressor of men everywhere. It’s statements like this that support the idea that men can’t get raped, because of course they all want their dicks sucked all the time. Statements like this prevent other men from reporting rape, and the lack of reports contribute to the lack of belief in female on male sexual assault. You’re totally causing your own problems. OR, you are a rape survivor, and hearing statements like these made you feel that you had to laugh it off. If someone raped you, you do not have to laugh it off to maintain your masculinity. It’s OK. You can talk about it, you can report it, even if things that were done to you are usually associated with gay sex, it doesn’t make you gay. So if that’s the case, I urge you to speak out, and help give other men the courage to do the same.

  2. the most fucked up thing is though… even though she started this by sexually touching him while he is asleep (and which means she sexually assaulted him), she can quickly lie and say the reverse and have the man arrested all while the man was still asleep… ridiculous how much power women have today. All it takes is her words that can end a man’s life. In this case, she just got away with playing around with him. If she had much more evil intentions, the man could have gotten his penis chopped off or accused of sexual harassment even though she touched him first. Just wild speculations that can be possible in today’s fucked up feminist world. The society and SJWs that allow this shit to happen and just give her a slap on the wrist treatment are the ones that allow and produce cunts like these.

  3. Women can rape men = the sexes are equal = Feminist propaganda
    Name one civilization prior to 1960 that considered female-on-male rape to be even possible? Hint: There isn’t one. It never occurred to any civilization for over ten thousand years to consider female-on-male rape a serious crime, and here you have the manosphere peddling a dangerous myth. The female vagina has no ability to rape a male dick and by extension women cannot rape men.
    “The glory of our technological age is that we can make examples of these women. There are undoubtedly many people, in Davis’ own community to boot, who will make excuses for her, fail to reevaluate any good opinions they previously had of her, and all-round rationalize what she did”
    These “excuses” are what we people in the normal/sane world call logic and common sense.
    “Yet large swathes of others, both nearby and far away from her, will gossip about her, chide her actions, mock and exclude her. This is what we want. Although a far cry from true justice, the exposure of terrible, sociopathic human beings like Davis is creating waves.”
    Instead of giving her a medal and congratulating her as a hero. The true sociopath in this case is you for limiting male options. I’m sure myself and plenty of men would be delighted to wake up to a blowjob, even if she’s ugly, it’s free and easy head. What more could you want? The f-to-m rape is a real red herring to help introduce ever expanding definition of rape, which is by and large the most exaggerated and overblown “epidemic” in history.
    http://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2009/10/feminists-believe-women-can-rape-men.html

    1. well she was tried with sexual assault, if she came in and straddled your sleeping daughter or cat some kind of sex crime should apply

      1. No more than the violence used or perhaps the breaking and entering charge would really be required.

      2. It’s always depends on “who” is involved. The mainstream media didn’t even cover it because the criminal was a woman and the victim was a male.
        Change it to the victim was a child and it’s reported on by all of the big networks. It’s only a man? Nah, no story.
        Reverse the positions and it’s front page news (that poor woman). Too much truth does hurt.

        1. This is dumb, the very posting this article on a fairly popular news site basically disproves your entire point that the “media” is ignoring it.

        2. I thought this was a blog for masculine men. Men scared of sex and head, holy shit, fuck, they should get their heads examined.

        3. Yeah, that’s it, you figured it all out, detective.
          Now, carry your sorry ass back to Jezebel or XoJane.

    2. okay so let’s say she was sucking this guy’s dick in which she was according to the story…. and now let’s say the guy retaliates by shoving her away and she gets mad that she got “rejected” and yells false “boy cried wolf” style tantrum and false say he physically and sexually assaulted her? If the man does not want to have sex with her and he is either forced or is taken advantage of, then yes that should constitute as a rape and she should be punished…
      If society allows girls like her to get away with shit like that, it only makes it worse for our society because if society whiteknights for women’s bad behavior it only encourage them to do more bad behavior. They have to be put back in their place.

      1. “okay so let’s say she was sucking this guy’s dick in which she was according to the story…. and now let’s say the guy retaliates by shoving her away and she gets mad that she got “rejected” and yells false “boy cried wolf” style tantrum and false say he physically and sexually assaulted her? If the man does not want to have sex with her and he is either forced or is taken advantage of, then yes that should constitute as a rape and she should be punished…”
        So basically we will combat a large feminist police state by adding ever more feminist police state style laws? This is dumb, ridiculously dumb. A women telling you to have sex with them unless they’ll rape you, that’s a luxury problem, not one that should be taken seriously.
        “If society allows girls like her to get away with shit like that, it only makes it worse for our society because if society whiteknights for women’s bad behavior it only encourage them to do more bad behavior. They have to be put back in their place.”
        White-knighting already happened in society for thousands of years yet not once in human history before 1960 did we here of a story of white knights defending a woman who “raped” a man. White knights already excuse bad female behavior like violence or false rape accusations. The idea that white knights will defend the woman in all cases is dumb considering your average mangina on the street believes women CAN rape men. This in and of itself is why I cannot take it seriously, all of these arguments are simply manospherian style rants with no logic behind them.

        1. so what do you suggest? brush it off? Women should get a taste of consequences for their own negative action. If feminists designed complicated rape laws then they should also get a taste of their own medicine too. It will make them think twice before trying to assert their hallucinated power over us. I know it sounds ridiculous to fight fire with fire but sometimes it may be the best method. This should not extend to just “rape” laws. If a woman for example tries to harm a man and actually does physically assault a man (like that last article about a British girl who smashed a man’s skull with bottle), then women should face legal justice just as if a man was to do it. Basically no women should be given pussy pass just because they are women.
          This is probably not the best example but let’s take a look at Afghanistan. Would women dare challenge men there? No because as soon as she gets out of the way, she will be killed. Now while I’m not advocating such extremity to happen here, I would have to mention that women have to be put in their place by men. United States and other western countries give women TOO much freedom. Now that is on the other end of the extremity. We need to adopt an example from East Asian societies where women have freedom but know their roles because they live in collective society where reputation and saving face is the biggest cultural facet. Shaming works so better there.
          You said… ”
          A women telling you to have sex with them unless they’ll rape you, that’s a luxury problem, not one that should be taken seriously.”
          My reply to that would be if a serious upstanding and honest family man gets blackmailed and is threatened by another female that he has to have sex with her or else she will report him with false accusation then to that man, it should be taken seriously. These things can ruin a stable, nuclear family which is what’s lacking in western countries today.
          And plus
          Not every man wants to fuck every chick. If some girls are horrendously ugly, fat, or otherwise, I”m not going to be happy to be forced to fuck or get my dick sucked…

        2. so what do you suggest? brush it off? Women should get a taste of consequences for their own negative action. If feminists designed complicated rape laws then they should also get a taste of their own medicine too. It will make them think twice before trying to assert their hallucinated power over us. I know it sounds ridiculous to fight fire with fire but sometimes it may be the best method. This should not extend to just “rape” laws. If a woman for example tries to harm a man and actually does physically assault a man (like that last article about a British girl who smashed a man’s skull with bottle), then women should face legal justice just as if a man was to do it. Basically no women should be given pussy pass just because they are women.
          This is probably not the best example but let’s take a look at Afghanistan. Would women dare challenge men there? No because as soon as she gets out of the way, she will be killed. Now while I’m not advocating such extremity to happen here, I would have to mention that women have to be put in their place by men. United States and other western countries give women TOO much freedom. Now that is on the other end of the extremity. We need to adopt an example from East Asian societies where women have freedom but know their roles because they live in collective society where reputation and saving face is the biggest cultural facet. Shaming works so better there.
          You said… ”
          A women telling you to have sex with them unless they’ll rape you, that’s a luxury problem, not one that should be taken seriously.”
          My reply to that would be if a serious upstanding and honest family man gets blackmailed and is threatened by another female that he has to have sex with her or else she will report him with false accusation then to that man, it should be taken seriously. These things can ruin a stable, nuclear family which is what’s lacking in western countries today.
          And plus
          Not every man wants to fuck every chick. If some girls are horrendously ugly, fat, or otherwise, I”m not going to be happy to be forced to fuck or get my dick sucked…

        3. “so what do you suggest? brush it off? Women should get a taste of consequences for their own negative action. If feminists designed complicated rape laws then they should also get a taste of their own medicine too.”
          I’ll show them that we can be imprison people for no reason for years as well! That’ll show them! Even though feminists were the ones that pushed for these types of laws in the first place.
          “It will make them think twice before trying to assert their hallucinated power over us.”
          Oh god, dude, sounds almost like MGTOW paranoia. That women will violate us with their vaginas! The horror! The tragedy!
          “I know it sounds ridiculous to fight fire with fire but sometimes it may be the best method.”
          It doesn’t just sound ridiculous, it is ridiculous, it plays into the feminist hand of anti-sex, sex negative views and an ever expanding definition of rape.
          “This should not extend to just “rape” laws. If a woman for example tries to harm a man and actually does physically assault a man (like that last article about a British girl who smashed a man’s skull with bottle), then women should face legal justice just as if a man was to do it. Basically no women should be given pussy pass just because they are women.”
          Women can commit violence against men, that is clear and logically makes sense. A woman raping a man? You’re dreaming.
          “This is probably not the best example but let’s take a look at Afghanistan. Would women dare challenge men there? No because as soon as she gets out of the way, she will be killed. Now while I’m not advocating such extremity to happen here, I would have to mention that women have to be put in their place by men. United States and other western countries give women TOO much freedom.”
          I agree they have too much freedom per say but the extreme examples of Afghanistan doesn’t make sense to me. What we are comparing is a backward third-world shithole to America. Of course what they never tell you is that many women are happy there but no, ignore that, they must all be miserable because they aren’t whores who dress up like whores in public like ameriskanks? Again the feminists in America are 1000x more of a threat than the Taliban ever were/are. Joining the female taliban(feminism) in their militant religion to criminalize all heterosexual relationships is not the solution.
          “Now that is on the other end of the extremity. We need to adopt an example from East Asian societies where women have freedom but know their roles because they live in collective society where reputation and saving face is the biggest cultural facet. Shaming works so better there.”
          Yes it does work better there, there is no denying that. But I fail to see what this has to do with f-to-m rape? Even the rest of the paragraph is mostly incoherent with loose connections.
          “My reply to that would be if a serious upstanding and honest family man gets blackmailed and is threatened by another female that he has to have sex with her or else she will report him with false accusation then to that man, it should be taken seriously. These things can ruin a stable, nuclear family which is what’s lacking in western countries today.”
          Haha, I guess but let’s be real here man, how often does this happen? No, seriously. If your biggest problem is someone demanding sex then I can’t possibly take that seriously. This is fucking classic. Again prior to 1960 the ability of women to do this to men existed, as white knights existed, but yet it magically never happened.
          “Not every man wants to fuck every chick. If some girls are horrendously ugly, fat, or otherwise, I”m not going to be happy to be forced to fuck or get my dick sucked…”
          So basically cherry-picking, most guys would be okay with the vast majority of women doing this to them. It is quite undeniable that most men would fuck most women. It’s true. You know it is. And so what? You fuck a fat/ugly chick? It ain’t high school anymore. No one either cares or needs to know.

    3. All that is being asked for here is equal treatment under the law. Without it, you have second class citizenry and no real rule of law.
      As I recall it was feminists who, tired of “well there was no penetration” in the usual false rape accusation case, clamored for a host of sex crime laws where there not even need be a penis involved (the use thereof).
      Eventually it will get to the point of her clapping her hands and saying “take him away” merely because he was in the same aisle at the shopping center or sitting across the path in a subway car and he made her feel “uneasy” for some reason.
      So no. The Cuntocracy must have its feet put to very fires they lit and stoked in order for it to serve as a warning for women.
      The turning point will be when women have to register for the selective service or forfeit voting rights and access to educational benefits or grants.
      Tit for tat, fair is fair.

      1. Don’t bother with this one.
        ‘Men’ like ‘him’ can be summed up with ‘his’ third sentence in ‘his’ last sixth paragraph. There are guys out there who have been mentally traumatized by female-on-male rape. ‘He’ will most likely respond with the lack of evidence.
        The reasoning is simple. The police just laugh it off. The reason why women never seemed to rape men back then is because men had better control over their women. Even if a man did get raped by a woman back then, most likely he was told to toughen up.
        In short:-
        1) People like ‘him’ have the mentality that all guys are down for sex 24/7.
        2) People like ‘him’ consider rape as penis penetration into the vagina without consent. That is the most accurate definition I can conclude from all this. Everything is else is invalid.

        1. “There are guys out there who have been mentally traumatized by female-on-male rape.”
          Traumatized because they believe in the non-sense that the peddlers in the feminist and abuse industry have been pushing for years. The action itself of a woman riding your dick/sucking your dick is not traumatizing unless you are a homo.
          “The reasoning is simple. The police just laugh it off.”
          Kind of like a “no duh” moment you had here.
          “The reason why women never seemed to rape men back then is because men had better control over their women.”
          No, it’s because men didn’t believe in ridiculous horseshit like women can rape men.
          “Even if a man did get raped by a woman back then, most likely he was told to toughen up.”
          Toughen up? Probably not, he would probably more likely be considered a homosexual. The idea of men being told to toughen up as a complete response just reeks of things like the good men project. Maybe you would be happier there. Men being told to “toughen up” wouldn’t even happen, it would be laughed out of the room as I previously said.
          “1) People like ‘him’ have the mentality that all guys are down for sex 24/7.”
          I consider myself to have an average level of testosterone yet even I am down for sex 24/7. If you’re not you may want to check your T-levels.
          “2) People like ‘him’ consider rape as penis penetration into the vagina without consent. That is the most accurate definition I can conclude from all this. Everything is else is invalid.”
          I would also consider male on male rape as rape but that’s besides the issue. Again the female vagina cannot violate a male penis. Consider that statement I just said before you post again. It sounds all scary when you shroud it with words like “rape” or “assault” as your pavlovian mind freaks out at these words. But what it really boils down to is your idea a vagina can violate a penis more than perhaps the violence used to make that happen. Now does it make sense?

        2. “Men” like you who take it up the butt angers me. Using the word “traumatized” earns you a big: Fuck off!

      2. “All that is being asked for here is equal treatment under the law. Without it, you have second class citizenry and no real rule of law.”
        This is based on the assumption that male and female bodies/minds work in the same way. I would assume that anyone that has spent a good time on the “manosphere” would believe differently by now. You will be a second class citizen because women will break into your house and suck your dick? That’s second class citizenry? Sign me up.
        “As I recall it was feminists who, tired of “well there was no penetration” in the usual false rape accusation case, clamored for a host of sex crime laws where there not even need be a penis involved”
        Yes and no. Actually British common law standards stated that only a penis could rape. You are correct at the new host of feminist laws being created, and one of them was the female can rape male laws. Hence why prior to 1960 it never happened, because no society had a sufficient level of feminism and egalitarian bullcrap.
        “Eventually it will get to the point of her clapping her hands and saying “take him away” merely because he was in the same aisle at the shopping center or sitting across the path in a subway car and he made her feel “uneasy” for some reason.”
        Implying I like feminism and the laws it created? The feminist laws are ridiculous, and one of those laws was the f-to-m rape laws, and I am pointing out its silliness. Why is this law morally right while all the other are wrong? In my opinion they are all wrong.
        “So no. The Cuntocracy must have its feet put to very fires they lit and stoked in order for it to serve as a warning for women. The turning point will be when women have to register for the selective service or forfeit voting rights and access to educational benefits or grants. Tit for tat, fair is fair.”
        I’m sure this makes sense, it has all the general MRA talking points. But I am going to ask, what does this really have to do with a vagina being able to rape a penis? Seriously? These are apples and oranges.

      3. “The turning point will be when women have to register for the selective
        service or forfeit voting rights and access to educational benefits or
        grants.”
        I’m not Amish, but this is the first I’ve heard of ‘selective service’. If it works for women in places like Israel, why not the US.

      4. “The turning point will be when women have to register for the selective
        service or forfeit voting rights and access to educational benefits or
        grants.”
        I’m not Amish, but this is the first I’ve heard of ‘selective service’. If it works for women in places like Israel, why not the US.

      5. Don’t waste your time on this idiot. Too much logic involved (and this troll is probably a woman – maybe a white knight). I say woman because the logic should seep in if the person was a man (but it’s not). Women wanted equality, they got it and now men are asking “so where is the equality?”.
        It’s not that hard to figure out….unless you’re a god damn woman.

        1. So now you are pushing for the feminist definition of equality? And you don’t consider yourself a white knight? The gaps in logic are starting to compound upon themselves.

        2. ‘YouAreADumbShit’ is right and you and your kin are doing more damage than good. What you are proposin is Equal injustice for all, instead of justice for men i false rape cases.
          Women cant rape men, conceptually or technically.

      6. There is a sign posted up publicly (a handwritten note actually) on a major thoroughfare at my local university. A woman “felt uneasy” at this man who is “always staring at her” and masterbating from his car (possible, but I doubt she got close enough to see, and seems very unlikely to me). So she publicly posted this note for everyone to be on the lookout for this “creepy guy” who was looking at her when she was in public. With all the ridiculous rules we see on campuses, it won’t be long until glancing at a woman becomes a hate crime, surely.

        1. She was just looking for more attention by advertising her route and implying she was so hot that “creepy dude(s)” lurk in their vehicles spanking their monkeys to her steamy allure.

    4. I’ve heard some ridiculous justifications and rationalizations for female behavior, but this is without a doubt the most pathetic. “Don’t punish her for assaulting him, then she might not come suck my dick!” I wouldn’t really hold my breath on waiting for that to happen if I were you.
      And, dude, speak for yourself, I don’t want some nasty ugly ho putting her hands or lips or anything else on me. And obviously this guy didn’t either, or he wouldn’t have reported it to the police. As far as limiting male options go, the only one doing that here is you, (going by that blog post you linked) since you want to deny men the right to legal protection from sexual assault. All because you can’t get any. The thing is, what you’re doing is just another form of pedestalization. Put some money together and hire a hooker or two and get yourself laid. It’ll do wonders for you.

      1. “I’ve heard some ridiculous justifications and rationalizations for female behavior, but this is without a doubt the most pathetic.”
        Hah! Now this I sincerely doubt.
        “I wouldn’t really hold my breath on waiting for that to happen if I were you.”
        Exactly, the proposition itself is absolutely silly. Waiting for it to happen? I know it’ll never happen, but that doesn’t mean I believe innocent women should be punished for when they do it.
        “And, dude, speak for yourself, I don’t want some nasty ugly ho putting her hands or lips or anything else on me.”
        This guy kids himself, believing the law should be extremely prejudiced, illogical, and unfair because “the chick might be ugly”. It’s no different from sexual harassment laws for women because the dude might be ugly.
        “And obviously this guy didn’t either, or he wouldn’t have reported it to the police.”
        The police in a sane non-Western country would just laugh at him until he left.
        “As far as limiting male options go, the only one doing that here is you, (going by that blog post you linked) since you want to deny men the right to legal protection from sexual assault.”
        Sexual assault from what? Getting woken up via blowjobs? How awful. That’s like saying you want to ban ice cream to provide protection for those with lactose intolerance.
        “All because you can’t get any.”
        I don’t get much action, I won’t deny it, that being the case I do not believe those who do should be arbitrarily punished for it. It’s entirely irrelevant. I don’t do crack, but I don’t want every crackhead to spend a decade behind bars.
        “The thing is, what you’re doing is just another form of pedestalization. Put some money together and hire a hooker or two and get yourself laid. It’ll do wonders for you.”
        Pedestalization is one of the dumbest manosphere concepts by far, considering whole blogs(like this one) are devoted onto making you look/feel better to get women. Saying I pedestalize on a website that does nothing but glorify those men who get sex and are good with women, yea that makes a lot of sense.
        “Put some money together and hire a hooker or two and get yourself laid. It’ll do wonders for you.”
        I did when I went to Nevada recently, it was fun as fuck!

        1. “I did when I went to Nevada recently, it was fun as fuck!”
          Ewww, you actually drilled one of those pasty cumdumpsters?

        2. You get dumber every time you speak.
          Exactly, the proposition itself is absolutely silly. Waiting for it to happen? I know it’ll never happen, but that doesn’t mean I believe innocent women should be punished for when they do it.
          This is an oxymoron, innocent means she didn’t do it, if she did it, then she’s not innocent.
          This guy kids himself, believing the law should be extremely prejudiced, illogical, and unfair because “the chick might be ugly”. It’s no different from sexual harassment laws for women because the dude might be ugly.
          This statement is so idiotic it would actually take several paragraphs to parse it completely. So I’ll just make a couple of quick points. First of all sexual harassment laws are largely bullshit designed to extort money from companies, it doesn’t make any sense to compare them to sexual assault which is a real crime. Secondly there’s nothing prejudiced illogical or unfair about a person having rights over their own body. Put simply (and somehow I think it’s still going to go over your head) why a person decides they don’t want a particular individual to touch them is irrelevant. Whether it’s because they’re ugly, they don’t want to betray a a relationship, or some other reason, it doesn’t matter. They still have a right to say don’t touch me.
          Sexual assault from what? Getting woken up via blowjobs? How awful. Depends on whether or not you want the blowjob. If you don’t, then yes it can be very awful. That’s like saying you want to ban ice cream to provide protection for those with lactose intolerance. Not even close. If a person doesn’t want ice cream, all they have to do is not eat it. What I want would be like banning someone from forcing someone to eat something they didn’t want to.
          I don’t get much action, I won’t deny it, that being the case I do not believe those who do should be arbitrarily punished for it. It’s entirely irrelevant. I don’t do crack, but I don’t want every crackhead to spend a decade behind bars. And the stupid just keeps coming. I’m not saying punish someone for getting some action. I’m saying punish someone for forcing themselves on someone else. Those are two very different things, even if they appear to be similar on a physical level. Let me give you an example. If I reach into my wallet and take some money out, that’s just fine. If you reach into my wallet out that’s a crime.
          Pedestalization is one of the dumbest manosphere concepts by far, considering whole blogs(like this one) are devoted onto making you look/feel better to get women. Saying I pedestalize on a website that does nothing but glorify those men who get sex and are good with women, yea that makes a lot of sense.
          You seem to think pedestalization refers to glorifying men. It doesn’t. Pedestalization is where a male thinks women are inherently better than men simply because they’re female. When I say what you’re doing is a form of pedestalization I mean that you seem to think that any sex act between a man and a woman is somehow always a transfer of value from the woman to the man. This is, of course wrong.
          Most sex acts (that are consensual) are an exchange of value, that is both parties get something out of it. When the act isn’t consensual, then usually one party gets, and the other party loses.
          “Put some money together and hire a hooker or two and get yourself laid. It’ll do wonders for you.”
          I did when I went to Nevada recently, it was fun as fuck!
          I’m kinda hoping this is a lie, because if you’ve manged to get laid and you’re still this f’ed in the head about the issue, then it’s likely there’s no hope for you at all. Based on what you’ve posted here and the blog post you linked you’ve got a bad case of solipsism with some narcissism thrown in. You’re incapable of seeing anything except from you’re point of view.
          Since you would want to be woke up by a blowjob from a nasty skank then that means everybody else wants it to. If they say otherwise they’re lying or confused or just saying it to make you feel bad because they know you’ll never have that. Thing is, this isn’t about you, most things aren’t. And the sooner you realize that, the better off you’ll be.
          Or not. Whichever floats your boat. Either way I’ve already spent too much time on it.

        3. Beat it, white knight. That feminist shaming shit doesn’t work here. The door is —————————->

        4. A pasty cumdumpster isn’t necessarily fat, just look at the oral rapist in this article for instance, monkeyspank…

        5. “This is an oxymoron, innocent means she didn’t do it, if she did it, then she’s not innocent.”
          Well considering female on male rape doesn’t exist, yes she is.
          “First of all sexual harassment laws are largely bullshit designed to extort money from companies, it doesn’t make any sense to compare them to sexual assault which is a real crime.”
          And female on male “rape” laws are largely bullshit used by feminists to expand the ever burgeoning definition of rape. How hard is that to get through your head?
          “Secondly there’s nothing prejudiced illogical or unfair about a person having rights over their own body.”
          Spoken like a tried and true feminist. Having “permission” to control your body to save yourself from getting blowjobs or sex is fucking stupid for men. This is an arbitrary constraint cast down and basically word for word feminazi garbage only this time you are putting men in the place with women. Even though men and women are NOT THE SAME! Holy fuck.
          “Whether it’s because they’re ugly, they don’t want to betray a a relationship, or some other reason, it doesn’t matter. They still have a right to say don’t touch me.Whether it’s because they’re ugly, they don’t want to betray a a relationship, or some other reason, it doesn’t matter. They still have a right to say don’t touch me.”
          Now he officially rides off the stupid train and show that he is in fact anti-sex and sex negative, a position only come about by the most puritanical reasoning imaginable. He’s not just anti-sex, he’s anti-touch folks, man.
          “Depends on whether or not you want the blowjob. If you don’t, then yes it can be very awful.”
          Hahahahaha oh my God, wake up dude, blowjobs are fucking great you fucking kidding me? What a dork.
          “Not even close. If a person doesn’t want ice cream, all they have to do is not eat it. What I want would be like banning someone from forcing someone to eat something they didn’t want to.”
          What I was getting it was that you are making protections that are wide-sweeping for everyone when many men (like myself) do not want more sex restrictions. This is fucking obvious.
          “You seem to think pedestalization refers to glorifying men. It doesn’t. Pedestalization is where a male thinks women are inherently better than men simply because they’re female. When I say what you’re doing is a form of pedestalization I mean that you seem to think that any sex act between a man and a woman is somehow always a transfer of value from the woman to the man. This is, of course wrong.”
          How is it wrong? How many of you PUAs and other types value yourself based on notches? Or lays per week/month? Tons. So you seem to say it isn’t a transfer of value when obviously for those in the PUA world(like this blog) is a gigantic transfer of value. Even outside this blog it is obvious that men who get sex frequently are more confident and feel more valued. Pedestalization goes on in all communities, you just express it differently than the mainstream.
          “Most sex acts (that are consensual) are an exchange of value, that is both parties get something out of it. When the act isn’t consensual, then usually one party gets, and the other party loses.”
          Sometimes, but generally the male benefits far more from this exchange. This would explain why men will “hunt” for women at bars and clubs while women will not do the same for men. Clearly the man at the end of the day thinks he is getting a better deal.
          “I’m kinda hoping this is a lie, because if you’ve manged to get laid and you’re still this f’ed in the head about the issue, then it’s likely there’s no hope for you at all. Based on what you’ve posted here and the blog post you linked you’ve got a bad case of solipsism with some narcissism thrown in. You’re incapable of seeing anything except from you’re point of view.”
          Oh my man, this is funny. When I was teenager my friends and I would joke about being “raped” by female teachers. That was the golden age of the 90’s with all of those stories. It was a joke. When I grew into being a progressive egalitarian I actually believed it was possible for women to rape men. My view had changed based on peer pressure. Now that I am no longer progressive I had to challenge all of my previously held worldviews. When I came to this issue and found some articles I nearly slapped myself for ever being so stupid.
          “Since you would want to be woke up by a blowjob from a nasty skank then that means everybody else wants it to. If they say otherwise they’re lying or confused or just saying it to make you feel bad because they know you’ll never have that. Thing is, this isn’t about you, most things aren’t. And the sooner you realize that, the better off you’ll be.”
          You don’t want to get blowjobs from women? I don’t know man it might be time to get out of the closet and get some fresh air. Fuck are you talking about?

        6. She was probably about a 7, not that expensive, why do you care anyway?

        7. HAH! White knight! Classic. Women can rape men is a feminist idea, defending it makes you the white knight and the mangina defender of feminist policy.

        8. I’m now asking myself, is this guy really as stupid and pathetic as he seems? There is a big difference between a touch you want, and a touch you don’t want.
          Just because I’d like to have sex with Scarlett Johansson doesn’t mean I want to get dirty with Roseanne Barr. If you can’t see the difference between those two, then you have mental problems beyond the ability of modern science to even properly quantify.
          And dude, at this point I’m hoping you’re a troll, because I would much rather believe that I’ve wasted my time with a troll than that someone like you appear to be actually exists.

        9. Jesus was a dirty socialist in the desert, his teachings in 2015 are about as valid as witchcraft and voodoo. His religion has failed the West. Look elsewhere.

        10. “I’m now asking myself, is this guy really as stupid and pathetic as he seems? There is a big difference between a touch you want, and a touch you don’t want.”
          For this guy, blowjobs and sex = don’t want, so I wouldn’t take his opinions too seriously.
          “Just because I’d like to have sex with Scarlett Johansson doesn’t mean I want to get dirty with Roseanne Barr.”
          Using the most extreme ends of the spectrum doesn’t dissuade me at all, it’s ultimately just a form of cherry picking.
          “If you can’t see the difference between those two, then you have mental problems beyond the ability of modern science to even properly quantify.”
          And I suppose everyone born before the baby boomer generation just had “serious mental problems” since antiquity, right? Hmm.
          “And dude, at this point I’m hoping you’re a troll, because I would much rather believe that I’ve wasted my time with a troll than that someone like you appear to be actually exists.”
          I hope the same thing with you, no one can be this stupid. Let’s re-iterate, a vagina cannot violate a penis, it is impossible, I have yet to see a reasonable argument that proves this impossible. All I see f-to-m rape is another feminist red herring in order to impose more draconian, puritanical, sex negative laws, as they have for the last five decades.

        11. I remember when Maureen was on here! Oh man those were good times. Back when RoK used to be funny and fun to read, now it’s talking about the epidemic of females having sex with men and giving them surprise head. Fuck man.

        12. Now I have to ask, are you capable of honesty? You have lied, repeatedly. To me, about things I’ve said. As if somehow I wouldn’t know what I’ve said. But I will give you one last chance to respond honestly. And that is by asking you this question. Is there any adult, legally competent human female you would turn down consensual sex from provided there were no negative consequences from it outside the sex itself?
          There are three possible responses: 1. Yes. As in yes you would turn sex down. In which case despite whatever you’ve said to contrary on this thread, you would be saying that a woman can sexually assault a man.
          2. No. Which has two possible interpretations. Either you’re trolling or you honestly would have sex with any female no matter how beastly and you are simply incapable of understanding that another man may not want the same. In which case we can agree to disagree.
          3. Any other response, means you’re a troll.
          Whichever way you respond I’m done with this topic with you because if a person is unable, or unwilling, to take part in honest discourse; what’s the point? For me, there isn’t one. The only thing at stake here is your integrity. Answer and let any interested third party decide for themselves just how much you have.

        13. Rigel Kent, your logic does not prove what you think it does. Just because men don’t want to have sex with literally all women doesn’t mean women can rape men. If a man is forced by a woman he does not want, it might be assault, but not rape. If the man insists on pressing charges, something like simple assault could reasonably be applicable, or worse if there is serious violence, but the sexual aspect is irrelevant and does not aggravate the crime in the mind of a reasonable person. Only a moron — no, actually morons aren’t that stupid since no one did it historically before feminism — only a feminist or mangina would classify it as rape.

        14. Before I respond further I will ask if the person posting under Eivind Berge is the same as the person posting under the ID YouAreDumbAsShit? If you are the same than you are a troll and no further response is necessary.
          On the off chance that you are not the same person, I will just say that if the term rape gets your panties in such a bunch then call it sexual assault. The term you use just isn’t that important, the important part is that she should be held responsible for her actions and not get off on a pussy pass. And calling somebody a mangina because they think a woman should be held accountable is like calling water dry. The word doesn’t just not fit, it’s the opposite of the truth.

        15. I very much agree with what “YouAreDumbAsShit” says, but I am not the same person.
          Actually, it makes a big difference what we call it, because calling it “rape” or “sexual assault” instead of “simple assault” means the potential sentence is tremendously increased and even the minimum sentence would usually be far more than what the crime deserves. It is a category error to classify female sexual coercion as a sex crime. Firstly, it is just plain wrong because it goes against biology and common sense. Secondly, it is immoral and cruel because women don’t deserve many years in prison for crimes that most men consider trivial luxury problems or no crimes at all (it is not a “pussy pass” to be treated fairly). And thirdly, it is a horribly harebrained strategy if you mean to oppose feminist corruption of justice, because experience tells us that the system is perfectly happy to prosecute women too for these bullshit crimes and have equal injustice for all.

        16. For the purposes of our discussion here it doesn’t make a difference as no criminal jurisdiction in the world is going to be using our postings to make a determination as to how they should prosecute a crime.
          Ideally they should toss rape altogether and rewrite the criminal codes on sex crimes as various degrees of sexual assault as that would make things much more clear and get rid of the connotations using the term rape brings. But they’re not going to do that (or if they did they’d no doubt screw it up even worse than it is right now) so that’s kind of a moot point.
          And you continue to seem unclear on what the words you use mean. Letting someone off because they have a vagina, when someone who didn’t have a vagina would be in serious trouble, is the very definition of a pussy pass.
          Let me try to simplify this for you, do you think women should be held accountable for their actions?
          If you don’t, then we really don’t have anything further to discuss because that’s a divide I just don’t see any way to cross.
          If you do, then you should really rethink some of the things you’ve said, because they really don’t add up.

        17. Yes, I think women should be held accountable for their actions. But women and men are not equal in every respect, contrary to what feminists and manginas claim. A man and a woman having sex are not doing the same thing. The act of penetrating does not even physically resemble the act of getting penetrated, so it takes a tremendous amount of feminist brainwashing to even make the assumption that these acts are equal and should be treated as the same legally. Of course women should be held accountable for real crimes such as violence and murder, but women raping men is not a real crime. You are equally dead if a woman kills you, but you are not equally “raped” if a woman forces you to penetrate her!
          I do believe the category of rape is profoundly meaningful, properly defined, and therefore I disagree with abolishing it in favor of varieties of “sexual assault.” Rape is a biologically meaningful concept that has given rise to adaptations in human nature because it affects reproductive fitness. This is why women are so traumatized by rape beyond just what the physical violence of the act itself would indicate, and this adaptation is precisely what men don’t have! It is conceptually impossible for a vagina to violate a penis in the same sense that men can rape women, because men did not evolve the ability to be so traumatized by it. If anything, we evolved to take advantage of easy reproductive opportunities indiscriminately. At worst, forced sex with women can reasonably qualify as crimes of violence, but not sex.

        18. Yet again you seem to have a problem with what words mean. Take this example here: http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Man-tells-of-shock-pain-after-women-raped-him-in-PE-20150512
          These women held a man at gun point and drugged him to cause an erection and then had sex with him against his will. By your (very loopy) definitions this would count as a violent crime, but not a sexual one. Even though sexual intercourse was an integral part of the crime. Dude, that’s a special kind of dumb you’ve got going on there. It’s kind of like the feminists who claim rape isn’t about sex at all but about power.
          I skimmed a blog post you wrote back in 2009 that somebody linked to earlier. If you’re still an incel, sorry that’s the case, but try to stop judging things based on the jealousy you feel toward men that are getting laid and try to look at things rationally. Those emotions are only going to lead you astray and quite possibly (and probably already have) cause you harm. Remember, as a man, logic is your ally and emotion is your enemy.
          At this point I don’t think either one of is is getting anywhere so I’m just going to bow out. Good luck (and if you haven’t already) hope you get laid soon. It really helps to take the edge off.

        19. No, I am not an incel at this point. I am arguing based on evolutionary biology and common sense and decency. Women raping men simply does not make sense outside a feminist worldview. It is wrong on so many levels as I have explained. Even that highly anomalous South African case is adequately addressed by laws concerning assault and kidnapping and so on; the fact that it was sexual intercourse does not make it rape to any reasonable person. That is a category mistake. It isn’t even claimed to be motivated by sex, but rather to steal semen. I don’t doubt it was a frightening experience, but not because it was sex. Would it have been any less traumatizing if women had kidnapped you to steal your blood, for example? There are plenty of felony crimes applicable to such an offense and you don’t need to make a fool of yourself calling it “rape” to have justice.
          You know what you are? Aside from a mangina, you are oversocialized. That’s the most accurate term for it. You are no doubt sincere in your belief that you are fighting feminism, but actually you are so utterly indoctrinated with feminist ideals that the only mental tool at your disposal to attack feminists is to accuse them of not taking their feminism far enough. It does not even occur to you that feminist tenets like “men and women have equal sexual mentalities” could be wrong. I wrote a blog post on how this works:
          http://eivindberge.blogspot.no/2014/01/oversocialization-explains-female-sex.html

        20. One thing I find amusing is how you keep on saying “a reasonable person” this or that, so if someone disagrees with you automatically they’re unreasonable. It’s a simple rhetorical trick that saves you from having to use facts or logic to make your case, which is good because you really suck at using them. As noted by the fact that you need to keep on making up things I’ve never said or implied to make your “case”.
          I’ve never said or implied that “men and women have equal sexual mentalities”. Nor would I since I don’t believe they do. But this difference is immaterial to the topic at hand. If a person, male or female, doesn’t want sexual contact with someone else and that someone else uses force or subterfuge to obtain sexual contact, then they’ve perpetrated a sexual assault. No matter they’re reason for doing it.
          In some gangs when a new leader would overthrow an old leader sometimes the new leader would rape the old leader. The new leader had no sexual desire for the old, he just wanted to make sure the old leader could never exercise any authority in the gang again without leaving a dead body behind that the police would investigate. But it was still rape.
          I want to note here that your rationale that the motivation for a crime somehow defines the crime is essentially the same type of BS that supporters of hate crime legislation claim. Though perhaps you are a supporter of such nonsense, though it would be an odd position for a self-described libertarian to take.
          I despise what feminists have done so far, so the idea that I would want them to take it farther is ridiculous at best. Men and women are both different and unequal. That fact simply doesn’t change what we’re discussing here.
          If I stab a woman or a man, there are differences. It’ll generally be easier to stab the women because she’ll be slower and weaker. From stabbing the man I’ll be more likely to face immediate consequences as he’ll probably have greater resources (size, strength, etc…) with which to respond, and so on. But what stays the same is I’m wrong to do it no matter the sex of my victim. And I should face severe criminal penalties for it. And that should stay the same no matter what my sex is.
          As to being a mangina, one of us wants to hold this woman responsible for her actions, one of us thinks it would be unfair and indecent to expect the poor little thing to obey the law. Again, you can call water dry all you want, but it’s still all wet. Kind of like you.
          As I said before I don’t think either of us is really accomplishing anything at this point, but I was having an attack of insomnia so at least this gave me something to do while waiting for it to run it’s course. Congrats on getting laid, even if the earlier trauma of being an incel does seem to have left it’s mark. Just try to remember, sex is only really important if you’re not getting it.

        21. The “reasonable person” or “reasonable man standard” is not a simple rhetorical trick, but a venerable legal concept. In order to have a fair justice system, the severity of crimes must be judged by how a reasonable person would react to them. Very few men would react to female sexual coercion the same way women react to rape, so it is utterly illogical and unethical to treat them the same way. I am not denying that any given individual can react and be motivated in highly idiosyncratic ways, but that should not sway legal concepts such as rape. We don’t make laws based on deviants and extremists, but the reasonable person. To me the simple fact that men overwhelmingly laugh at the concept of women “raping” men is enough to banish it from the law. You are fighting an unnatural battle, like arguing that water should flow uphill, and it is a testament to the insanity of our feminist-corrupted legal system that rape law has become gender-neutral.
          You are arguing for extreme unfairness in the justice system if you want to disregard the reasonable man standard. You come across as incredibly immature when you say men and women’s different sexual mentalities are immaterial to how seriously we should judge the sexual coercion of the sexes. You want to abolish common sense and decency and have a purely mechanistic legal system where justice is dispensed by robots with no understanding of human nature based on simplistic categories incapable of distinguishing between elementary categories like men and women. I do not want to live in such a cruel and insane feminist world, so I do my best to resist it.

        22. And another post free of facts and logic and spiced with dishonesty. I’m aware of the legal concept of the reasonable man, but that’s not how your using it. Your using it as a matter of begging the question. Instead of trying to prove that any reasonable person would agree with your interpretation, you’re simply assuming they do and using that to support your argument.
          In support of this I’d like to note the fact that you have provided zero evidence of how a reasonable man would look at the situation. Anyways, I need to get some sleep. Have fun.

        23. The fact that we are having this debate proves that the reasonable man does not take the concept of women raping men seriously. Indeed, you will find skeptical and ridiculing statements like mine below EVERY story of women supposedly “raping” men, while women never ever debate among themselves whether men can rape women. If you still don’t get a clue that men and women are profoundly different in this area, then I don’t know what to tell you.

        24. You’re absolutely right. And the thing that irks me is I really have no one else but myself to blame. Trolls are usually pretty obvious, but sometimes I just let myself get caught up in things. Thanks for the advice. Later.

        25. So pointing out common sense like the fact that women raping men is nonsense is “trolling” now? Women raping men is a radical feminist notion that no one in the world took seriously before the late 20th century, and now this kind of ideology is already so deeply established that questioning it is “trolling”? Even on a supposed men’s forum? Unbelievable.

        26. If that were the case then female schoolteachers would get away with raping young teenaged boys.
          Fortunately, they don’t.
          Furthermore you really haven’t thought this through, there are a number of ways, physically and pharmaceutically speaking, for a female to rape a male.

        27. I have indeed thought this through and written extensively about it. I am well aware that the American justice system has started locking up female schoolteachers for being nice to boys, but that’s because of feminist corruption of justice, not because it is reasonable. And this is the exact sort of insanity I vehemently oppose and feminists like yourself condone.
          I am also well aware that “there are a number of ways, physically and pharmaceutically speaking,” for a female to sexually coerce a male, but you are missing the point. It is CONCEPTUALLY impossible for women to rape or sexually abuse males because female sexual coercion simply doesn’t fit in this category for deep biological reasons. Female sexual coercion is a trivial issue which at most deserves to be treated like a simple assault or whatever the equivalent nonsexual crime would be in the justice system. The sexual aspect does not aggravate the crime; if anything, the fact that the woman wanted sex would feel like an extenuating circumstance for most men.

        28. If you don’t think men can be raped by women check out the movie “Thursday,” then explain how you continue in your belief.

        29. I don’t deny that men can be sexually coerced by women, but it does not carry the same significance as rape, I don’t acknowledge it as such, and I am opposed to legal recognition of women “raping” men. Male sexuality is ontologically incapable of being violated by women in that sense, for deep biological reasons.

        30. Wow! As stupid and patethic that you are yourself, you are not shy of calling People smarter than you stupid and pathetic. Does that make you dumb also?

        31. I dont think your puny little brain is developved enough to understand the very good points Eivind is spoon feeding you.

        32. Those women are making those boys Lucky as hell, and should ofcourse not be punished. The same goes for teachers who fucks Girls, as long as it’s consentual.

        33. Hey YourDumbAsShit…..guess what…..your dumb as shit loser….why do you even waste your time commenting here….obviously no one agrees with your logic so go comment somewhere else and leave us men to continue the discussion that is relevant TO US….because its obviously not an opinion you agree with….thats fine….just go somewhere else because your not going to convince anyone of your views here…..idiot…

        34. This guys argument is completely based on the technical and legal definition of what rape is from previously accepted texts….he is arguing that a man can never rape a woman based on antiquated definitions of rape and is therefore arguing that because feminism has changed the legal definition of rape…that anyone who agrees with this new definition that has been spawned by feminism (which is true), is therefore a participant in the feminist agenda….what he fails to address at all is the fact that as society evolves and changes with time…so do the legal definitions of many acts that one human can commit against another human….in his mind….a woman holding a gun to a mans head while she penetrates him with a dildo…is not rape because that act as an example does not conform to the antiquated definition of rape in the references he uses….that example does however fall well within the newly accepted definition of rape…and since that new definition was created by feminists…if you agree that getting banged up the culo with a dildo by a woman against your will…while having a 9MM pressed against your temple is in fact rape by a woman to a man….than in his logic you will be called a feminist because its the feminists who made it possible for this action to fall under the definition of rape….the problem is that his definitions are antiquated…rape has now, in our society been redefined….it is now legally possible for a woman to rape a man…..yes….feminism has made this legal change in the definition of rape accepted to the bulk of society….that being said….no one is ever going to convince someone who cant accept that legal definitions of various acts humans commit against one another change all the time….off the top of my head a good example is the introduction of first and second degree murder….there used to only be murder as a legal charge and thats it…..as society changed….so did the definition of murder and now murdering someone falls under murder 1, murder 2 and manslaughter……same thing has happened with rape……changing this guys view on the matter would be akin to trying to convince the king on England circa 1350 that the world is round…..people like this will never understand that legal definitions change all the time….and once they are changed….thats it….bitch and moan all you want but the fact is that what you feel and believe and think is now irrelevant as far as it ever having an effect on current societal affairs….we all know that legally…in this day and age….a woman can rape a man…..although the courts still completely favor women…which is a massive problem as per this article….but today the definitions and laws are there at least in our western society….to make a woman raping a man a legal argument by definition of rape…..that is all…

        35. It dose seem like the same person I agree…based on their respective comments having the exact same views, tone and writing style….no matter what you write this guy/girl or whatever “it” is…his only argument will be that at worst all a woman can do to a man is sexually coerce, sexually violate, mutilate, disfigure, threaten with death, etc, etc, etc….but in his mind using the word rape to describe sexually violating a man technically doesnt ascribe to the antiquated definition of rape he uses in his argument and clearly still believes…this is despite the fact that the definition of rape has now been legally changed to include women raping me…..and yes….this change was partially brought upon us by the dreaded feminazis….so if you believe their legally accepted definition….in his eyes….you must be a blind feminist pawn yourself hahahahha…..you seem like a smart guy….dont waste any more of your time on idiots like this….your never going to get him to agree your right….

        36. You still have not seen the rape scene from “Thursday? ” here is a hint as to how wrong you are, the female rapist employs duct-tape and a loaded, cocked. 357 revolver.

        37. Good points. And I have given up on replying to the guy as it seems more and more likely that he’s a troll posting under at least 4 different accounts.

        38. Thanks for articulating so clearly that this site is a feminist fan club. Indeed, you are trying to outdo the feminists at their own game. You are so fully aligned with feminist ideology that the only objection to feminism you can come up with is that the feminist agenda hasn’t been implemented to the fullest extent yet. The irony of this site purporting to be a “men’s” forum couldn’t be starker.

        39. I haven’t seen the movie “Thursday,” but there is no way it could change my mind. I don’t deny that women can force men to have sex and I don’t deny that they can abuse men in horrible ways that deserve to be punished every bit as harshly as rape or more. What you describe would certainly be a heinous crime at least as bad as rape because for one thing, it is a threatened murder and he is reasonably fearing for his life. But it still does not fit in the category of rape. If a woman did that to me, the last thing I would be worried about was that she was having sex with me! The issue here is not being violated by a vagina. Why do you insist on defining the crime by this irrelevant aspect when it can so easily be adequately dealt with using reasonable definitions?

        40. What is it that you hope to achieve by continuing to spout your view on this matter? Do you think anyone is going to have their mind changed by your words?…or do you just want to get your view out there into the world on this site specifically? The fact is that no one here agrees with your point of view so why continue to try and refute the points of those who respond to you knowing that at best all that will be achieved is a circular debate whereby you will never agree with anything said thats contrary to your beliefs and no one here is likely to change their view on the matter and agree with what your saying….whats the point?….its like me being a republican and attending a democratic party convention with the intent of converting democrats to republicans….no one on this site is ever going to change their point of view from the fact that women can now technically and legally rape men…to….women can never rape men because the definition of rape in almost ancient texts says that the criteria for rape is impossible to meet between women and man and can only be met via a man woman scenario….that definition is long gone man…oh wait….my saying that it must mean im a feminist myself right? Hahahahahha…..your such a loser its funny….however I will say that when a retard like you posts such stupid crap I do like wasting the odd 15 minutes before putting my kids to bed having fun debating…..regardless of any of what I have said thus far…one thing I know for sure is that you are a lonesome weak bodied not wealthy happy idiot….theres absolutely no way that your remotely successful, have a rel of any kind with any member of the opposite sex and likely love these little online debates to such a degree that they encumber a huge part of your day and actually give you pleasure both mentally and physically….you love thinking to yourself “haha…I just ruined that random guys comment….im so smart and sophisticated…Im winning this game of life…yeah!”…..hahahah…….loser…..make fun of me all you want….unlike you…ive posted a mere 3 comments simply because I think your such a retard and im bored….this argument on ROK is most likely the highlight or your week…or maybe month…who knows….who cares….later loser

        41. What I hope to achieve? It isn’t about this site specifically; just general men’s rights activism. My most important reason for being so concerned with debunking the lie that women can rape men is because of the abuses against men enabled by this feminist definition of rape. There are thousands of men accused of rape for every woman, and they are the real issue. They are much easier to convict thanks to feminist expansion of rape law. Gender neutrality in rape law is an important part of the feminist agenda because it helps legitimize their rape law reforms in the minds of less intelligent men. Thanks to this clever strategy, feminists are able to turn ostensible men’s communities like this one into advocates for the feminist agenda.
          And secondarily I am offended by the intellectual dishonesty or incredible stupidity of turning an important natural category on its head. Imagine if the legal definition of murder now included giving birth, or the definition of theft or robbery now were to include giving people money against their will. Because you don’t question what legislators do and take their word as gospel, you would no doubt go along with it, but it would still be wrong. Rape is a deeply meaningful human concept defined by biology and culture, not something legislators can play around with arbitrarily. Just because the law has been perverted does not mean we should accept it. In my view, there must be good reasons for changing a law. All the reasons I have seen for reforming rape law serve feminists and hurt men, so I am astonished that you go along with it so easily. Your argument boils down to: “The law has been changed, so we must accept it.”
          Defining female sexual coercion as rape is every bit as moronic as defining unwanted gifts as robbery. Humans of both sexes instinctively know that forcibly penetrating a woman is a heinous offense against her, while our instinctive reaction to the reverse situation is laughter. They do not fit in the same category and do not deserve equal treatment. Only by denying biology and accepting the feminist lie that men and women are equal is it possible to go along with the charade that women can rape men. And by doing so, you have accepted the most important parts of feminist ideology, both in theory (gender equality) and practice (state-enforced violence against men — which is never going to change much because most men have no interest in accusing women of rape even if they are legally entitled to).

        42. Forced sexual contact is forced sexual contact regardless of the perpetrators gender

        43. How many of you PUAs and other types value yourself based on notches?
          I can assure you with 100% accuracy that none of the bitter grape geeks here are getting any pussy and certainly not with #10 rich Russian models lol
          Roosh himself couldn’t even get a Danish hooker to have sex with him. He gets all butthurt and writes a book about the Jante code hahaha

        44. He has no idea what he’s writing about as concerns the law.First of all, how many cases are there where a female held a gun to a man’s head and shoved a dildo up his arse? Even if that never was defined as rape the female could still be charged with a serious crime like aggravated battery or torture, mayhem etc that may even have harsher penalties.And stop talking about legal definitions because you’re not a lawyer or do you know your arse from your elbow. Read the actual statute in your state as applies to rape and stop with your mindless kiddycrap about what you think it is.

        45. As I said, you incels and basement pyjama boys need to get out into the real world and stop watching Hollywood bullshit films.Next you’ll be telling us about something you saw in a (fake) porn film.

      2. Agree. This one is too obvious (and ridiculous). A woman breaks into someone’s home but it’s ok (no police need to be called)…she’s just sucking dick.
        I don’t need the woman to break into my home to do it. She’s either already there because she was invited in or I gave her a key to come and go as she pleases. Either way, it was my choice (and my choice in the woman. I guess I have high standards – I swing for the fence).

      3. The guy may have reported it because he screwed his friend’s wife.
        Men can easily push some horny girl away if they want to.
        You sound like a naive inexperienced incel to me. You’re in good company here with all of the other sex starved boys.They know that they can’t get women so they now turn against them in some sort of revenge sour grapes nonsense.

    5. I also believe a woman cannot rape a man BUT if feminists want equality (being able to vote, work, etc.) THEN they need to be treated the same.
      Women cannot have their cake and eat it to. Once they lose their right to vote THEN I accept that they can’t be punished for ‘raping’ a man.

      1. Okay, let’s have a discussion, mainstream, mainline feminists believe that women can rape men. This is a fact, go to website like rationalwiki(a feminist plagued site) and they will tell you the idea that women can’t rape men is part of “rape culture”. So by definition it is a mainstream feminist position, and most mainstream feminist websites agree with that. I’m not talking about some radical feminist who believes that all men are rapists. Again this does not change the mainstream positions of people anymore than having one fascist makes your country far right or having one communist makes your country far left. Again the mean value of the American public is to believe that women can rape men, particularly among the people under fifty years old crowd.
        So there, I’ve just established that f-to-m rape is a popular opinion and a mainstream feminist position. That being the case, theredpill and manosphere should challenge this position deeply, as they would any other ridiculous concept like “rape culture” or “privilege”. Treating women the same as men in 100% of cases is exactly what feminists want. But there are a couple of problems with this, a vagina cannot rape a penis, men want to spread their seed, it is ingrained in us, low cost opportunities to spread our seed are like a godsend to us. Every porn video is a woman coming up and ripping our clothes off and then proceeding to suck/ride on our dick. That’s the most popular porn in terms of views/ratings by far. Is this rape? Far from it, we love the idea of these low effort sexual encounters. So this idea that women should be punished the same as men implies that men and women are on the same biologically equal footing and have the same goals. This is preposterous of course.
        To demonstrate this principle that something being inserted is much different than something enjoyable happening. For example imagine if you were asked to have a random woman suck/ride your dick vs. having a man forcibly shove his dick up your ass. Which one would you choose every time? I know the one I would pick, the woman every single time.
        So the idea that women should be punished the same as men, or even punished at all is quite silly. Just genuinely ask yourself have you considered women raping you to be a serious issue. Not before you were introduced to feminism. Before I was introduced to feminism I correctly saw the idea of f-to-m rape as a joke, it was only after being indoctrinated and filled with feminist propaganda did I think it was possible. About my junior year of college I was a full blown socialist (the peak of my stupidity), but after I started working and getting out more I stopped. I spent a lot of time in my room letting my left wing rage pretty much grown into a full psychological catharsis, thank god I didn’t do anything stupid though. When I started going to the gym, working out, getting better with women (as opposed to being incel when I was a fat, left-winger, nice guy), actually working and doing well, I realized I was wrong. So I started questioning a few left-wing positions and the house of cards fell, this was just one of many issues I had to challenge. The “mystery” of rape.

        1. Well written, you defiantly have a point. You should write an article on this site about this topic.

        2. You’re right, the Femtards are like the lunatic fringe and unnatural freaks suffering from mental disorders but real life is quite different.They should be laughed at or ignored and never taken seriously.Their disturbed minds can come up with insane theories where white is black and black white but normal people don’t buy any of this stuff.

      2. I think that it would be better to discredit new definitions of male on female rape and limit it to the old definition where some guy used real force or a credible threat of force before it could be considered rape.And most of this stuff you read on the Net from around the world and get excited about is extremely rare and never happens in real life.

        1. Yup, I agree with you for once.
          Rape should be considered when a made forcibly subdues a female victim, and forcible has sex with her while she is screaming for help. Not fucking drunk college sluts regretting getting fucked and then the morning after crying rape and ruining a young mans life.

  4. Didn’t even get a home invasion or trespassing charge? Bitches can just break into your house and hang out?

    1. “Hang out”?? She HAD to have plundered some items to sell for meth money on top of violating the poor sap! Of course that detail will be conveniently left out in all news coverage of the incident, because, you know, vagina.

    2. The dude could’ve nailed her for actual rape, if he could’ve brought himself to admit she fingered his bumhole whilst holding his weiner hostage in her yap.

    3. The epidemic of women breaking into houses to suck our cocks! Better shut your doors extra tight.

      1. Forget for a moment your thirst driven fantasy of some strange woman sucking your cock without your consent. Are you truly ok with breaking and entering?
        Jesus dude, go get laid, your thirst reeks of desperation.

        1. So you are ok with ALL lawlessness from women, as long as you get to revel in a thirst induced fantasy?
          You don’t see it, incel, but you and your kind are a huge part of the problem.

      2. Well, rape is always bad. Consent violations are never OK. But here’s the issue, when you make fun of a person reporting rape, especially in public, you discourage anyone who might hear you from reporting their own experience of sexual abuse. Most of these dudes sound pretty fragile to me, so while I totally see the joke you’re making, it might actually work one of these poor bastards over. I basically want to rip my eyes out reading every article on here, but since I found it via that mad max viral article I’ve had a hard time resisting, it’s hard not to want to know what kind of idiocy you’re facing. I saw your other posts so I think we might agree on some things… Anyway, just don’t sink to the level of these idiots. They’re horrible scum, but no one should suffer in silence after an assault. And rape culture is bad for everyone.

    4. They obviously knew each other so this is not the same as a total stranger doing it. There’s a little more to the story than you get in the media and men getting raped by females is almost unheard of.

  5. Prisons are for men. Literally. They’re not intended for women. Now that we don’t have as many wars, fewer accidents and diseases to reduce the male population, we need prisons more than ever.
    It’s always, since before modern humans existed, been one of the top priorities of men in power to kill off a decent chunk of the male population. It’s a lack of competition for mates, resources, and reduces the threat of insurrection.

    1. I don’t know how they can square the prison imbalance with the idea of equality. Surely there isn’t a connexion between equality and hypocrisy?

    2. Prison is, and should be, for those who break the law. Should we allow female murderers to continue engaging in a killing rampage without consequences?

      1. An important distinction should be made here. Prison should be for those who are dangerous to others, or to society.
        The earlier statement implies that laws = justice. By that rationale the imprisoning of all the Asians in California in the 1940s was a good, just, and right thing.

        1. Fantastic observation. In fact it was the meta theme of Les Miserables (the book, not the Hollywood distortion).

        2. “The earlier statement implies that laws = justice.”
          The above is not my position. However, rereading my original previous statement the reaction is understandable. It was written in great haste and obviously quite carelessly. Couple this with no sleep for virtually 24 hours and one has a recipe for serious errors.
          Your clarification was necessary. Thank you.

        3. Just the Japs and 1/2 of them were not US citizens. That’s what happens during wars where enemy people are interned and their property confiscated. Besides I believe that they were moved away from the coast to prevent spies from signalling enemy Jap ships and that they could be relocated inland.

  6. Meanwhile is oh-so-cool South Africa…
    Man raped at gunpoint by three women
    https://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2015/05/12/man-raped-at-gunpoint-by-three-women/
    The women drove the man 500 kilometers (about 311 miles) to a location where they attempted to rape him. When they could not get him aroused, they forced the man to drink a concoction that induced an erection. They repeatedly raped the man, collecting his semen and storing it in a cooler after each ejaculation.
    The report states that these incidents are becoming more common. Similar crimes occurred in Johannesburg and Gauteng. Police have yet to arrest anyone for the crimes. It is possible that the assaults stem from an attempt to use the semen as part of traditional medicine:
    I wonder why this wasn’t on TV…

    1. What’s “oh-so-cool” about that shitpit? AIDS? Rampant crime? The lawlessness and corruption?

    2. I suppose some incredibly shallow women would think accents from there are cool and sexy, sure.

    3. yeah, we need an article on that. fucking witchcraft. they also collect penises. maybe the earlier christians did have a point.

    4. Oops, I seriously actually posted a scenario like this a few months ago on the fat broad article comments, hope I didn’t give someone ideas 😮

    5. This isn’t on TV or reported by the news because it doesn’t involve the right “players”.
      Reverse roles in this situation with a woman raped at gunpoint by three men …and you have a top news story by all outlets.

    1. I am amazed at the number of Boondock video clips I’ve seen in such a short time of being on this site. Is this considered required viewing when a man decides to take the red pill?

    2. I am amazed at the number of Boondock video clips I’ve seen in such a short time of being on this site. Is this considered required viewing when a man decides to take the red pill?

  7. Look Feminist, look at that male, white, heterosexual privilege.
    Oh wait, nevermind.

    1. As a white, straight, male, where can I sign up for this program of surprise morning head?

    2. Agree. That equality thing is working out great.
      MSM – man is the victim, nothing to report.
      MSM – woman is the victim (especially a white one), top story of the day.

  8. What the fuck, that first picture is just gross and sad to look at. How the hell can someone let themselves get that damn big?

        1. Too much genetics to eat? Sucked those super-fattening genetics right out of the nadbag?
          Strange, most landwhales tend to drink the diet cola beverages – there’s the problem.

        2. Well it does run in families where the females all have that same look. Sometimes one of the sisters will be slim but she was eating the same stuff growing up as the others so apparently it’s how the genes combined that made her different.All of this is not an exact science and we don’t know why some people just get fat. It’s not just as simple as calories.But even in cases where you can say it’s calories why do they have a compulsion to stuff themselves like an alcoholic that just keeps drinking and their brain just doesn’t turn it off at a certain point of satiety. Regardless of whether its from stuffing yourself or just that everything you eat turns to fat there has to be a genetic component that either directly causes fatness or makes a person predisposed to fatness. You can probably slim down most fat girls but they are going to have to look at fatness as a disease that must always be monitored like a diabetic has to.

    1. Sitt around an do fuck all exercise an eat junk food all day an drink copious amounts of soft drink while watching shows like Oprah that tell you that even though you weigh 500kgs+ you’re beautiful.

  9. Wonder what a female actually has to do to a male to get convicted of a sex crime an get a real sentence in The West?

    1. She can start with actually committing a coherent, logical crime. Riding/sucking some dude’s dick is not sufficient reasoning, it’s laughable reasoning.

      1. You seem to insist on missing the point.
        Your neighbor, male, breaks into your home and starts munching your wife’s vajayjay while she was sleeping, and you’d be ok with that? Yes? Then you are into being cuckholded. No? Welcome to equality.

      2. Give me your address. You’ll shit your liberal panties when I break into your house.

    2. Hell, women get a lesser sentence – regardless of the crime.
      It’s another example of how women are treated equally but only under certain conditions. It’s selective equality.

  10. If the state doesn’t charge them equally then they don’t see woman as equals but pushing the perception to their own advantage. It amounts to psychological warfare against male citizens.

  11. It can also backfire on women to the point where a drunk woman at the beach on spring break will get gang banged by four men while 100 bystanders move on because no one was sure she didn’t give them her consent. Why, you might even be accused of racism for stopping those poor men from having fun.
    Her body, her choice. No white knights to the rescue.

    1. “It can also backfire on women to the point where a drunk woman at the
      beach on spring break will get gang banged by four men while 100
      bystanders move… Why, you might even be accused of racism for stopping those poor men from having fun.”
      That happens right now. Black skin > vagina. There’s been half a century of mandatory reading of To Kill A Mockingbird for a reason.
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/04/12/two-college-students-accused-of-sexually-assaulting-woman-as-hundreds-allegedly-watched/
      Reverse the skin colors in just one event like the above rape or the below mob assault and the media, the government, the education system, and SJWs would still be talking about it decades from now.
      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-12/face-baltimore-you-wont-see-news

    2. Only in today’s world among the dumb proles and where negroes are accepted and everyone is afraid to say anything.Now, I’d never in a gazillion years be around a beach like this but if I saw this happening I’d take a closer look and do something.A few nogs screwing some white girl to me doesn’t look like consensual sex and in fact the girl apparently had too much to drink and was practically unconscious and sleeping it off in a beach chair.Just the fact that it was in public I would tell them to stop at once and when they took a look at my dog who’s always with me their dicks would be deflated real fast cos he’s getting nervous and starting to growl now :o) He’s a white dog.

  12. So is this what feminism looks like?
    Or traditionalism?
    Lizzie Borden hacked her folks up with a hatchet and basically got on with her life afterwards. The pussy pass is an old American tradition.

    1. Reminds me of that crazy asian bitch that cut her husbands genitals off and threw it into the grinder than all the women got together and laughed about it.

  13. As if though coming to this site wasn’t discouraging enough, I now realize i’m a rapist =[. I used to wake my ex-boyfriend up with a blowjob when he was extra sweet to me, and I usually started while he was still asleep. =[

  14. As if though coming to this site wasn’t discouraging enough, I now realize i’m a rapist =[. I used to wake my ex-boyfriend up with a blowjob when he was extra sweet to me, and I usually started while he was still asleep. =[

    1. You terrible harlot, you have “triggered” me without warning, you “rapey creep”!

    2. Please keep giving your boyfriend head in the morning. The men on this site must be homosexuals who fear nothing more than morning sex and surprise head.

      1. By somebody who breaks into your home…you’re into that kind of thing then?

        1. Forget all of the obvious crimes involved, those will get thrown out of court as well.
          Here is the dangerous part with the courts giving women the “pussy pass”. If the law isn’t going to treat all crimes (and cases) equally, then it’s useless. More people will start “policing” their own area, property, etc..since the law (courts) seem to be failing us (men).

        2. That’s actually a desirable outcome if you ask me. The State should have never come to be the mediator for our every problem. A person breaks into your home then the age old common law self defense belief kicks in.
          Also of importance, when the law fails at an institutional level, there’s no point in bothering to moderate your responses, which you allude to. A real life example is the oft repeated meme in the gun community that if the government is going to outlaw all or most firearms then what’s the point of not converting some of your heaters to full auto? What are they going to do, kill you twice?

        3. Yep. The problem being that (as a nation) we’ve exchanged our security for our freedom. The Patriot Act was one of the most obvious (not the first) examples.
          I can only speak for myself. I know around my house it’s old school law. If you’re in the house without permission, then it’s fire, first, then ask questions.

  15. When I saw the mug shot I wondered what Clay Matthews had done to get arrested.

  16. When I saw the mug shot I wondered what Clay Matthews had done to get arrested.

  17. Well now, did the lazy bitch have so much the consideration to make the man breakfast afterwards? HMMMM? I personally disagree with the MRA angle of going tit for tat. It’s the system pharisaical hacks, the sjw’s, the elitist shit that underwrites and abrogates policy against plebe families and unions – THEY’RE THE ONES we need to deafen with our war cry. They’re the source of the problem. We must be relentless and merciless with THEM. The silly bff girl is only a side show.

  18. Well now, did the lazy bitch have so much the consideration to make the man breakfast afterwards? HMMMM? I personally disagree with the MRA angle of going tit for tat. It’s the system pharisaical hacks, the sjw’s, the elitist shit that underwrites and abrogates policy against plebe families and unions – THEY’RE THE ONES we need to deafen with our war cry. They’re the source of the problem. We must be relentless and merciless with THEM. The silly bff girl is only a side show.

    1. I posted this yesterday.. I agree with most of what he’s saying. MRA is a clusterfuck.

      1. It won’t succeed as long as buys into the myth that women can rape men. People around the world see how horseshit it is.

        1. you seem overly obssesed with the concept that women can’t rape men. Despite the fact most campus rape claims on men are equally dubious, at best, and preclude consensual settings where consent was later retracted unbeknownst to the guy involved.
          Your fixation of such prevents you from seeing the bigger picture. I pity you

        2. The bigger picture is that men are not the same as women psychologically, biologically, and in every other way. Men are closer to male chimps than they are to women, I would rather let male chimps vote than women as well. The picture your missing is you are broad-stroking feminist “equality” even when it gets to the point of lunacy.

    2. I believe it’s a two pronged attack, you have to attack both. Let’s face it, it’s other men (too) that are the problem here (continuing to let this shit go on and on). I can’t stand white knights (men) and that’s who we need to hit as well. Women are just adult children….you can’t take them seriously because of “feelings”.

      1. Yet you take the feminist definition of rape as serious and don’t toss it away as childish, moronic, and destructive.

        1. The State and the Media do not care if Driver takes it as serious or not.
          however, THEY do take the feminist definition of rape as serious. how else was YMY and other draconian laws passed?
          You carry the stench of troll about you

    3. That’s right! Put some dead rabbits or a cabbage on a pole and get out there and demonstrate.Be merciless haha

  19. Just like the police brutality cases in the U.S., you could spend an entire week browsing the net non-stop for incident after incident of countless double standards and complete absence of justice where an American woman walks away free despite assaulting, slandering, sexually harassing, injuring, mutilating or even outright killing a man, and you wouldn’t have even covered one tenth of the examples…
    The obvious question then becomes, what other proof or atrocity or total catastrophe are the American men waiting for before they finally think they have had enough with this unbelievably corrupt and oppressive state of affairs ??? I’m surprised every day that the entire American continent hasn’t yet gone up in flames like Baltimore…

  20. Just like the police brutality cases in the U.S., you could spend an entire week browsing the net non-stop for incident after incident of countless double standards and complete absence of justice where an American woman walks away free despite assaulting, slandering, sexually harassing, injuring, mutilating or even outright killing a man, and you wouldn’t have even covered one tenth of the examples…
    The obvious question then becomes, what other proof or atrocity or total catastrophe are the American men waiting for before they finally think they have had enough with this unbelievably corrupt and oppressive state of affairs ??? I’m surprised every day that the entire American continent hasn’t yet gone up in flames like Baltimore…

    1. You’re living in your own little underclass world because none of this stuff happens to men of substance in real life.
      And no, ghetto thugs who bounce some ball around in a little boy’s game, actors and media entertainers or some slug who won the lottery playing his welfare money are not men of substance. These guys get screwed just like you underclass boys.

      1. you pathetic delusional troll, I’ll educate you a bit for the benefit of the readership of this website:
        This stuff doesn’t happen in masculine societies, which are on their way to take over America as the dominant civilization of the world. Where you and your mostly castrated countrymen come from, not even Elon Musk the renaissance man is immune to psychotic concepts like out of wedlock child support, cohabiting spousal support, no fault divorce, men losing their jobs and fortunes over telling a lewd joke or unsubstantiated charges of sexual harassment or domestic abuse etc. etc. etc there is no limit to misandric travesties in the corrupt police state called the USA. Get out of your parents’ basement before aimlessly trolling around…

  21. It’s interesting to see how fast the MSM jumps on any story relating to a man but has no interest in the many stories involving women (same crime). Megan Rae Davis is another example of women wanting to be treated equal (but only when it benefits them).
    Men need to be put on notice….the courts and this government are against you.
    The courts continue to show their favoritism (to women) while they gladly throw a man in jail (with less evidence).

  22. Somehow, I don’t think this will be used as an example of the need for Texas to adopt “yes means yes” (YMY). Let’s just set aside the trespass/break-and-enter consider that she wrapped her legs around him and started fellating him. We don’t have any indication of what the guy said or did at this point. However, under YMY he could lay back and enjoy and she would still be guilty of sexual assault. That is, if the law actually meant anything other than being a way for women to control men.
    .
    The further lunacy of YMY is with ongoing affirmation and the presumption that any previous activity is irrelevant. Wake up in the morning with your arms around them: cop a feel, GUILTY; kiss good morning, GUILTY. That is, of course, if she complains: if she does and you tell the truth, GUILTY! YMY also effectively criminalizes “escalation”.

    1. YMY is just like prohibition. The law only has teeth when there are snitches. During prohibition, the bitches who started it were the snitches and the beta whip men who aided in the enforcement WERE THE SAME people that cower behind the state in today’s set of ‘bitch laws’. These kind of laws DRAW OUT the enemy. People who would never be decent and would never be your allies if ever tested. It marks them permanantly as hostile, so never forget their faces and spread their rap sheet so as to protect innocents. Most people have been burned at one time or another by pro statist neighbors, family members, co workers and if there were only forewarning about these folks, much damage could be avoided. It’s up to all good men to enforce apartheid with the anti male/pro state foes. Never hesitate to call out a questionable individual. If he can renounce the shit talk about him, then he can prove himself clean. There are just too many anti family, anti liberty state snitches out there these days. We have to keep the streets safe for our kids and the kid’s daddies, our patriarch bro’s, safe from being ambushed by individuals or state agents.

  23. So the husband’s friend was the one who reported her?
    That’s a fucking bro right there.

    1. He shouldn’t have called the pigs. No, the right thing to do is to REPORT HER to her master. Tell on her. Squeal big time. Rat her out to the man and tell him he needs to put a leash on his woman. It’s always best to keep issues resolved between the bro’s. Same with domestic disputes. If the woman wants to call in the ‘laah’ (law), then the bitch needs a major overhaul along with a haircut.
      So many people ignorantly say ”but . . but . . we’re a society of ‘LAAAH’ aren’t we? (like a sheep’s ‘baah’). Well here’s news for them: NO WE’RE NOT a society of ‘laah’ and never have been. WHAT WE ARE is a people MENACED by aggressive bureaucrat parasites and SELECTIVELY ENFORCED ‘laaaaaah’. So you can tell all the legalistic doinksters to SHOVE IT! 🙂

      1. That’s what being lower class is like and you should know it. Only low grade females would even think of getting the blue collar cops involved in personal matters.It just isn’t done.

  24. You ever been at your boy’s house in sweatpants watching the game then all of sudden your dick gets hard and bulges out your pants, then your friend gives you that seductive look like he want to suck some dick so you just let em do it ???

    1. Knowing this site being full of closeted homosexuals who fear nothing more than morning sex and surprise head with women, they should be lining up.

    2. haha Yes 9 out of 10 of these geeks are homos.Or soon will be because even whores won’t let them fuck them. They have standards too and just don’t go with anyone.I’m not joking about that. You need game and looks to even go with a whore even though you may give her money.

  25. I would be inclined to believe this kind of thing may actually happen more often in Texas, since a traditional conservative mindset leaves one ill prepared to deal with the legal climate.
    There is nothing more detrimental to a group of peoples well being than to assume that they are beyond reproach. You can see the toxic effects of this just by viewing the behavior of hood rats and women in this country. No character whatsoever.

  26. “Glory of the technological age” HA
    Don’t try to put favor on advancement of technology when it’s the opposite. Women that read this article will be acknowledged about what they can get away with. This article would empower them and not shmae them. Manginas and betas would read this like some porno and get off on it after all most internet usage falls over finding ways to get off via social media or pornography.

  27. Isn’t sexual deviancy illegal in the presence of a marriage contract? Have there been no ramifications regarding this?
    I’m not surprised that a person can behave like this – but it’s another serious breach of the contract and implied trust the Judicial system has with society that really does the wider damage.
    Guy this happened to must have been absolutely fuming with the Judgecunt behind this mockery.
    I wonder if he’ll be rushing to pay their wages with his tax $’s.

  28. So George Carlin was wrong? Somebody actually did shout “Hey, stop sucking my dick!”?

  29. You can beat a man for talking shit. You can beat your brother up for talking shit against you. You can beat your child for doing something they shouldn’t and they don’t know better. But you can’t beat your wife if she talks shit and she does something wrong when she should no better. This country started going down the drain once the outlawed beating your wife. Because it was only a matter of time once you take away the right to beat your wife that women would take over. They are mass manipulators.

    1. Men of substance do whatever they want. It’s only you poor stumblebums that have to obey but then there’s almost everything that you can’t do. That’s life. Justice is not blind and the DA’s, courts, jurors pretty much judge you based on class. You losers can’t accept that’s how the world is because you’re at the bottom and cry wah wah that’s unfair boo hoo hoo. You’re living in a box, or close to it, stealing food from fat girls refrigerators and in your deluded minds think you’re going to get the same respect as a man of quality. Justice is not blind and in fact the statue at the Old Bailey is not blind folded.
      http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=old+bailey+statue+justice&view=detailv2&&qpvt=old+bailey+statue+justice&id=14F52E533640643855E7B21AF0379F9E86D1A8CB&selectedIndex=5&ccid=p5fYo1H%2f&simid=607988050498946309&thid=JN.lx5sGa5dDcO2WWPcTw58Kg&ajaxhist=0

  30. Our legal system is so perverted that essentially a fat deranged woman can enter a high value man’s house (NFL, NBA player, actor, any rich man), drug him, almost suffocate him with her sweaty pussy, then ride his dick until completion and then 9 months later sue him for child-support. She would get a slap on the wrist legally while he gets several decades of financial extortion. I wonder why not more women are doing that.

  31. Pin the story up for quick reference when another online feminist whore cries rape

  32. Now THAT’S what I call an alarm clock for the man who has everything. I’d tell her to set her ass for 6a.m. SHARP tomorrow morning!!

    1. He could charge her with that but I doubt if the DA would proceed or get an indictment. he got none in this case and I’m sure there were men on the grand jury.

  33. This woman, if she in fact did the things she is accused of, is a FUCKING RAPIST. And this is, without question, an example of a fucked up double standard. But you have to ask yourselves guys, who exactly is perpetuating that double standard? The reason people don’t think women can rape men is that cultural contributors like this very website perpetuate the bullshit idea that men are always the instigators of sexual encounters. Don’t believe me? Check out this fine piece of shit article, which describes men desperately seeking sex, as overly ’empowered’ women withhold it.

    The Equality Movement Is Allowing Women To Tyrannize Men


    Honestly guys, what’s hilarious about this, is that truly empowered women have as much sex as they want with consenting partners, and just because they’re not interested in you, doesn’t mean they’re tyrannical or lacking in sex drive, it just means you’re unattractive. I assure you, that the one group of people that would without question support the victim of this crime, is feminists. Because gender based double standards aren’t feminist. We’re all trying to come up together, try and get that, ok?

    1. in the UK feminists had the legal system change the law describing rape so a woman having heterosexual sex with a man without his consent no longer qualifies.
      In the USA a feminist had the way the FBI defined rape in their reports so a woman having heterosexual sex with a man without his consent no longer qualifies.
      fuck you and your bullshit claims about feminists and feminism.

      1. That’s because a female ‘raping’ a man is so rare that no one ever thinks of it. Besides, a female can just pick up some loser, like one of the sexless ‘kings’ and get him to fuck her regardless of how fat or skanky she is.
        Stop with the FBI bullshit because it was Never viewed under the law that a female could rape a man.A man could just push her away and if he was unconscious his dick would be limp while a drugged female can still be fucked.

        1. “That’s because a female ‘raping’ a man is so rare that no one ever thinks of it.”
          1. It is rare because it goes unreported so much and is never discussed.
          “Besides, a female can just pick up some loser, like one of the sexless
          ‘kings’ and get him to fuck her regardless of how fat or skanky she is.”
          2. And a guy can go and pick up some fat ugly loser female or buy a whore.
          “Stop with the FBI bullshit because it was Never viewed under the law that a female could rape a man.”
          3. The NIBRS in the USA classed rape as:
          “The carnal knowledge of a person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of his/her age or because of his/her temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity”
          4. “A man could just push her away”
          A woman can struggle and cross her legs to avoid being raped using that reasoning.
          5. “And if he was unconscious his dick would be limp while a drugged female can still be fucked.”
          You are claiming that unconscious men cannot get erections, if so i suggest you see a doctor as i wake up with boners all the time.
          There is also the matter of giving “VALID CONSENT” because it is well accepted that a drunk woman cannot give valid consent even if she says she wants sex while drunk.
          As such in a fair and equal society a man as drunk cannot give valid consent either.

        1. The offense of rape is created by section 1 of the Sexual Offenses Act 2003:
          “1-(1) A person (A) commits an offense if—
          (a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
          (2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard
          to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain
          whether B consents.
          (3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offense under this section.
          (4) A person guilty of an offense under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.”
          Notice the word “HE” and “with his penis”.
          As such a woman “enveloping” a man against his will is not considered rape in the UK and the only way a woman can be convicted of rape is if she is a accomplice to a act that is considered rape (she has to help a man rape somebody).
          The law is easy to check on but here is a link to a paper on gender neutral rape laws, it also points out feminists and feminist actions to prevent gender neutral rape laws.
          http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/14750/1/RumneySJSJ.pdf
          The NIBRS in the USA classes rape as:
          “The carnal knowledge of a person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of his/her age or because of his/her temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity”
          But the new UCR reports “rape” as:
          “Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”
          As such “envelopment” is not classed as rape in the FBI’s UCR.
          ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE RAPE OF MEN BY WOMEN IN THE UK.
          In the UK like the USA a lot of people talk about “consent” and how a person who is drunk cannot give valid consent but typically “person” means “woman.
          This is highlighted by the fact that in the UK there is a term known as “brewers droop” that is used to describe a man who is so drunk he cannot get a erection.
          It is a derogatory term used to portray such a man as being less than a real man.
          NO THOUGHT is given to that mans inability to consent due to his drunkenness only his ability to perform is questioned and he is verbally humiliated if he is unable to perform.
          Now we hear a lot about this supposed rape culture but i do not see women being treated like this.
          Just imagine for a second that a womans body was effected by excessive drink similarly to a mans and her vagina closed up and dried up to a point she could not have sex. Imagine living in a society that had a derogatory term like say “brewers drought” to describe it and saw her as less than a “real woman” because of it.
          Now THAT would be a rape culture.
          In the UK the term “

        2. So far, this has been the only reply founded on logic and reality that i have received since my arrival on this website. I am from the US, not the UK, so I cannot claim to understand the particularities of the UK’s sexual assault laws. If what you’re describing is accurate, than I am appalled. I would like you to know, that no feminist from my camp (fourth wave US feminism), would support these absurd and offensive laws. While unjust laws in the UK do not justify rape culture in the US, they are without question equally offensive, and should be altered. Rape is not gendered, and it is aways a tragedy. No matter the sex of the victim, or the perpetrator.

        3. But in the US there are adult men being forced to pay child support to the women who raped them while they were minors and got pregnant from it.
          http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/
          How often in the USA and UK do we hear about how a intoxicated person not being able to give valid consent yet only see it applied to women.
          If a man and woman are EQUALLY drunk and both give consent the perception is that she is the victim due to being drunk and he is a rapist and likely a aggravated one due to being drunk if they have sex.
          Think about frat parties and how drunk the guys are typically at one, using feminists rules about consent and applying them equally how many female students are rapists for having sex with those guys?
          Rape is gendered by perception, by precedent and by attitudes and the authorities and courts act accordingly.
          Here is a great video about “open carry laws” that like “rape laws” are supposedly the same for everybody.
          1. White guy walking with a AR-15 on his back.
          2. Black guy walking with a AR-15 on his back.
          Same area, same laws, same gun etc but look at how each is treated and you will get some idea about the issue with rape and being a man or woman.

  34. men have a point about unequal justice but I would be pretty happy if this happened to me. Admittedly, I’d mostly be afraid, cause I might be wondering what a woman this crazy might be capable of. and just how sharp her teeth are. But I see no harm was done . . .

  35. Let’s face it. Many of these women who sit on Grand Juries or in positions of power will look at an issue like this, giggle, blush, likely get turned on a bit, and then say to themselves: “he probably feels sooooooo lucky right now. He got to cheat and can’t be blamed!”
    … and the guy is walking away saying: “Well that’s great…. some skank breaks into my house, exposes me to STDs (possibly), creates a situation where I may lose my current relationship because who the fuck is going to believe this, and… ohhhh…… of course I was sexually assaulted while sleeping. Gee wiz, now I can’t feel safe in my home, my current girl won’t wrap her lips around my dick because all she see’s is that walking forehead which will undoubtedly lead to a breakup and me losing half of my income/property and having to leave my own home, my pee burns like fire, and I will forever be known as the guy who reported a blowjob that nobody took seriously.”
    Isn’t justice blind? I guess not. If the script was reversed the guy would be getting ass dominated by Bubba this very moment. Way to look at the whole picture……

  36. Except women who accuse men, often the men get away with it too, because rape kits cost an arm and a leg, and without any physical proof men get away with it. Also women sometimes feel so ashamed of being raped half of the time they do not report it, because they are scared the man will kill them or rape them again. You all are fucking idiots, and I now know why women fear our gender.

  37. It gets worse, female child pedophiles dont get sentences anywhere near as bad as male pedophiles. Wont be long before this scum is let off without punishment.

  38. Raping a woman also probably doesn’t get you indicted as the majority are not reported, only 7% lead to an arrest, and less than half of those are prosecuted.
    But yeah, I’d rather talk about fat chicks and the Boondocks too.

  39. Orally raping is the least of our problems as men in our double standard society…..how about what happens on men in society everyday? Who’s fighting for these issues? No one is because that’s the way our society is trained. Men face the worse end of it in the U.S. also, but no one speaks up, there’re no organizations that fights for Men’s rights similar to the feminists organizations who fight for more than equal rights….here’re some examples of what I mean and it’s only a few, I can write a book on this topic if I cared to:
    I’ll post this again to show that society has double standards all around. Men should start fighting for their rights as well, since these double standards seems perfect to all feminists who helped implement them. What equal rights? Men do not have it better or easier. In the U.S. issues for men are just as bad, if anything worse. Here are some double standards that are overlooked and considered normal here.
    The Medical Field in general, statistically they say that men don’t go get check up as much as women, yet no one knows why or claim that they do not. Well ask any male and you’ll find out why. In the U.S. men are left on display for everyone to see, and it’s the norm here. Even in situations where there’s no reason to be exposed, they will if you’re a male. Most of the medical workers are female and they tend to cover up the female body right away. Men they leave naked (completely undressed) even if there’s no need, especially if you’re unconscious when you get to the ER. Most men just follow along because they don’t even know the basic HIPAA laws that hospitals don’t care about this when it comes to male privacy as well. The comparable would be a female exposed with legs wide open spread eagle….that’s the equivalent if you want to compare it to a male being exposed.
    Another one are female sports reporters being able to go into the men’s locker room even while athletes are completely naked. Their reasoning is that they’re being discriminated against due to being female and it’s unfair. The feminists movement fought for this and somehow got it to past legislature. Where are the male activists to fight against this? We have no one fighting for men’s rights, so things like this happens. Again the equivalent of this would be male reporters in the female athletes locker room while they’re spread open for all to see…..that’s the only comparison. See how ridiculous that sounds, that’s because it is, but yet it’s accepted as a norm for men to go through that, but not women. Also male athletes are the pinnacle of male society, not the same for women…..so really the equivalent would be the a male reporter inside the locker room of miss universe or other pageants while they were naked and spread…..think about that. Male reporters are not even allowed in the lockers rooms while the female athlete’s are undressed, let alone legs spread apart…..so why are female reporters allowed in locker rooms while men are naked and on full display? This should be illegal, and if not, then let the men inside when the female athlete’s are naked….then and only then it would be “equal”
    Another one in the U.S. is male circumcision. The main reason given is that left uncircumcised, men are more prone to infections and such, and it’s unclean. We all know that a vagina is a lot more “unclean” than a penis, why are women not subjected to parts being cut off? Another ridiculous feminist idea that everyone just accepted. Less than 5% of the U.S. are of the religions where this practice is a tradition, so why is the circumcision rated around 80%. The ironic part about this is that women are voluntarily cutting their vaginas themselves because when they get older or if it’s to “ugly” they want the option to make it look better. Look up vaginal rejuvenation, or Vaginoplasty and Labiaplasty. So women make this choice by themselves, but they took it away from men, they make that choice for men also. How fucking boldface is that?
    All of this will change in time as later generations would see how backward thinking the people of our time were and they’ll look back in disbelief. An example of that in current day is now we look back at the days when men were only allowed to swim if they were naked or nude while women were fully clothed. Seems unreal but it’s true. Now a man would go against swimming naked, because it’s unheard of today. Isn’t being forced to swim naked in front of the opposite gender backward, wrong an invasion of your human rights? Which one of you all would do that now in front of women who’re fully clothed? So why are men not fighting for their rights in the medical environment or in the locker rooms. Male modesty is out there but the feminists only fight to take it away. They don’t fight for equal rights, they fight for more.
    Time changes everything, and the double standards that we see today will change as well. Later generations will look back and wonder what was wrong with ours. We’ll be labeled as a backward civilization just as how we look back and label past civilizations as such, and they’ll be right to say that.

Comments are closed.