8 Ways You Have Been Psychologically Severed Through Harmful Conditioning

It has been pointed out repeatedly on ROK how much millennials lack the ability to create or sustain relationships. Women glued to their phones and men addicted to video games, people exploiting each other for attention or validation or money, thin relationships that quickly wear out: the West today has a “together alone” vibe. Even worse, many compensate for this strangely shared loneliness by virtue-signaling and trying hard to be hip or mainstream, which usually implies reinforcing their own blue-pill conditioning and contributing evermore to this poisonous atmosphere.

How did the West turn like this? We already know some of the causes. We know it is hugely related to the massive attack on family, commitment, masculinity, to the West-bashing, relentless SJWing, to a general policy of “deconstructing” traditional social structures through massive influence peddling. Universities, Hollywood, the mainstream media, the corporations and many others imposed it to us. The iron fist of destructive, hateful globalism coerced us through the velvet glove of “progress”, “social justice” and so on. As a result, the millennial generation is likely the most autistic one ever.

Lucien Cerise, a French writer with a Ph.D in philosophy, has been enthralled during his youth by some of the elite’s projects, especially transhumanism. Eventually he saw how nightmarish the world would become if said elite managed to win. He spent years studying its ways before voicing his first criticisms. Here are some of the means globalists, according to Cerise, used for decades to control our “cognitive processes” and confine us into a world of biased appearances and remote-controlled judgments.

Being invisible

The most efficient power is the one you won’t notice. Whether it is considered trivial, poses as inoffensive or clownish, is protected by a taboo or uses hired faces, the best power is the one who managed to avoid unwanted attention. Father of cybernetics Norbert Wiener theorized how to pound social groups with propaganda—previously theorized by Edward Bernays—while avoiding backlashes, along with Arturo Rosenblueth and others, in the 1950s. But what is acting on others, sometimes harming them decisively, without facing any consequences if not impunity?

An age-old way not to face a backlash is redirecting it to someone else. As Hervé Ryssen pointed out, the mainstream culture talked without taboo about the Italian mafia or Irish gangsters, just like it repeatedly blamed Stalin for the dozens of millions of people murdered in USSR… without mentioning political commissars there or other Mafiosi in America. Scorsese’s movies on the Italian or Irish mafia contribute to put the whole blame on someone else.

And here it comes again, although to a lesser extent, when blue pills babble on how “millennials killed relationships” or “nice guys are not communicative enough”… well, perhaps, but why? Who conditioned, nay, who caused millennials to behave this way? When it comes to us, leftists forget all the disingenuous environmentalist explanations they noisily invoke to forgive black crime. Suddenly people shift from being pure products of their environment to super beings with a complete agency over everything they do.

Power invisibility can be achieved in a subtler way by taking up seemingly innocuous or trustworthy social roles: a non-political technocrat, a creative marketer, an artist, a care worker, even a nun can all be means or masks to push for “change.”

1. Blurring the difference between make-believe and objective truth

New-agey make-believe, marketing, narrative-pushing movies, social constructionism or “whatever I point fingers at is a social construction”, you-go-girlism, philosophies of history from Marxism to pushing for “hope” or “change” or “we live in The Current Year so immigrant invasion cannot be an invasion anymore” have all contributed to blurry the difference between fiction and reality. I strongly suspect modern urban life to contribute cutting us from nature and making us used to life into a completely artificial world where touting mere appearances is much easier.

Mindless fashion cycles, media dependence, the ever growing denial of biology in favor of an “I am what I want to be”—or what the media and group tell me it is “cool” to be—, all seemingly happening by themselves as if a kind of historical necessity, were instrumental into turning even grown adults into a psychological and social silly putty.

2. Injecting a well-crafted mind virus to impair cognition

The brain or subconscious works by distinguishing, categorizing, and classifying objects. We also need to imitate other people to learn: even an adult, if he enters into a new field, must observe what the established experts do to learn how things are done there.

Well, what about preventing all this? Let’s say distinction is “discrimination”; categorization is “racist” and “oppressive”; classifying, as it implies hierarchizing, is “judgmental”; imitation is “reactionary”, “not creative” and stupid. Do not imitate the others! Children should learn all by themselves, parents should not “repress” them! As a result, children become petulant, unruly, autistic or hyperactive whereas their parents struggle with contrived moral dilemmas out of fear of being this and that. How can you choose a path, an associate, a potential mate over another if you cannot “discriminate”?

3. Fostering intolerance to the “authoritarian personality”

Although the Horkheimers and Adornos would value very much authority among themselves, their “classic” The Authoritarian Personality was a milestone of Leftist onslaught. It jumbled together and blamed Christianity, patience, normal families headed by a father, a purported lack of hedonism, anti-Semitism and “homophobia.” Identified with “fascism”, the traditional pater familias was to take the blame. Men should not set frames or take family decisions anymore: men should pursue sex, seek a mysterious “liberation” and of course contribute to “change.”

Authority still exists, of course. It has either become subtler, acting through seduction and perceived charisma, or was reverted so that “minorities” and SJWs can wield it over the hapless masses. Yet the old-fashioned boss, the domineering father, are thoroughly demonized—up to the point where some want to forbid any corporal punishment and foster a pseudo-friendship between parents and children. Lacking the lessons from authority, boys are thrown into the world without knowing how to pick up, make themselves respected or handle threats whereas girls carry their narcissism around.

4. Destroying the distinction between familiars and foreigners

All world citizens, all anonymous and replaceable, all strangers

The distinction between familiar and foreigner is but a keystone of human relationships. People have thicker, more trustworthy relationships between family members. Likewise, a close friend whom you knew for years is more likely to tell you the truth or repay what he owes you, and it should be normal that foreigners are to be put to the test and rejected if they choose to harm us.

Well, these normal categories have been destroyed through “antiracism”, “tolerance”, “help refugees” and so on. Some say the endgame of this all is the destruction of all otherness. Everyone shall melt into the Brave New World! Of course, the lack of clear or firm references only fosters anomie, when related people start acting as antagonists towards each other whereas hostile strangers are welcomed with open arms. As millions of whites rejected the brainwashing, the System started to otherize them. Now “fascists” and “right-wingers” are the new Other. Not only are we deemed more foreign than foreigners, but our very existence is deemed intolerable.

“Humanism” is nothing else than a ploy to de-humanize those who won’t follow.

5. Fostering new conflicts

“A group of happy Black people? Can’t be! Let me organize them!”

All “minorities” are inventions wholly created to gang against Whitey. Different people, who went along together, were antagonized by narratives of “oppression”, purported past wrongs, and encouraged to follow their newly discovered identity. Thus a centrifugal movement, made of contradictory desires, revenge-seeking, leads everyone farer from each other. This is controlled dialectics.

Isn’t that strange that they promote “creativity”, “self-expression”, i.e. smaller tribalism and individualism, at the same time than the one-world dream? These trends are clearly contradictory. Unless the first is but a means towards the second. Once again—destroy and rebuild.

6. Exacerbating differences that split

Gangsta culture, LGBTism as a shining example of freer, cooler individuals, Muslims as spiritual and oppressed exotics, white cucks doubling down on attacking their own kin as to virtue-signal. Imploded into widely different and potentially antagonist subcultures, society has let room for communities. Common sense, common understanding, a shared sense of norms and belonging have been well eroded. Civilization has exploded. Only its infrastructure remains.

If the Left was not bound by its hatred against us and dependent from the System, its hive would have imploded long ago.

7. Construing new norms on the ruins of the normal

Among hippie-like students as inside families, the lack of norms leads to a string of problems: substance abuse, immediate gratification-seeking, a lack of tolerance to frustration, autism, hyperactivity or inability to focus, manipulative behaviors, psychopathologies… all leading to a new phase of conformism and cowardice. The Greeks already knew of this.

Destroying norms and limits was but a phase of the process. The next phase consists in re-making the norms, which relieves the mind from contrived internal conflicts, but differently. Now, people are allowed and strongly encouraged to discriminate on political grounds, to establish a hierarchy between different communities and their purported past sufferings, and to imitate what is in the media, academic or other systemic institutions. Why can girls discriminate absolutely whom they want to talk to whereas men should accept to give themselves to fat, entitled, disgraceful slobs? Because the demiurgic social engineers wanted it that way.

8. Maintaining invisibility

Just some rich dudes’ party. Move on

During all these steps, a true member of the elite should remember to maintain invisibility. Indeed, if someone feels like he is under attack, he will try to defend himself, and if the targeted individual manages to spot the attacker he may attract the attention of others on it, which would limit the attacker’s possible moves. Thus, everything should be made so that the attacker is either not perceived or not taken seriously.

The dumbest will believe that Leftism is “love” or that whatever comes next—that is, the next step of onslaught and degeneracy—will be cool. Gay marriage forced by the Supreme Court is awesome! Refugees are so enriching!

More commonsensical people will be tricked into believing that the threat comes from “terrorism”, or from the “far right”, or from Islam—as opposed to Western degeneracy and stripped of any racial implication—or whatever bogus cause that can be summoned. Fake opposition from a so-called radical Left that attacks “the bankers” without ever mentioning other actors of the crisis or who exactly bankers are before reinforcing the anti-right, anti-white, anti-Trump conditioning also make a good job at this.

Conclusion

Neuro-Linguistic Programming is a filtered-down version of the techniques used by the elite. As Lucien Cerise says, if cognitive sciences start from the assumption that the mind works like a computer, those who use them can consider that average people can be reprogrammed or “rewritten”, just as they can be disconnected or reconnected at will. This thinking suppresses people’s agency. Humans become mere matter between the hands of know-better social engineers—and we, just like the world we live in, are increasingly reshaped and remold by the mad will of power cultists.

Fortunately, once you know the tricks, spotting them is much easier.

Read Next:  The Dysfunction Of Modern Society Is Proof That Cultural Marxism “Works”

226 thoughts on “8 Ways You Have Been Psychologically Severed Through Harmful Conditioning”

  1. “The distinction between familiar and foreigner is but a keystone of human relationships. People have thicker, more trustworthy relationships between family members. Likewise, a close friend whom you knew for years is more likely to tell you the truth or repay what he owes you, and it should be normal that foreigners are to be put to the test and rejected if they choose to harm us.
    Well, these normal categories have been destroyed through
    “antiracism”, “tolerance”, “help refugees” and so on. Some say the endgame of this all is the destruction of all otherness. Everyone shall melt into the Brave New World!”
    That is the goal. Notice how right after Charlottesville, the media was imploring us to love everyone else? There was a case where a father publicly disowned his son for attending the rally, saying his son was no longer welcome in his home and that he had taught his son to “love everyone the same.”
    Love by definition is an exclusionary thing: it means you care more about someone than you do about others. If you love everyone the same, then you really don’t love anyone. That was the whole premise of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World: everyone belonged to everyone else.

    1. I guarantee you the media LOVED that cuck father disowning his son on TV for attending the rally. It showed he put ideological conformity over blood.

      1. Notice how the media would attack a father for disowning his daughter for mudsharking or his son for being gay praises a father who disowns his son for being a nationalist (Wrongthink)?

        1. Yep I noticed that, that kid got disowned by his parents for showing up at a nationalist march, but the same media will ruin the father of a daughter who mudsharks or admonishes a homosexual son.

  2. 1 killed by accident in Charlottesville: kill all white nationalists
    13 smushed to death in Barcelona: come together and pray

      1. I’m curious as to what you believe the similarities are between American James Fields and the ISIS terrorists in Barcelona.

    1. What does ISIS terroristism in Barcelona have to do with James Fields killing a woman in Charlottesville?

      1. He’s talking about the reactions. Fields panicked because his car was getting attacked, hit the gas and killed someone. Probably warrants a manslaughter charge for being a dipshit. Public reaction? HANG HIM!!!! EXPUNGE RIGHTS!!!! SUSPEND LAW!!!
        Reaction to Religion of Peacers running down 13 people+ in a deliberate, premeditated attack? Pray. Notallmuslims. Peace and stuff.

        1. I think Barcelona handled the terrorists well.
          James Fields will have his day in court; he may or may not have startled.

      2. Get lost you moronic whore.
        Questioning obvious things and passive aggressively dismissing a point are trite and pathetic troll tactics.
        Trolling whore.

        1. I see you’ve got yourself a new sock account, Mr. Fidel Stanton; welcome back.
          “All cruelty springs from weakness.”
          ― Seneca, Seneca’s Morals: Of a Happy Life, Benefits, Anger and Clemency

        2. Ha. Nurse, I think he thought you were a girl. You’re a guy though, aren’t you? I thought you were.

    2. Sarah Silverman ranted about killing Jesus and saying she was proud her people did it. Not a single Evangelical said a word.

      1. Pussies can say whatever they want, whenever they want, where ever they want and whomever they want; no questions asked, no accountability, no consequences to face and no punishment !!!

      2. Christian extremists are cowards unless they have the government to force their agenda onto non believers.
        How many has the christian taliban killed ?

        1. Hmmmm, probably only the militant pro-life fringe have actually killed anyone directly. Most of the rest are actually pretty tame.

      3. Well, do you think there were any in here audience, or are you saying any of us follow her career? I saw her in a Seth MacFarlane movie once. Too crass. She can go now.

        1. I only mentioned her as an example as to how some people get away with saying inappropriate things but others say something similar and are literally castrated for the same line of thought, they just happen to be a member of another group.
          She is indeed crass and obscene, its even more obscene she makes a living, a very good one spreading that garbage.

    3. Wrong and right don’t exist, comrade – whatever advances the revolution is good, whatever does not is evil. That is the moral calculus of the cultural Marxists.

  3. LGBTQ = full support of the government
    Mormon man with couple of wives and a bunch of kids = send his ass to prison

  4. We see in the media’s questioning of Trump’s state of mind the push to have dissenting or opposing ideology categorized as mental illness.
    The same people who will wail about how gays had to undergo electroshock therapy 50 years ago are the ones saying Trump and his supporters are mentally ill, mentally unfit for command etc.

    1. I’m seeing this more and more, seems like one strategy to remove him from office.
      Just like in the Soviet Union, dissent is mental illness.

  5. “Lacking the lessons from
    authority, boys are thrown into the world without knowing how to pick
    up, make themselves respected or handle threats whereas girls carry
    their narcissism around.”
    I think girls (not women but girls) today have more self-confidence than adult men do. I’ve seen 12 year old girls who act more arrogantly, dismissively, and condescendingly than 30 or 45 year old men.

    1. was about to quote that exact bit of text myself. Have observed both girls turning out narcissists and boys in the end not knowing how to pick up. And then we know about the effort required to correct the pick-up thing..

    2. That’s right.
      The reason – Marxist feminism.
      Feminism has brainwashed and indoctrinated both males and females. Masculinity has been demonized. Men and boys have been told for decades they are inferior human beings, whose only reason for living is to cater to girls and women. If they dare step out of line they are shamed into “maning up” – sort of serve, protect, provide and die for us, all the while we can treat you like shit. Men and boys are now regarded as criminals because of their gender, and have been taught from birth to be ashamed to be male.
      Any and all accountability and consequences has been removed from girls and women for even the most terrible actions and behaviors. This kowtowing to females has now been legally enshrined through legislation thanks to Marxist Feminism and left wing globalist politicians such as Obama and Hillary Clinton. A woman can now legally destroy a man on a whim and he has little or no recourse.
      Globalist elites realized long ago the number one way to destabilize and divide society is to mess with sex and gender – emasculate men through guilt, shame and removal of human rights. infantilize women by removing consequences for any reprehensible action, brainwash them into believing they’re “oppressed” and all men owe them forever – thus bringing about the huge sense of arrogance and entitlement so many women now have.
      Isn’t it interesting how sexual behaviors in men are now vilified, but those same behaviors, or far worse ones are not only perfectly acceptable in women, but are also encouraged.
      Now let’s throw the huge promotion of homosexuality and transgenderism into the mix as perfectly normal and acceptable. Now not only are men and women messed up, but let’s turn the boys into girls and the girls into boys to really screw the laws of nature up good.
      Weak, emasculated men – arrogant, childish women, and very, very messed up kids.
      Society is a mess, and as any good left wing globalist knows, indoctrinated, messed up people are easy to control and manipulate

      1. A few years ago a 15 year old boy was killed when he threw himself in front of a bullet to protect some female classmates. A noble sentiment, but misguided in my view.
        Of course he was hailed as a hero and “any real man (TM) would do what he did”. You, tax paying beta male, are expected to sacrifice your very life for a woman who will shout from the mountain top that she owes you nothing, not even common courtesy. And if you dare look at her in a way that makes her feel uncomfortable, you’ll be in the human resources office faster than you can say HR.

        1. Men in this society are regarded as nothing more than disposable appliances for war, industry and particularly for women.
          Women in modern society have far more rights than men, they also have endless privileges – a privilege being an unearned right – example: the right to vote. A man’s right to vote to this very day depends on his willingness to fight and die for his country in time of war. (registration with the Selective Service – AKA the draft). There is no blood cost for women – they were simply handed the right to vote.
          I find it astonishing in our western civilization women can treat a man like an absolute piece of shit, and then turn around and expect that same man to sacrifice his life for them in a dangerous or life threatening situation.
          Men are increasingly mistreated and stripped of human rights. Things will get so bad men will have no choice but to fight back – even though they are hardwired to work themselves to death or sacrifice their lives for women.
          It will take time, but movements such as MGTOW and the MHRM will surely grow by leaps and bounds in the coming years.

        2. While obviously the gap is widening, and becoming evermore extreme, this all stems from biology. 1 Man and 100 women can create an entire society. 100 Men and 1 Woman is an absolute dead end.

        3. Absolutely.
          It’s called gynocentrism – putting women first for exactly the reason you stated.
          Women get pregnant. For thousands of years maintaining a pregnancy, giving birth, and raising a child to adulthood was enormously risky. The mother, child, or both quite often died somewhere in the process. Women had to be protected and provided for – by men. One man could literally impregnate hundreds of women so men were not at all highly valued in the reproductive equation,
          Millions of years of hormones, biology, and evolution have hardwired men to sacrifice everything, even their lives for women. Women are innately hardwired for self preservation at the expense of men. The survival of the human race depended on it.
          That primitive, hardwired, reptilian part of the human brain, in both males and females is still at work today.
          Feminism ruthlessly exploits the innate instincts of both men and women. It is quite simply gynocentrism on steroids.
          Don’t think for one moment the CIA didn’t have a very clear understanding of male and female instinctive behavior when it engineered feminism as a force to destabilize society.

        4. At my job we had to sit through active shooter training. Basically telling us what to do in the event someone with a gun shows up and goes on a rampage.
          I thought to myself that if such a situation were to happen, all the women would run and hide behind the nearest able bodied man and expect him to magically conjure up some solution. And it wouldn’t matter if it was a “Chad” or not.
          These women would expect a man, who they’d never give their phone number to, to go and fight the guy with the gun so they can have a chance to escape.

        5. You said: “A man’s right to vote to this very day depends on his willingness to fight and die for his country in time of war. (registration with the Selective Service – AKA the draft). There is no blood cost for women – they were simply handed the right to vote.” Excellent Point. Thus, their vote should either count less, or frankly, possibly not even exist.
          I’d argue that – without getting all conspiracy theorist and shit – most wars since NAM have been self-manufactured by the ass clowns in charge. Our boys are off fighting wars, but for who and what really, a government’s poor decisions that we “voted” into existence which doesn’t even serve its people anyways? A REAL war, I.e., an invasion of USA homeland would really put this to the test. Granted, radical Islam is a cellular war, founded on theocracy and irrational beliefs.
          Yet, here we are, STILL thinking we can fight a cellular enemy with a conventional blanket army. The only way we should be fighting those battles is with small, ultra-effective special ops teams. We should have hundreds of special ops teams crushing them by now. Nope, gotta keep the military industrial complex bloated and misdirected around the world, like a police force that ‘protects and serves’ but serves itself by handing out millions in speeding tickets and senseless infractions on the very people it supposedly exists for, and is paid for by, to protect.

        6. I’ve noticed when talking to pregnant expecting women, the enlightenment of expecting a boy has worn off. It was always a special thing, especially in a family’s lineage where all the kids aren’t typically brothers, to hear ‘its a boy!” Now, there’s equal, if not more emphasis on the excitement of having a girl.

        7. Women would do more than that. They would expect men they would never give the time of day to literally take a bullet and sacrifice their own lives just so they (women) could survive.
          It’s called female privilege. Male privilege doesn’t exist.

        8. Good thing. Raise her right and she’ll fetch a good bride-price.
          No, I’m not kidding.

      2. How have you been able to keep the messy-parts of society from impacting you and your family?

        1. I myself try to exercise common sense when I watch the news. I listen VERY carefully, take everything with a grain of salt, and usually catch the subtle ways news stories are always slanted to the left – a good example, of course, is the President’s condemnation of the Charlottesville event saying “there was fault on all sides.” CNN immediately attacked him for siding with “white supremacists” while ignoring the fact antifa came to the event with weapons and was every bit as guilty as the white nationalists with regard to the ensuing violence.
          My kids are very young so I am careful to screen what they watch online and on television. We have a big screen TV on the wall in the family room, which is directly across from the kitchen, and can be seen from anywhere on the main floor. Both TV and internet are delivered through this set. It’s a great way to catch the garbage that unsupervised kids can get access to. When the kids ask why they can’t watch I explain why.
          I am very prudent with what my children are exposed to. When they start school, myself and other parents will definitely be periodically sitting in on classes to see exactly what the kids are being taught.
          I believe in the ‘old fashioned” traditional Dad goes out to work and Mom stays looks after the
          family way of doing things – still by far the best way to raise happy, well adjusted children. One of the most important aspects being Mom and Dad must be on the same page with EVERYTHING when it comes to raising kids.
          It’s not that hard with very young children, the real tough part of keeping the “messy parts” from doing their damage is yet to come – I just hope I have the talent and ability to keep my kids on the straight and narrow when they get a little older!

        2. It has been my experience that the principles learned in the home are the principles my daughter has expressed throughout her childhood, and into early adulthood.
          I think kids know on a deep-soul level when they are loved, respected, valued…I bet your kids will reflect your talent and ability, and every once in a while they’ll magnify your best qualities…and you and your husband will just be looking at each other, like…wow!
          Thank you for sharing your ideas with me this evening.

      3. Yep. A man tells a girl he loves her (when he doesn’t) in order to get sex, thats an evil worse than bashing a bed ridden 90 year old in the head with a bat.
        A woman lies to a man about a kid being his so she can collect money, no big deal.
        An 8 year old boy decides he wants to be a girl, he’s mature and worldly enough to make that decision all on his own.
        An 18 year old girl dates a man 10 or 20 years older, he’s taking advantage of her because shes not mature enough to make that decision. Besides, what will they talk about? Real women (TM) his age must intimidate him. Note that theres no penalty for a man dating older women (from 1 day older to 100 years older)

        1. I don’t get this. I’ve dated women significantly older than me-no one batted an eye. Date a girl 4-5 years younger than me and I’m “creepy”

        2. When I was 22, I briefly messed with a 40 year old woman. Now that Im 30, if I mess with a 22 year old, something must be wrong with me. That woman would be 48 now and I dont think anyone would be opposed to me dating a 48 year old, but a 22 year old and Im a creep.

    3. Absolutely- and arrogance is the perfect description for the attitude, as it not borne of any accomplishment other than carrying two X chromosomes.

      1. In youth, teenage years it is nowadays. They’re exploiting the authoritarian, pleaser, and ego stages of mental development. It’s a truly false sense of confidence, however, since “most” adults never exceed these non-principled stages of mental development, it’s considered by their peers, and many adults as actual confidence.
        It’s the same reason the guys on the football team in high school wind up doing well in suburbanite life. However, get them in a heated debate in the boardroom, or better yet, a serious fist fight as an adult, they get annihilated by smarter more skilled men that slipped through the political cracks the majority of our youth are indoctrinated to by imitating their parents and the whole of society. We’re living in a society that is now founded on complete immoral bullshit and image, nothing more, nothing less.
        Why does a badass, read; tough accomplished neo-man, wear a beard and cover himself in tatts and shoot testosterone injections twice a month before workouts? It’s because deep, deep, down, he’s a following-ass pussy, not a true leader. In a non-principled society, i.e. one where virtually 90% of its people operate out of slightly more than amoral phases of mental development (just beyond that of a baby, more akin to that of a 3-9 yo child), the entire society supports, is founded on, and operates to help the others like them exist.

  6. Just like how Stalin blamed things on Fascists and Trotskyites who had long been purged, so does the current system whip into a frenzy the collective masses against long dead foes like the Nazis, the KKK, and white supremacists.

  7. American millenials are totally hosed up. Seriously. I’ve managed them at work for years, and the between the SJW-ism, beta white knighting uber alles among the young guys, tatted up attention-whoring women whose only marriage will be to their IPhone (when will cell phone/female marital contracts be legalized, literally, by the way?), they are on the whole totally lost.

    1. I just started to realize just how many young women have tattoos nowadays. And not just a small flower or lower back tramp stamp but tattoos all over, up and down their legs and arms. Like something in a Russian prison. It’s insane.

      1. You aren’t kidding, for sure. And between that and the nose rings, blue hair and all the other crap, they think it has conferred snowflake-dom on themselves.

        1. LOL I don’t get the ire at nose rings, I’ve banged plenty of hot girls that had a little stud or little hoop and I think it’s kinda cute, but whatever floats your boat

        2. The piercings piss me off to no end, they think a chunk of metal is going to make them beautiful?
          Puncturing the skin with an unsightly hole just to put some metal shit in their face?
          Fuck outta here.

      2. Tragic…these young ladies and kids get these giant tattoos that will permanently disfigure them..Tragic…

      3. Youve got a much better chance finding a 4-leaf clover than a millennial girl who doesnt have her tits tattooed.

      4. Visited France and Germany last year. You think American girls are tattooed? You should loke at the “ladies” over there. Pure feminist trash.

        1. Its spreading all around the globe. Whites being the most susceptible. Even in Latin America the most tattooed girls you’d see in countries with large white populations – like Argentins, Chile or Uruguay.

        2. I haven’t gone that far south, but many white girls in Mexico’s three largest cities do fit the fat, purple hair tattooed feminist hoe mold to a T.

        3. Most Mexican girls are pudgy and 4s at best. I was thinking their obesity problem comes from overconsumption of soda and cheap tortillas. People rarely drink water in Mexico since tap water is crap and if you’d pay for a drink, they rather pay for Coke.

        4. Where is the gorgeous pure clean fit skin and looks of the ancient Greeks and Romans, and the 70 80s northern European countries women….gone all polluted and degenerate marked on slut is all that’s left anymore.

        5. A young girl ( or even a mature woman who’s not incinerated herself) with beautiful skin is a thing to behold. I’m shocked and a little saddened when I see an attractive young woman who has mutilated herself with tattoos. I’m almost (ALMOST) more forgiving of the girl who’d admit she was dumb or mentally incapacitated when she was scarred than the genius who professes that her disfigurement is of deep significance, that it tells a story.
          I know professionally some plastic surgeons who tell me they are very busy trying to erase the regrets of these morons, though most removals will still leave telltale ugly scars. Good.
          I’m afraid it will get worse before it’s better. My oldest is in private Catholic school, and a tattoo has become a spring break right-of-passage for many girls. I’m not sure why high school girls are on unchaperoned breaks,..

        6. The gorgeous broads one sees on Spanish language TV are definitely NOT Mexican, but of European heritage. The dumpy trolls in the audience of any Hispanic variety show are the real Mexicans.

        7. When I have kids I’ll I still into them the belief that if you want to be a rebel, or stand out in this day and age then you gotta:
          Not do drugs
          No tats/piercings
          Don’t smoke
          Drink in moderation
          Take care of your body

        8. I used to watch Mexican soap operas as a kid and most of the actors were beautiful and lean, some were even blond.
          Then I travelled there and the people I saw were far from even normal looking – short, fat with flabby bellies.

      5. Russian preasoners’ tattooes have meanings at least, like the kind of crimes committed, timed one been to jail, new found faith and so on.

      6. Not just young women. Much older women also have tattoos.
        Tattoos on females are huge red flags signalling four things:
        1) she’s a slut
        2) she’s mean
        3) she’s bitter
        4) she’s a feminist

    2. About 15 years ago, I asked a college-age relative what he thought of tattoos on girls. “Doesn’t bother me- I’ve dated (i.e. banged) girls with tats” he replied. He’s married now- to a very traditional girl with no tattoos.
      Part of my revulsion towards tatted-up girls has to do with my upbringing/age, part aesthetic ( I have NEVER seen a tattoo that improved a girl’s attractiveness) but is mostly value judgement. If I were a young unmarried guy, I wouldn’t want to screw, let alone marry a girl who would let a scabby tattoo “artist” ink her anywhere on her body, least of all on her pudendum, buttocks or breasts.

      1. Don’t be sad, be proud; what are you doing right in your life?
        My 23-year old daughter is a critical care nurse, she saves lives in the SICU; when she’s not working, she’s biking or jogging on the beach with her boyfriend-training for half-marathons, (he’s a whole-marathon guy, though)…there’s a lot of nice, responsible young men and women in their 20’s.

        1. You’re right- it’s easy to dwell on the losers. I was reminded of this by a guy I know who works in the building trades. He’s millenial-aged, but hard-working and has his shit together. He’s “embarrassed by” his generation and what’s happened in this country, and thought about heading to New Zealand. Of course I pointed out the ROK article that mentioned the Kiwi Kock Karousel, and all of a sudden, NZ didn’t seem as wonderful.

        2. Don’t let other people’s debauchery encroach on your adventure, (unless, of course, debauchery IS the adventure…).
          You are almost guaranteed to meet the fit and fun gals, if you plan an early morning fitness activity, like a hike; you never see a hung-over group of night-club ladies, eye-make-up smeared all over their face, blood-shot, puffy eyes, wearing last-night’s satin mini-skirt and scuffed-up heels on an early am hike, run, parachuting…

    3. The rubber band will stretch so far, before it snaps back. I’ve been lead to believe that our cause has found a resurgence amongst the newest millennials, who see their idiot forebears, and reject them outright.

  8. The retarded millennial generation adores Barack Obama even though he has been nothing more than aloof elite that lives high above all of them. They forget he kept the US in a state of war longer than any President before him, more than Abraham Lincoln, more than Woodrow Wilson, and more than FDR, and also JFK and LBJ and Nixon.

  9. An interesting article. Monsieur Cerise seems like he might have something to say, but he seems to have expressed himself exclusively in French so far.
    It’s important to focus on invisibility. It is the invisible world that we need to see more clearly. Change happens when it is indirect, thereby bypassing resistance. NLP gurus like Richard Bandler made this clear in their promotion of hypnotic techniques such as pioneered by Milton Erickson. Are we being programmed like a computer. Sure of course we are, but the metaphor of the mind as a computer that could be programmed in an analogous way is arguably not the beginning of such attempts. The word, the logos, the shem, all functions in much the same, only the programmer is God not man. But when man thinks he’s god, that subtle distinction isn’t so great any more. Invisibility is not merely a device, it has a deeper purpose and function then. Whether this is sinister or not may depend on a great many things. Nothing can be revealed unless it is first hidden. It’s just our elites are more keen on the hidden-ness part than the revelation……Or are they. Many of them are show men after all. When the Wizard of Oz was tracked down to his lair, and the curtain pulled back, was there not a part of him that was not secretly pleased?

  10. “The brain or subconscious works by distinguishing, categorizing, and classifying objects. We also need to imitate other people to learn: even an adult, if he enters into a new field, must observe what the established experts do to learn how things are done there.
    Well, what about preventing all this? Let’s say distinction is “discrimination”; categorization is “racist” and “oppressive”; classifying, as it implies hierarchizing, is “judgmental”; imitation is “reactionary”, “not creative” and stupid.”
    Some good points there. There have been systematic and organised attempts for about a century to prevent anything like real theory-building such that might pose any kind of challenge to the left marxist variety. All those social scientists announcing the end of grand theory does seem to have been designed to prevent genuine alternative theory building.

    1. They don’t want you to learn from experience: been robbed by black teenagers a couple of times? Crossing the street when you see a group of black teens is racist. Muslims keeping running people over? Not allowing more Muslims into your country is racist. It’s like getting a shock but you keep pushing the lever over and over again.

      1. that’s true, but that doesn’t mean it”s ‘about’ blacks, or muslims or any ‘protected group’. The only real protected group is the elites who’ve set up a system they do not want challenged

  11. When our society gaslights youngsters with the message that anyone can become anything, so that men can become women, immigrants with 2-digit IQ’s can become nuclear rocket surgeons and women with the upper body strength of 12 year boys can become Navy SEALS and kick terrorists’ asses like in the movies, then it shouldn’t surprise anyone that Millennials feel so disconnected from reality.

    1. It’s not only the cognitive dissonance created by the “it’s oppressive to work hard & earn something” mindset. It’s also the publicly accepted narrative that only white men can be racist, oppressive, are the reason for EVERY problem in the world that is preached in every song, movie, tv show, all over social media, & taught in schools. It’s pure destruction of culture & society. That’s why the push to get us to give up our rights to privacy (terrorism), & now the push to get us to give up our right to free speech (hate speech).
      There’s no need to take by force what you can dupe people into giving away for free.

      1. Yeah, but they have to assume white superiority when they condemn it. Again, absolutely no one worries about some nonwhite transgender person from a Third World country becoming Literally Hitler and terrorizing the world; we all assume that only exceptional white men have the goods to pull that off.

        1. Data104e

          Google is paying 97$ per hour! work for few hours and have longer with friends & family!
          On tuesday I got a Smart new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          !ao124d:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobs414CashMarketData/GetPay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ao124l..,…

        2. Google is paying 97$ per hour! work for few hours and have longer with friends & family!
          On tuesday I got a Smart new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          :!ap166:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobs456CashHomeShare/GetPay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ap166l..,…..

      2. When people lived in tribes, they worked like four hours a day. You might argue, “they didn’t have cell phones.” We don’t even want cell phones. We already can’t go back. The elite already have their claws in they minds of the walking dead. Their minds and ours.

    2. Talmudic brainwashing, that is what it is, going against the laws of nature as well as reason and logic.

      1. With the influx of Jew shills, they’ll call you a conspiracy theorist. My answer? Read the Talmud then, if thou not believeth me.

      2. I’ve told people that if they don’t believe in science, the try not believing in math. That’s really – no pun – the lowest common denominator here. And since math is the backbone of virtually all scientifically proven hypothesis, we can argue the next “literally Hitler” argument will be “Math proves nothing.”

        1. Look up the names of the people who run Hollywood and the mainstream media. Notice all the trash and film, TV, and “Journalism”?

    3. I sat my kids down and told them how everyone is going to tell them that boys kissing boys and girls kissing girls is acceptable when it’s not, and that everyone will tell them that God is not real, though he is. My son told me the world was round. I asked him how he knew. It was because they say it is, and show ‘pictures.’ We talked about ‘images’ vs ‘pictures.’ They’ll turn your kids against you. Their bread and butter is your kids turning their back on you to go get sodomized and to never think critically. I challenge you all to research for yourself.

      1. It is a really tough job to keep your kids from the culture smog. You have to give up certain things for yourself like television or radio or popular music, so that you may hope to have some success and keeping these things away from your children.

        1. All-republican radio. All the time. No TV. Modern movies very sparingly only after review. Nothing with ‘action girls.’

        1. Believe me. Wish I could afford to. $200/mo is the local private, and I can’t even free up that much.

        2. My son’s mother was paying $30,000 CAD A year for a private middle school. Fuck that.

    4. “our society gaslights youngsters with the message that anyone can become anything”
      Zootopia had lots of that. It made me sick.

  12. This scene shows the connection between atomizing the individual from his tribe, destroying his past, breaking his will and making him submit to tyranny.
    Seriously, our elites have gone full Oceania on us now; they don’t even try to rationalize it with “liberal” principles from the Enlightenment.

    1. 16 years and counting in Afghanistan: “the war is not meant to be won it is meant to be continuous”

      1. I suspect something like Mackinder’s Heartland Theory plays a role in our elites’ obsession with keeping a military stronghold in Afghanistan.
        He who controls the Heartland, controls the World!

      2. In Nineteen Eighty-Four Orwell through Goldstein’s book says explicitly that perpetual war absorbs the surplus wealth of industrial production. The Party uses the wealth for warfare because it wants to keep ordinary people’s standard of living from rising; otherwise their growing affluence would would make them demand more of a say in running things.

        1. That doesn’t correspond with any conflicts. That corresponds with women entering the work force en masse.

  13. André Du Pôleaugust asks, “How did the West turn like this?”
    An unholy alliance of political homosexuals, feminists, coloreds and communists have banded together to do one thing, destroy their Moby Dick, the great white male.
    See my work: AHAB MOBY DICK RACISM. WHAT THE SOCIAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT IS ALL ABOUT — HUNTING THE GREAT WHITE MALE.
    All three see the white male as the impediment to their respective desires. Homos desire to rid all of white male driven Protestant Christian morality, which formed the basis of jurisprudence in British Colonial American and the founding of the USA. Clearly, one can’t be a raging homo if one is being censured by morality.
    Feminists desire to rid all of white males and white male led married life. Feminists, as females, lack intellects to earn power. Likewise, feminists lack strength to fight for power. So feminists need another strategy to take it.
    Clearly, one can’t have abortions or pump out babies without someone paying for those things. Feminists would like someone to pay, but they desire not to be on the hook to those who pay — males. Feminists see white males as the impediment to having abortion. Never mind that white males on the USSC rendered the Roe v. Wade ruling.
    Coloreds suffer from the same problem as feminists — lower IQs on average. Coloreds can’t earn their way to the top of power, so they must rely upon other means to rid themselves of white males.
    Communists would like to be in power. They know that a totalitarian system like communism, if they could usher such into play, would let them murder their way to keeping power. Commies use queers, feminists, and coloreds as their useful idiots.
    What stands between commies and their goal? White males, the ones who have devised capitalism, capitalism that flowed from Protestant Christian individualism and its attendant British enlightenment.

  14. ‘How does one man assert his power over another, Winston?’
    Winston thought. ‘By making him suffer,’ he said.
    ‘Exactly. By making him suffer. Obedience is not enough. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing. Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but MORE merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress towards more pain. The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy — everything. Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — for ever.’

    1. “There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy “.
      Sounds just like the modern day left, no sense of humor whatsoever and the only thing they are allowed to laugh about is a perceived victory over or a sleight directed at the right.

      1. “There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science” , sounds just like the religion of peace, no wonder the lefties and the R.O.P are such good bedfellows..

        1. No art, no literature, no science, no laughter, yes that does sound just like religion.
          The religious reich wants to homeschool us back into the dark ages.

        1. “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a designer woman’s pump stamping on a human face — for ever.’

    2. Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined.

      Makes you wonder if our elites promote hedonistic degeneracy in the short run as a strategy to destroy our character, then they’ll stomp on it in the long run to get us something closer to Oceania’s pain-oriented system.

        1. I have been successful in creating a better world for myself.
          I did it through hard work, learning a skilled trade, and turning my back on religion.

        2. And again.
          This whore is passive aggressively trolling.
          When she’s not being a whore she’s being a troll.

        3. If you rack-up a bunch of comments on your new sock account, many people won’t realize your account is only a few days old. Happy trolling, Mr. Socks!
          “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an ass of yourself.”
          ― Oscar Wilde

    3. I don’t understand how Orwell hit so many nails on the head. His only mistake was the title of his book: it should have been 2024 instead of 1984. But the left is there already.

    4. How could Orwell possibly have seen into the future so accurately? The only mistake he made was naming his title 1984 instead of 2024. But the left is almost there now. Trump is going to be forced to take dramatic action sometime in the near future.

  15. The gaps in history that are being omitted….. slavery has always been with us. Whites owe the dindus nothing….. take down Jefferson’s state!!!!!

    1. What I find fascinating is when I have confronted SJWs with the evidence of actual modern slavery, I get ignored and even accused of being hateful. Apparently offering them the evidence at globalslaveryindex.com is just too much cognitive dissonance for them. I point out that there is a real slavery and rape issue alive and well today that they should do something about and it seriously triggers them. It’s apparently much easier to dwell on the plight and crimes of those long dead than it is to fight a real problem in the here and now.

      1. Exactly….. facts do not compute with those fools. Whites being murdered in South Africa by the thousands, Arabs enslaving more Africans than whites ever did, Africans themselves enslaving opposing tribes and selling them into slavery, etc., etc., the list goes on. They hate their own skin. There is no redemption for those that want to see their own tribe decimated.

        1. “They hate their own skin.” Perhaps this explains the popular trend of massive tattoos and piercings. They apparently hate their skin so much they mark it up with permanent ink and punch holes in it. They need to take a look at some of the bikers and their “babes” from back in the day that are now in their fifties and sixties. If they hate their own skin now, give them about thirty years and they are really gonna hate it.

      2. This has begun to happen because in HS and university they equate stress-causing discussions with real violence. You can see it for yourself if you can stomach it, just read a few articles on slate or huffpo. You’ll see lots of references to violence when what they are talking about is controversial statements. Once after a mass shooting I had a discussion with someone who wanted to ban magazines that held more than 5 or 10 rounds. I told them that if someone wanted to they could kill lots of people with nothing but a bolt action rifle or even a single shot rifle, and that in fact this happened in wars up until the 20th century. They told me the conversation was too stressful and that I came across like I was planning some kind of attack. This came completely out of left field to me. It was someone I’d known for a long time and I wasn’t the slightest bit worked up or passionate about the argument. It really proved to me how sheltered your average leftist has become.

        1. It’s amazing isn’t it? And I don’t know if it’s sheltered as much as thoroughly indoctrinated into a particular dogma. When you start getting through to them it seems to cause mental anguish. Face to face, when confronted with facts and logic, it’s not unusual for them to try to shout me down and chant “That’s your opinion! That’s your opinion!” OMG, thinking hurts! LOL!

  16. Nicely written and relevant content.
    “Common sense, common understanding, a shared sense of norms and belonging have been well eroded. Civilization has exploded. Only its infrastructure remains.”
    I reflected a while but largely agree. Maybe things are often not as bad but it is tue that it is mostly consumerist patterns and infrastructure that get people pseudo-connected to each other in public.
    However, there are positive things about hyper-modernity, or at least things that are hard to erase: family, true friendships, and lifestyle convergence/neo-tribalism, like fitness, the manosphere, and (s)expats.

  17. I’ve gathered that a lot of Millennial SJW’s and antifas read Harry Potter novels. Mike Enoch says he has trolled them during his public confrontations with them by asking them which Harry Potter novel they like the best. Also Alt Right guys chant, “Harry Potter isn’t real!”
    I don’t advocate burning books, but when they become propaganda or spiritual fuel for ridiculous causes, I can understand the temptation to make an exception for Rowling’s works.

    1. I’ve never touched the Potter books or watched the films, since they seemed boring junk to me at first glance. Are they really that SJW friendly?

      1. I didn’t make this up:
        10 Important Lessons ‘Harry Potter’ Can Teach Us About Society
        https://www.bustle.com/articles/146699-10-important-lessons-harry-potter-can-teach-us-about-society

        We already know that there are many lessons to be learned from Harry Potter. And I’m not going to say that the series is the end-all be-all guide to social justice, but boy are there a lot of lessons in there that it can teach us about our own society (are you listening, U.S. presidential candidates?). There’s still a terrifying amount of ignorance and injustice in the world. We could all use a magical allegory now and then.

        Steve Sailer has also noticed the connection, though he points out the irony of white liberals who claim they care about the oppressed, yet they love a story full of tropes about life in the English upper classes, for example, the elite boarding school for people with hereditary gifts that ordinary mortals lack:
        Hogwash 101
        http://takimag.com/article/hogwash_101_steve_sailer/print#axzz4qUsDm4nm

        1. Thanks.
          This is interesting. I’ll read the articles to see what it’s all about.
          I know Rowling loves to preach SJW junk from behind her 24/7 high security, walled off castle or wherever it is she lives now, so it wouldn’t be surprising that the books are so malignant.

        2. JK Rowling has never stressed it, and I think she might claim to be a christian in her personal life (I can’t confirm but Norm McDonald says so) but there’s also the religion versus magic aspect of adhering to a Harry Potter world view. The Abrahamics have never really like Sorcery

      2. They’re decently entertaining children’s books- and I stress children’s. What’s hilarious is fans of the series regard them as ‘modern classics’ an oxymoron in and of itself, and believe them to be equal to Shakespeare.
        SJW’s do seem to treat the world of HP as a safe space, I’ve found.

    2. I’d say it was more GOT right now. Every modern SJW has her own personal (if imaginary) social justice dragon right behind her supporting her cause

  18. The most pampered generation ever lived. The more I learn about society around me, the less I care about it.

  19. Remember all the posts on ROK about SJWs and feminists creating safe spaces? They blocked “hate speech” and dissenting opinions?
    Kinda like how ROK banned:
    Ghost Of Jefferson
    Hipponax
    The Champion
    bem
    Unabashed
    lolknee
    Pabst
    Porcer
    Corkscrew Captain
    Tom Arrow
    “Why support other manosphere sites and help the movement grow, when you can be a petty little bitch and passive aggressively ban silently without giving a reason? Bunch of fags”-Ghost of Jefferson
    You silently banned the guys who have supported your site with conversations sometimes better than the articles.
    Rather that accept that we’re guys and we’re going to joke around, you quietly block us.
    We may not be as big as your site (yet) but we won’t abandon our core values for clicks or when a new site comes around. Like an insecure bitch you couldn’t handle the thought of another guy besting you. Rather that out do us, you rage quit.
    Incepto Ne Desistam
    http://www.akingscastle.com

        1. Its like they’re trying to shun all the guys that visited their site multiple times a day. Like they’re changing who they’re trying to cater to

        1. Whats suspicious about former posters going to another blog? What is suspicious is the purging of posters who did not violate policy and were banned without an explanation.
          In Feb. 2016 some of those commentators defended ROK and Roosh from the SJW bombardment of this site being a “pro-rape” group. Now they were tossed out.
          Suspicious nes pa?

        2. suspicious as in it seems kind of coordinated. I remember when Tom Arrow was banned and suddenly there were people advocating decamping to his website. People have agendas is all I’m saying and things aren’t always as they seem. Doesn’t mean I don’t miss those guys for their contributions, but if they really didn’t violate policy (and I have no idea if they did or didn’t for the most part) why would they be banned in a world where clicks means advertising money?

        3. Bollocks. Tom was a troubled man, but no one decamped or suggsted that. Your last question only the mods can answer and they remain silent. Dope it out.

        4. I’m not so sure. Tom had a good dozen or so regulars showing solidarity with him. Not a few of the same names who appear to be hanging out at this new site. Doesn’t bother me, I just can’t hack all this playing innocent and aggrieved.

        5. A couple of people actually venture between sites in the manosphere. Originally heard about this site back in 2014 from a friend who doesn’t frequent this site anymore but, some things I get. Cross marketing might be an easy thing to explain. Also feels the comment section has switched a bit since the rules to commenting has been displayed. Just hope the site doesn’t get too affected by the recent Neo Nazi revelations to shift what it was about; revealing the Red Pill to enhance the lives of men who visit this site.

        6. I thought things were fine, was happy here, and would have opposed any changes had I any say in the matter. If there is some conspiracy, I’m an unwitting (and unwilling) accomplice.

        7. No , but thats your perception.
          No one is playing aggrieved. Just asking why they are being excluded.

        8. We’ve been posting articles on AKC since February, long before any shenanigans started going on here.
          Not everything is some grand conspiracy. We saw a lot of guys that have been chatting for a long time on ROK suddenly get banned and we invited them to continue the banter on our site.

        9. He had a blog a few years ago that actually was a bit profound (and had some upbeat gems, too).

        10. I’ve read his blog before “Man without a father” or something to that effect. I enjoyed his company, but he was mighty mopey.

        11. Obviously there’s nothing wrong with frequenting similar sites including with the same denizens. Poaching custom is a nothing, but again it’s all part of healthy competition. Less healthy perhaps are the kind of comments you get here which involve attempts at a Spartacus type revolt and decampment.

        12. I’m sure conspiracy isn’t the right word. But when there’a public protest against the banhammer or whatever, accompanied by people listing all the others who’ve been similarly treated, and a message saying ‘we’re all hanging out x.com’ come join us, then that suggests a certain amount of organisation

        13. So they’re not playing aggrieved, they actually are so? Perhaps, but the solidarity with Tom was 9 months ago. Now the same thing crops up again. So were any sympathising commenters aggrieved the whole time?

        14. I think it’s howsyourfather.com or something. No, as Fokker said. He’s still going it seems

        15. All healthy competition I’m sure. Personally my interest would be in any ideological differences. I always felt that some of those guys wanted to move things in a slightly different direction. But heh, good luck with your site and all that. But not too much so 🙂

        16. There has been no coordination taking place in the open. As best I can tell, it’s just one guy who is taking the matter a shade too seriously, enjoys drama a shade too much, though probably does sincerely wish to re-create the atmosphere.
          As far as raising awareness that the banter that is now prohibited here lives on elsewhere, that seems fine, but the way he is going about it seems unnecessarily antagonistic. The way the whole thing has progressed is disappointing.

        17. that’s probably the case for the most part. But i think there were always underlying ideological differences, and that’s no small thing necessarily. I’m fine for ideological conflict to play out in the forums – that’s what they’re for after all, but it doesn’t hurt to always be aware of ‘what is being done’

    1. Not sure what is going on as of late. While I do appreciate the benefits this site has added to my own life over the years, and the quality articles and commentators as well, it is unfortunate that some of our best commentators have been banned. I know this is in lieu of the recent crackdowns on the internet, but these posters in particular, are the furthest from the ilk that ROK should be banning.

      1. I think it comes down to wanting to LOOK a certain way rather than BE that way. Every time someone questioned the content of an article it was “INSTABANNED” If you truly stand by what you say, you can take criticism without wining or just plugging your ears

        1. not necessarily. I’d say it had more to do with deviating from the topic in such a way that obscured the substance of the argument.

        2. Personally, I have no problem with criticism. If someone who has no clue about Korean culture beyond Wikipedia criticize my articles, I respond and prove that they are mistaken. If I make a typo or minor mistake I correct it (if possible).
          Ps. Hope GOJ and lolknee will return (= return of kings).

    2. “We may not be as big as your site (yet) but we won’t abandon our core values”
      But that’s the issue isn’t it. The core values. The raison d’etre. I miss those guys too somewhat, but some of them always seemed to have a bit of an agenda.

      1. ROKs articles have been pretty shit lately. A few good ones here and there, but honestly the constant bitching and blaming feminists/jews for EVERYTHING is getting a little thin as an argument.
        It got to the point where I would just skip the article to go to the comments because it was honestly better and more insightful.

        1. In the main – apart for the lore about lolknee – I have no idea – specifically – what these guys did to get banned (i.e. mouthed off, posted jailbait photos etc). Are you saying they were somehow objecting to “the constant bitching and blaming feminists/jews for EVERYTHING”?

        2. I agree man. It’s the reason why lolknee and ghost were two of my favorite commenters. They didn’t just complain or blame they actually built their private lives up to how they wanted it to be and shared how to do it with us. Complaining about a problem won’t make it go away. We need practical red pill solutions on how to navigate these troubling times.

        3. I was just commenting about ROK in general with the feminist/sjw bitching. Not the commenters. I find it funny that the site slams liberals and feminists for banning anyone who disagrees with them, imposing such a comment policy.
          If they were mouthing off, who fucking cares? Guys mouth off all the time plus most of them brought up good topics, as well as some fun here and there. I never saw them posting jailbait or anything like that.

        4. I agree, and the constant pushing of religion as a cure all is getting old to.
          I really miss the historical articles by Quintus.

    3. I wouldn’t consider pabst apart of that group you mention. He was a troll. He still is

      1. True, but honestly I did sort of miss his consistently pessimistic “white guys can’t get any” posts.
        For me they were a sort of daily dose of humorous pessimism. 🙂

    4. I thought they were on lengthy sabbaticals to exotic places…hopefully they will return to posting here, soon.

      1. I expect to be banned some day, I always end representing the less popular side of the discussion.
        The amount of Jew blaming and church worshiping seems to be getting more common as of late.

    5. I thought I hadn’t seen a few of those guys around… Banned for what, so RoK can be more ‘PC’?
      I really hope that isn’t the case.

    6. Whoa whoa whoa….
      GO-freaking J!?
      The hell with that crap! I check out the comments sections -just- for his input.
      Guess it’s a matter of time before (redacted in case he gets banned too) goes.

      1. Of course. It’s like that bit reveal with Verbal Kint at the end of the Usual Suspects isn’t it?

  20. The far-left are nihilists who hate the law of identity, and want you to destroy yourself by doing the same… They want you to do this:

  21. There was a book written in 1950 that seems to be one of the accurate depictions of our society. The Lonely Crowd by David Riesman. This little video briefly sums up the three types of people societies produce. We’re in the last stages.

  22. OK here is rival site https://www.akingscastle.com/ where some old ‘regulars’ have decamped.
    One article on July 24th then the next doesn’t appear until August 16th, with 13 and 7 comments respectively. Then Aug 17 article – 114 comments, August 21, 53 comments, August 22 – 224 comments, August 33, 349, and today August 24th on an article entitled “3 Potential Side Hustles For The Busy Dad” 555 comments, with GOJ’s comment as a sticky.
    How strange. What could be going on?

  23. I believe that we will go gentle into to that good night if fate willingly gives us the opportunity we will stand a chance if we rallies in large number fast enough but if we wait to long weather we want to or not we will be force to pick sides but by that point it will be too late to win. the beginning of this internal struggle has already commenced make you’re minds up and act quickly or move out of the way in either case america will not lead the world no longer for another has already take in its place they will be the new superpowers of this world china and its allies for they have not lead tray from the path of we lost in the 1960s but even they will be corrupted in time. that is all i have to say on this matter I wish everyone the best in these perambulate times and may logic triumph like it did in the dark ages.

  24. The globalist elite feat uprisings. Populism is their fear. Worse, they have no end game. They want to reshape the world, Money alone can only achieve so much. The real issue is the individual agency being usurped.

  25. You started out so well describing the issue but descended into convoluted rubbish when portioning out blame.
    Wouldn’t it have been a tad easier to just say that the world is changing and the old “rules” have been cast aside, rightly or wrongly ostracised and in the ensuing vacuum nothing concrete has emerged in the chaos of clashing ideas and guidelines?
    Do we really need a western caliphate or a return to 1950s America in order for everyone (yes all you unfortunate white folks) to be happy ? Is this modern world
    really so unmanageable that you can’t navigate it, be successful, and not feel threatened by just about fucking everything that’s different than you? Don’t you realise that your intolerance is the mirror image of what you believe is warped and uncivilised? or did i miss something?

    1. I might add that all the warped lefties and demonic liberals you despise with such vigor might be a symptom of the problem – not the cause – don’t forget they were born as a reaction to the golden age of conservatism – just like it takes two straight folks to create a gay one – …. yes Luke – i am your father.

Comments are closed.